Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mitchell v. Mitchell, 44 N.W. 885.

32 citing documents.

  • In Re Estate of Mazanec 283 N.W. 745 Minn. 1939
  • Mazanec v. Huna 283 N.W. 745 Minn. 1939
  • Mazanec v. Huna 283 N.W. 745 Minn. 1939
    In re Storer’s Will, 28 Minn. 9, 11 , ; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73, 76 , ; In re Hess’ Will, 48 Minn. 504, 512 , , 31 A. S. R. 665; Tyner v. Varien, 97 Minn. 181, 182 , ; In re Estate of Jenks, 164 Minn. 377, 383 , .
  • In Re Estate of Mazanec 283 N.W. 745 Minn. 1939
    827 ; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , 76 , 44 N.W.
  • Engelson v. Equity Farms, Inc. 247 N.W. 223 Minn. 1933
  • Engelson v. Equity Farms, Inc. 247 N.W. 223 Minn. 1933
    In re Will of Storer, 28 Minn. 9 , ; In re Will of Nelson, 39 Minn. 204 , ; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; Howard v. Farr, 115 Minn. 86 , ; 6 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
  • In Re Estate of Jenks 205 N.W. 271 Minn. 1925
  • In Re Estate of Jenks 205 N.W. 271 Minn. 1925
    Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; In Re Hess’ Will, 48 Minn. 504 , , 31 Am.
  • In re the Estate of Jernberg 190 N.W. 990 Minn. 1922
  • In re the Estate of Jernberg 190 N.W. 990 Minn. 1922
    The real question is, was the mind of the testator so controlled by the influence of another, however exerted, that the testator was not left to act voluntarily and understanding^, Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , , or, was the free agency of the testator destroyed at the time the will was made and the will of another substituted for her own.
  • Rasmussen ex rel. Lehman v. Evans 185 N.W. 297 Minn. 1921
  • Rasmussen ex rel. Lehman v. Evans 185 N.W. 297 Minn. 1921
    Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; Schmidt v. Schmidt, 47 Minn. 451 , ; Buck v. *321 Buck, 122 Minn. 463 , , and cases cited.
  • Thill v. Freiermuth 156 N.W. 260 Minn. 1916
  • Thill v. Freiermuth 156 N.W. 260 Minn. 1916
    Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; Schmidt v. Schmidt, 47 Minn. 451 , 50 N W. 598; In re Hess’ Will, 48 Minn. 504 , 51 N W. 614, 31 Am.
  • Lewis v. Murray 155 N.W. 392 Minn. 1915
  • Lewis v. Murray 155 N.W. 392 Minn. 1915
    He must be able to understand and carry in his mind in a general way the nature and situation of his property, and his relations to those who would naturally have some claim to his remembrance.” See in re Nelson’s Will, 39 Minn. 204 , ; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; Hammond v. Dike, 42 Minn. 273 , , 18 Am.
  • Butler v. Badger 150 N.W. 233 Minn. 1914
  • Butler v. Badger 150 N.W. 233 Minn. 1914
    Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; Howard v. Farr, 115 Minn. 86 , .
  • Buck v. Buck 142 N.W. 729 Minn. 1913
  • Buck v. Buck 142 N.W. 729 Minn. 1913
    Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; In re Hess’ Will, 48 Minn. 504 , , 31 Am.
  • Howard v. Farr 131 N.W. 1071 Minn. 1911
  • Howard v. Farr 131 N.W. 1071 Minn. 1911
    Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; In re Nelson’s Will, 39 Minn. 204 , ; Schmidt v. Schmidt, 47 Minn. 451 , ; In re Hess’ Will, 48 Minn. 504 , , 31 Am.
  • Tyner v. Varien 106 N.W. 898 Minn. 1906
  • Tyner v. Varien 106 N.W. 898 Minn. 1906
    Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , .
  • Prescott v. Johnson 97 N.W. 891 Minn. 1904
  • Prescott v. Johnson 97 N.W. 891 Minn. 1904
    In re Nelson, 39 Minn. 205 , ; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ; Graham v. Burch, 44 Minn. 33 , ; In re Hess, 48 Minn. 504 , .
  • Foster v. Dearborn 51 N.W. 614 Minn. 1892
  • Foster v. Dearborn 51 N.W. 614 Minn. 1892
    143 ;) Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ( 44 N. W. Rep.
  • Schmidt v. Schmidt 50 N.W. 598 Minn. 1891
  • Schmidt v. Schmidt 50 N.W. 598 Minn. 1891
    143 ;) Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ( 44 N. W. Rep.
  • Graham v. Burch 49 N.W. 697 Minn. 1891
  • Graham v. Burch 49 N.W. 697 Minn. 1891
    § 688; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 43 Minn. 73 , ( 44 N. W. Rep.