cl-8011579
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Schmidt v. McCarthy
Cited by
- Sjoblom v. Mark 114 N.W. 746 Minn. 1908
Opinion text
Gilfillan, C. J. There is no merit in either assignment of error. Even had defendant been technically entitled, as a part of his cross-examination of the witness Mrs. McCarthy, to ask the questions which the court below excluded, it is apparent that he could not have been prejudiced by their exclusion. They were so manifestly immaterial that no conceivable answers that the witness might have made could in any way have affected the result. Order affirmed.