Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bullitt v. Farrar, 43 N.W. 566.

42 citing documents.

Florenzano v. Olson 387 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1986
Florenzano v. Olson 387 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1986
Whereas the words “fraudulent intent” naturally connote purposeful dishonesty, we have held that even if a misrepresentation is made without purpose to deceive or without knowledge of its falseness, “[t]he fraud is as great as if the party knew his statement to be untrue.” Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8, 11 , 43 N.W.
Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey & Co. 130 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1964
Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey & Co. 130 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1964
The trial court in its memorandum expressed the view that “[w]hile it is true that an intent to deceive, in the sense of an evil motive, or deliberate design to cause loss, or consciousness of the falsity of the representation, is not required' in an action for deceit, Swanson v. Domning, 251 Minn. 110 , , Schlecter v. Felton, 134 Minn. 143 , , Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , the existence of what is called ‘fraudulent intent’, in a wider sense, is material.” We agree with the trial court.
Spiess v. Brandt 41 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1950
Spiess v. Brandt 41 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1950
Schlechter v. Felton, 134 Minn. 143 , , L. R. A. 1917A, 556; Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L. R. A. 149, 18 A. S. R. 485; Hedin v. Minneapolis M. & S. Inst.
Osborn v. Will 236 N.W. 197 Minn. 1931
Osborn v. Will 236 N.W. 197 Minn. 1931
Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L. R. A. 149, 18 A. S. R. 485; Miller v. Bricker, 117 Minn. 394 , ; Wann v. N. W. Trust Co. 120 Minn. 493 , ; Jacobson v. C. M. & St.
Saupe v. St. Paul Trust Co. 212 N.W. 892 Minn. 1927
Saupe v. St. Paul Trust Co. 212 N.W. 892 Minn. 1927
The rule is stated substantially as follows in Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L. R. A. 149, 18 Am.
Tischer v. Bardin 194 N.W. 3 Minn. 1923
Tischer v. Bardin 194 N.W. 3 Minn. 1923
Humphrey v. Merriam, 32 Minn. 197 , ; Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L. R. A. 149, 18 Am.
Ristvedt v. Watters 178 N.W. 166 Minn. 1920
Ristvedt v. Watters 178 N.W. 166 Minn. 1920
Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L.R.A.
Duholm v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 177 N.W. 772 Minn. 1920
Duholm v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 177 N.W. 772 Minn. 1920
Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L.R.A.
Perkins v. Orfield 176 N.W. 157 Minn. 1920
Perkins v. Orfield 176 N.W. 157 Minn. 1920
Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L.R.A.
Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 163 N.W. 665 Minn. 1917
Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 163 N.W. 665 Minn. 1917
Schlechter v. Felton, supra; Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L.R.A.
Shane v. Jacobson 162 N.W. 472 Minn. 1917
Shane v. Jacobson 162 N.W. 472 Minn. 1917
Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L.R.A.
Knopfler v. Flynn 160 N.W. 860 Minn. 1917
Knopfler v. Flynn 160 N.W. 860 Minn. 1917
Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L.R.A.
Schlechter v. Felton 158 N.W. 813 Minn. 1916
Schlechter v. Felton 158 N.W. 813 Minn. 1916
We think, however, that the court in Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8, 12 , , 6 L.R.A.
Johnson v. Olsen 158 N.W. 805 Minn. 1916
Johnson v. Olsen 158 N.W. 805 Minn. 1916
§ 3819; Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co. 129 Minn. 145 , ; Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L.R.A.
Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 156 N.W. 251 Minn. 1916
Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 156 N.W. 251 Minn. 1916
It was held in Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L.R.A.
Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co. 151 N.W. 914 Minn. 1915
Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co. 151 N.W. 914 Minn. 1915
Humphrey v. Merriam, 32 Minn. 197 , ; Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L.R.A.
Bunkers v. Peters 141 N.W. 1118 Minn. 1913
Bunkers v. Peters 141 N.W. 1118 Minn. 1913
Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L.R.A.
Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 130 N.W. 1110 Minn. 1911
Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 130 N.W. 1110 Minn. 1911
Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L.R.A.
Holt v. Sims 102 N.W. 386 Minn. 1905
Holt v. Sims 102 N.W. 386 Minn. 1905
Humphrey v. Merriam, 32 Minn. 197 , ; Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , ; McKibbin v. Ellingson, 58 Minn. 205 , .
Charles P. Kellogg Co. v. Holm 85 N.W. 159 Minn. 1901
Charles P. Kellogg Co. v. Holm 85 N.W. 159 Minn. 1901
Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , .
Knappen v. Freeman 50 N.W. 533 Minn. 1891
Knappen v. Freeman 50 N.W. 533 Minn. 1891
Haven v. Neal, 43 Minn. 315 , ( ;) Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , ( 43 N. W. Rep.