Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Lum v. Archibald, 45 N.W. 606.

34 citing documents.

Springborg v. WILSON & CO. INC. 95 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 1959
Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 68 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1955
Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 68 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1955
Lum v. Archibald, 43 Minn. 328, 333 , .
State Ex Rel. Traeger v. Carleton 64 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1954
State Ex Rel. Traeger v. Carleton 64 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1954
Lum v. Archibald, 43 Minn. 328 , .
State v. City of Duluth 56 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1952
State v. City of Duluth 56 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1952
Lum v. Archibald, 43 Minn. 328 , ; Gaston v. Merriam, 33 Minn. 271 , ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
State Ex Rel. Brenner v. Hodapp 48 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1951
State Ex Rel. Brenner v. Hodapp 48 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1951
In line with the general current of authority, this court has held that the writ will not be issued when it would be of no avail, State v. Archibald, 43 Minn. 328 , ; or when it is sought to compel the performance of an act having an illegal object in view, *369 State v. Hill, 32 Minn. 275 , ; or to compel a technical compliance with the letter of the law which would be contrary to the spirit of the law, State v. U. S. Exp.
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Haveland 25 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1946
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Haveland 25 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1946
Lum v. Archibald, 43 Minn. 328, 333 , , a similar case, this court held: “* * * the assessment-books placed in his [the assessor’s] hands had long been returned to the auditor when the order appealed from was made.
Ausman v. Hoffmann 292 N.W. 421 Minn. 1940
Ausman v. Hoffmann 292 N.W. 421 Minn. 1940
Lum v. Archibald, 43 Minn. 328 , .
Phelps v. City of Minneapolis 219 N.W. 872 Minn. 1928
Phelps v. City of Minneapolis 219 N.W. 872 Minn. 1928
Lum v. Archibald, 43 Minn. 328 , ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Phillips v. Neisen 217 N.W. 371 Minn. 1928
State Ex Rel. Phillips v. Neisen 217 N.W. 371 Minn. 1928
State v. Archibald, 43 Minn. 328 , ; Dexner v. Houghton, 153 Minn. 284 , ; State ex rel.
Borgerding v. Village of Freeport 207 N.W. 309 Minn. 1926
Borgerding v. Village of Freeport 207 N.W. 309 Minn. 1926
State v. Archibald, 43 Minn. 328, 330 , .
State ex rel. Village of Chisholm v. Trask 193 N.W. 121 Minn. 1923
State ex rel. Village of Chisholm v. Trask 193 N.W. 121 Minn. 1923
Thus in State v. Archibald, 43 Minn. 328 , , it was *217 held that mandamus would not issue requiring an assessor to proceed with the assessment of property when at the date of the hearing the time in which the assessment could be made under the statute had passed.
Dexner v. Houghton 190 N.W. 179 Minn. 1922
Dexner v. Houghton 190 N.W. 179 Minn. 1922
In line with the general current of authority, this court has held that the writ will not be issued when it would be of no avail, State v. Archibald, 43 Minn. 328 , ; or when it is sought to compel the performance of an act having an illegal object in view, State v. Hill, 32 Minn. 275 , ; or to compel a technical compliance with the letter of the law which would be contrary to the spirit of the law, State v. U. S. Exp.
State ex rel. Metcalf v. Baker 130 N.W. 999 Minn. 1911
State ex rel. Metcalf v. Baker 130 N.W. 999 Minn. 1911
It was held in State v. Archibald, 43 Minn. 328 , , that to justify a court in holding that an act of the legislature is repealed by one subsequently passed, it must appear that the later provision is clearly in hostility to the former.
State ex rel. Seng v. Peter 112 N.W. 866 Minn. 1907
State ex rel. Seng v. Peter 112 N.W. 866 Minn. 1907
The court pertinently remarked in State v. Archibald, 43 Minn. 328 , , that, “to justify a court in holding that an act is repealed by one subsequently passed, it must appear that the later provision is certainly and clearly in hostility to the former.
State ex rel. Townsend v. Board of Park Commissioners 110 N.W. 1121 Minn. 1907
State ex rel. School District No. 51 v. Bailer 97 N.W. 670 Minn. 1903
State ex rel. School District No. 51 v. Bailer 97 N.W. 670 Minn. 1903
Paul, 21 Minn. 421 ; State v. Archibald, 43 Minn. 328 , ; State v. McCardy, 62 Minn. 509 , ; State v. Egan, 64 Minn. 331 , .
Baldinger v. Rockford Insurance Co. of Illinois 82 N.W. 1083 Minn. 1900
Baldinger v. Rockford Insurance Co. of Illinois 82 N.W. 1083 Minn. 1900
State v. Archibald, 43 Minn. 328, 330 , .
State ex rel. Childs v. Routh 63 N.W. 621 Minn. 1895
State ex rel. Childs v. Routh 63 N.W. 621 Minn. 1895
State v. Archibald, 48 Minn. 328 , ; 1 Dillon, Mun.