Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Erickson v. West, 43 N.W. 845.

42 citing documents.

City of St. Paul v. Whidby 203 N.W.2d 823 Minn. 1972
City of St. Paul v. Whidby 203 N.W.2d 823 Minn. 1972
Erickson v. West, 42 Minn. 147
Peterson v. Peterson 153 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1967
Peterson v. Peterson 153 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1967
Erickson v. West, 42 Minn. 147 , ; see, e. g., State v. Everett, 14 Minn. 330 (439).
State v. Hartman 112 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 1961
State v. Hartman 112 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 1961
Erickson v. West, 42 Minn. 147, 152 , , where, in regard to offenses involving the violation of municipal ordinances to which a penalty is attached, he said: “* * * ^ municipal ordinance is as much a law for the protection of the public as is a criminal statute of the state, the only difference being that the one is designed for t
State v. Ketterer 79 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1956
State v. Ketterer 79 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1956
Erickson v. West, 42 Minn. 147, 151 , (wherein the earlier decision of City of Mankato v. Arnold, 36 Minn. 62 , , was qualified and distinguished), offenses involving the violation of municipal ordinances to which a penalty, such as fine or imprisonment, is attached as a punishment are “criminal” offenses within the l
Reid v. Independent Union of All Workers 275 N.W. 300 Minn. 1937
State Ex Rel. Connolly v. Parks 273 N.W. 233 Minn. 1937
State Ex Rel. Connolly v. Parks 273 N.W. 233 Minn. 1937
Erickson v. West, 42 Minn. 147 , ; 39 Harv.
State Ex Rel. Plaster v. Maher 204 N.W. 955 Minn. 1925
State Ex Rel. Plaster v. Maher 204 N.W. 955 Minn. 1925
In State v. West, 42 Minn. 147, 149 , , where the sentence was held void altogether, there was not jurisdiction to try it.
State ex rel. Carmody v. Reed 156 N.W. 127 Minn. 1916
State ex rel. Carmody v. Reed 156 N.W. 127 Minn. 1916
State v. West, 42 Minn. 147 , ; State v. Kinmore, 54 Minn. 135 , , 40 Am.
City of St. Paul v. Robinson 152 N.W. 777 Minn. 1915
City of St. Paul v. Robinson 152 N.W. 777 Minn. 1915
State v. Everett, 14 Minn. 330 (439); City of Mankato v. Arnold, 36 Minn. 62 , ; State v. West, 42 Minn. 147 , .
State ex rel. Wilcox v. Ryder 147 N.W. 953 Minn. 1914
State ex rel. Wilcox v. Ryder 147 N.W. 953 Minn. 1914
To sustain this position, they cite Kennedy v. Raught, 6 Minn. 155 (235) ; State v. West, 42 Minn. 147 , ; Board of Co. Commrs.
State ex rel. Works v. Langum 146 N.W. 1102 Minn. 1914
State ex rel. Works v. Langum 146 N.W. 1102 Minn. 1914
State v. West, 42 Minn. 147 , .
State ex rel. Salter v. McDonald 141 N.W. 110 Minn. 1913
State ex rel. Salter v. McDonald 141 N.W. 110 Minn. 1913
The cases of State v. West, 42 Minn. 147 , , and State v. Bates, 105 Minn. 440 , , are of no importance in this connection.
City of Madison v. Martin 123 N.W. 809 Minn. 1909
City of Madison v. Martin 123 N.W. 809 Minn. 1909
See, in this connection, State v. West, 42 Minn. 147, 150 , .
State v. Collins 120 N.W. 1081 Minn. 1909
State v. Collins 120 N.W. 1081 Minn. 1909
City of Mankato v. Arnold, 36 Minn. 62 , ; State v. West, 42 Minn. 147 , ; State v. Harris, 50 Minn. 128 , .
State ex rel. Bahr v. Bates 117 N.W. 844 Minn. 1908
State ex rel. Bahr v. Bates 117 N.W. 844 Minn. 1908
In 1889 it was held in State v. West, 42 Minn. 147 , that a municipal court had no jurisdiction to try a case where the prescribed punishment may exceed three months’ imprisonment and one hundred dollars fine, the limits of the jurisdiction of justices of the peace.
State v. Marciniak 105 N.W. 965 Minn. 1906
State v. Marciniak 105 N.W. 965 Minn. 1906
See State v. West, 42 Minn. 147, 151 , .
State ex rel. Madigan v. Wagener 77 N.W. 424 Minn. 1898
State ex rel. Madigan v. Wagener 77 N.W. 424 Minn. 1898
They are not offenses under any general law of the state, or any municipal ordinance applicable to the public generally, and hence not criminal offenses, even as defined in State v. West, 42 Minn. 147 , .
State ex rel. Hull v. Wolfer 71 N.W. 681 Minn. 1897
State v. Robitshek 61 N.W. 1023 Minn. 1895
State v. Robitshek 61 N.W. 1023 Minn. 1895
Paul v. Smith, 27 Minn. 364 , ; State v. Lee, 29 Minn. 445 , ; City of Mankato,, v. Arnold, 36 Minn. 62 , ; State v. West, 42 Minn. 147 , ; State v. Sexton, 42 Minn. 154 , ; State v. Harris, 50 Minn. 128 , .
State ex rel. Rea v. Kinmore 55 N.W. 830 Minn. 1893
State ex rel. Rea v. Kinmore 55 N.W. 830 Minn. 1893
State v. West, 42 Minn. 147 , ( 43 N. W. Rep.
State v. Harris 52 N.W. 387 Minn. 1892
Distinguished State v. Harris 52 N.W. 387 Minn. 1892
In commenting upon the ground upon which *133 that decision rests, in State v. West, 42 Minn. 147 , ( 43 N. W. Rep.
State ex rel. Ahern v. Anderson 50 N.W. 226 Minn. 1891
State ex rel. Ahern v. Anderson 50 N.W. 226 Minn. 1891
State v. West, 42 Minn. 147 , ( 43 N. W. Rep.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by