Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hanford v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad, 42 N.W. 596.
- Reads Landing Campers Ass'n v. Township of Pepin 533 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Reads Landing Campers Ass'n v. Township of Pepin
533 N.W.2d 45
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Paul & D. R.R., 43 Minn. 104, 112-14 , 44 N.W.
- McLafferty v. St. Aubin 500 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
McLafferty v. St. Aubin
500 N.W.2d 165
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Paul & Duluth R.R., 43 Minn. 104 , 42 N.W.
- State v. Slotness 185 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1971
-
State v. Slotness
185 N.W.2d 530
Minn. 1971
R. Co. 43 Minn. 104, 113 , , , 1146, “that such lands, not available for the public purposes for which alone the state exercises authority over them, shall be improved and used for profitable enterprises, rather than that they lie forever waste and unproductive.” The state, moreover, by establishing lines of na
- Farnes v. Freeman Lane 161 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1968
-
Farnes v. Freeman Lane
161 N.W.2d 297
Minn. 1968
Paul & D. R. Co. 43 Minn. 104 , , 7 L. R. A. 722; Village of Wayzata v. G. N. Ry.
- State v. Longyear Holding Co. 29 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1947
-
State v. Longyear Holding Co.
29 N.W.2d 657
Minn. 1947
Paul & Duluth R. Co. 43 Minn. 104 , , , 7 L. R. A. 722; Shell v. Matteson, 81 Minn. 38 , ; and State v. Korrer, 127 Minn. 60 , , L. R. A. 1916C, 139.
- Petraborg v. Zontelli 15 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1944
-
Petraborg v. Zontelli
15 N.W.2d 174
Minn. 1944
P. & D. R. Co. 43 Minn. 104 , , , 7 L. R. A. 722.
- Nelson v. Delong 7 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1942
-
Nelson v. Delong
7 N.W.2d 342
Minn. 1942
Paul & Duluth R. Co. 43 Minn. 104 , , , *431 7 L. R. A. 722 (on reargument).
- Meyers v. Lafayette Club, Inc. 266 N.W. 861 Minn. 1936
-
Meyers v. Lafayette Club, Inc.
266 N.W. 861
Minn. 1936
Paul & D. R. Co. 43 Minn. 104 , , , 7 L. R. A. 722.
- Stavanau v. Gray 172 N.W. 885 Minn. 1919
-
Stavanau v. Gray
172 N.W. 885
Minn. 1919
Paul & D. R. Co. 43 Minn. 104 , , , 7 L.R.A.
- Troska v. Brecht 167 N.W. 1042 Minn. 1918
-
Troska v. Brecht
167 N.W. 1042
Minn. 1918
Paul & D. R. Co. 43 Minn. 104 , , , 7 L. R. A. 722; Wait v. May, 48 Minn. 453 , , among other cases; and argue that as the existence of a city street along the' shore does not relieve a railway company which constructs its railroad in the street along the shore from liability to the owner of the fee for dama
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. Brastad 151 N.W. 198 Minn. 1915
-
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Brastad
151 N.W. 198
Minn. 1915
Paul & Duluth R. Co. 43 Minn. 104, 111 , , , 7 L.R.A.
- State v. Korrer 148 N.W. 617 Minn. 1914
-
State v. Korrer
148 N.W. 617
Minn. 1914
Paul & Duluth P. Co. 43 Minn. 104 , , , 7 L.R.A.
- Gridley v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 126 N.W. 897 Minn. 1910
-
Gridley v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
126 N.W. 897
Minn. 1910
Co., 43 Minn. 104 , , , 7 L. R. A. 722, in which it was held that riparian rights could be severed and transferred apart from the shore.
- White v. Jefferson 124 N.W. 373 Minn. 1910
-
White v. Jefferson
124 N.W. 373
Minn. 1910
Paul & D. R. Co., 43 Minn. 104 , , , 7 L.R.A.
- Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co. 107 N.W. 405 Minn. 1906
-
Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.
107 N.W. 405
Minn. 1906
Paul & D. R. Co., 43 Minn. 104 , , , 7 L. R. A. 722; Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. *444 181 , ,18 L. R. A. 670, 38 Am.
- State v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad 84 N.W. 302 Minn. 1900
-
State v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad
84 N.W. 302
Minn. 1900
Paul & D. R. Co., 43 Minn. 104 , , ; Gilbert v. Eldridge, 47 Minn. 210 , .
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. Scott & Holston Lumber Co. 75 N.W. 737 Minn. 1898
-
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Scott & Holston Lumber Co.
75 N.W. 737
Minn. 1898
Paul & D. R. Co., 43 Minn. 110 , , and .
- Bradshaw v. Duluth Imperial Mill Co. 53 N.W. 1066 Minn. 1892
-
Bradshaw v. Duluth Imperial Mill Co.
53 N.W. 1066
Minn. 1892
Paul & Duluth R. Co., 43 Minn. 104 , ( 42 N. W. Rep.
- City of Duluth v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad 51 N.W. 1163 Minn. 1892
-
City of Duluth v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad
51 N.W. 1163
Minn. 1892
Paul & D. R. Co., 43 Minn. 104 , ( 42 N. W. Rep.
- Minneapolis Trust Co. v. Eastman 50 N.W. 82 Minn. 1891
-
Minneapolis Trust Co. v. Eastman
50 N.W. 82
Minn. 1891
Paul & Duluth R. Co., 43 Minn. 104 , ( 42 N. W. Rep.
- Gilbert v. Eldridge 49 N.W. 679 Minn. 1891
-
Gilbert v. Eldridge
49 N.W. 679
Minn. 1891
Paul & Duluth R. Co., 43 Minn. 104 , ( 42 N. W. Rep.