Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mitchell v. Mitchell, 44 N.W. 885.
- In Re Estate of Mazanec 283 N.W. 745 Minn. 1939
- Mazanec v. Huna 283 N.W. 745 Minn. 1939
-
Mazanec v. Huna
283 N.W. 745
Minn. 1939
In re Storer’s Will, 28 Minn. 9, 11 , ; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73, 76 , ; In re Hess’ Will, 48 Minn. 504, 512 , , 31 A. S. R. 665; Tyner v. Varien, 97 Minn. 181, 182 , ; In re Estate of Jenks, 164 Minn. 377, 383 , .
-
In Re Estate of Mazanec
283 N.W. 745
Minn. 1939
827 ; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , 76 , 44 N.W.
- Engelson v. Equity Farms, Inc. 247 N.W. 223 Minn. 1933
-
Engelson v. Equity Farms, Inc.
247 N.W. 223
Minn. 1933
In re Will of Storer, 28 Minn. 9 , ; In re Will of Nelson, 39 Minn. 204 , ; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; Howard v. Farr, 115 Minn. 86 , ; 6 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
- In Re Estate of Jenks 205 N.W. 271 Minn. 1925
-
In Re Estate of Jenks
205 N.W. 271
Minn. 1925
Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; In Re Hess’ Will, 48 Minn. 504 , , 31 Am.
- In re the Estate of Jernberg 190 N.W. 990 Minn. 1922
-
In re the Estate of Jernberg
190 N.W. 990
Minn. 1922
The real question is, was the mind of the testator so controlled by the influence of another, however exerted, that the testator was not left to act voluntarily and understanding^, Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , , or, was the free agency of the testator destroyed at the time the will was made and the will of another substituted for her own.
- Rasmussen ex rel. Lehman v. Evans 185 N.W. 297 Minn. 1921
-
Rasmussen ex rel. Lehman v. Evans
185 N.W. 297
Minn. 1921
Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; Schmidt v. Schmidt, 47 Minn. 451 , ; Buck v. *321 Buck, 122 Minn. 463 , , and cases cited.
- Thill v. Freiermuth 156 N.W. 260 Minn. 1916
-
Thill v. Freiermuth
156 N.W. 260
Minn. 1916
Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; Schmidt v. Schmidt, 47 Minn. 451 , 50 N W. 598; In re Hess’ Will, 48 Minn. 504 , 51 N W. 614, 31 Am.
- Lewis v. Murray 155 N.W. 392 Minn. 1915
-
Lewis v. Murray
155 N.W. 392
Minn. 1915
He must be able to understand and carry in his mind in a general way the nature and situation of his property, and his relations to those who would naturally have some claim to his remembrance.” See in re Nelson’s Will, 39 Minn. 204 , ; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; Hammond v. Dike, 42 Minn. 273 , , 18 Am.
- Butler v. Badger 150 N.W. 233 Minn. 1914
-
Butler v. Badger
150 N.W. 233
Minn. 1914
Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; Howard v. Farr, 115 Minn. 86 , .
- Buck v. Buck 142 N.W. 729 Minn. 1913
-
Buck v. Buck
142 N.W. 729
Minn. 1913
Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; In re Hess’ Will, 48 Minn. 504 , , 31 Am.
- Howard v. Farr 131 N.W. 1071 Minn. 1911
-
Howard v. Farr
131 N.W. 1071
Minn. 1911
Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; In re Nelson’s Will, 39 Minn. 204 , ; Schmidt v. Schmidt, 47 Minn. 451 , ; In re Hess’ Will, 48 Minn. 504 , , 31 Am.
- Tyner v. Varien 106 N.W. 898 Minn. 1906
-
Tyner v. Varien
106 N.W. 898
Minn. 1906
Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , .
- Prescott v. Johnson 97 N.W. 891 Minn. 1904
-
Prescott v. Johnson
97 N.W. 891
Minn. 1904
In re Nelson, 39 Minn. 205 , ; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; Graham v. Burch, 44 Minn. 33 , ; In re Hess, 48 Minn. 504 , .
- Foster v. Dearborn 51 N.W. 614 Minn. 1892
-
Foster v. Dearborn
51 N.W. 614
Minn. 1892
143 ;) Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ( 44 N. W. Rep.
- Schmidt v. Schmidt 50 N.W. 598 Minn. 1891
-
Schmidt v. Schmidt
50 N.W. 598
Minn. 1891
143 ;) Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ( 44 N. W. Rep.
- Graham v. Burch 49 N.W. 697 Minn. 1891
-
Graham v. Burch
49 N.W. 697
Minn. 1891
§ 688; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ( 44 N. W. Rep.