Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ziebarth v. Nye, 44 N.W. 1027.

26 citing documents.

David Lindstrom, Trustee of the Gladys B Lindstrom Living Trust, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See, e.g., Bulletin, d at 685 (concluding that the landowner “failed to make its case” when its experts “did not indicate that cost to cure was less than the market value difference”); (co mmenting that, if the party “thought that the cost of restoring the land to its former condition would be less than the injury to the value of the land .
John Aydt v. Steven A. Hensel, City of St. Michael Minn. Ct. App. 2016
John Aydt v. Steven A. Hensel, City of St. Michael Minn. Ct. App. 2016
And the proper remedy for a single trespass is monetary “compensation for all damages to the property resulting from the trespass.” Ziebarth v. Nye, 42 Minn. 541, 544, 44 N.W.
In re Minnwest Bank Litigation Concerning Real Property in Otsego, Minnesota, Minnwest Bank v. RTB, LLC 873 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re Minnwest Bank Litigation Concerning Real Property in Otsego, Minnesota, Minnwest Bank v. RTB, LLC 873 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Hebert v. City of Fifty Lakes 744 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2008
Hebert v. City of Fifty Lakes 744 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2008
at 332, d at 315 (concluding that the act of making excavations in a street constituted a permanent trespass because “the wrong resulted] from the completed act”); Ziebarth v. Nye, 42 Minn. 541, 542, 544 , 44 N.W.
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin 122 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1963
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin 122 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1963
Citing Ziebarth v. Nye, 42 Minn. 541 , , plaintiff argues *397 that, assuming the absence of express or implied consent, defendant cannot maintain trespass because it was not in possession when the trespass was oomplete.
Groves v. John Wunder Co. 286 N.W. 235 Minn. 1939
Carpenter v. Gantzer 204 N.W. 550 Minn. 1925
Carpenter v. Gantzer 204 N.W. 550 Minn. 1925
Village of White Bear v. Stewart, 40 Minn. 284 , ; Ziebarth v. Nye, 42 Minn. 541 , .
Berg v. Village of Chisholm 173 N.W. 423 Minn. 1919
Berg v. Village of Chisholm 173 N.W. 423 Minn. 1919
§ 9649; Ziebarth v. Nye, 42 Minn. 541 , ; Morgan v. City of Albert Lea, 129 Minn. 59 , .
Heath v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 148 N.W. 311 Minn. 1914
Heath v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 148 N.W. 311 Minn. 1914
Paul, Stillwater & Taylor’s Falls R. Co. 22 Minn. 118 ; Ziebarth v. Nye, 42 Minn. 541 , ; Evans v. Northern Pac.
Worden v. Bielenberg 138 N.W. 314 Minn. 1912
Followed Worden v. Bielenberg 138 N.W. 314 Minn. 1912
See, also, Ziebarth v. Nye, 42 Minn. 541 , .
Sallden v. City of Little Falls 113 N.W. 884 Minn. 1907
Sallden v. City of Little Falls 113 N.W. 884 Minn. 1907
Ziebarth v. Nye, 42 Minn. 541 , .
Osborn v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. 103 N.W. 879 Minn. 1905
Osborn v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. 103 N.W. 879 Minn. 1905
In Ziebarth v. Nye, 42 Minn. 541 , , it appeared that the defendant, as a town officer, had constructed a highway over and across plaintiff’s land by digging ditches and throwing up an embankment or turnpike.
Town of Campbell v. Waite 87 N.W. 782 Minn. 1901
Town of Campbell v. Waite 87 N.W. 782 Minn. 1901
Ziebarth v. Nye, 42 Minn. 5 ^1, .
King v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 82 N.W. 1113 Minn. 1900
King v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 82 N.W. 1113 Minn. 1900
Co., 39 Minn. 451 , ; Thompson v. Myrick, 24 Minn. 4 ; Ziebarth v. Nye, 42 Minn. 541 , ; O’Brien v. Manwaring, 79 Minn. 86 , .