Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hutchins v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co., 46 N.W. 79.

29 citing documents.

Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. 314 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1982
Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. 314 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1982
Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co., 44 Minn. 5, 9 , 46 N.W.
Peterson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad 244 N.W. 823 Minn. 1932
Peterson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad 244 N.W. 823 Minn. 1932
Peterson v. Pete-Erickson Co. 244 N.W. 68 Minn. 1932
Peterson v. Pete-Erickson Co. 244 N.W. 68 Minn. 1932
Co. 44 Minn. 5 , ; Noe v. G. N. Ry.
Nahan v. Stevenson 234 N.W. 297 Minn. 1931
Nahan v. Stevenson 234 N.W. 297 Minn. 1931
State ex rel. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Probate Court 184 N.W. 43 Minn. 1921
State ex rel. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Probate Court 184 N.W. 43 Minn. 1921
Co. 44 Minn. 5 , ; Brown’s Admr.
Fridley v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank 162 N.W. 454 Minn. 1917
Fridley v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank 162 N.W. 454 Minn. 1917
Co. 44 Minn. 5 , ; Ladd v. Weiskopf, 62 Minn. 29 , , 69 L.R.A.
Lundeen v. Great Northern Railway Co. 150 N.W. 1088 Minn. 1915
Lundeen v. Great Northern Railway Co. 150 N.W. 1088 Minn. 1915
Co. 44 Minn. 5 , , the verdict was reduced from $3,500 to $2,000.
Boos v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 149 N.W. 660 Minn. 1914
Boos v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 149 N.W. 660 Minn. 1914
Vukmirovich v. Nickolich 143 N.W. 255 Minn. 1913
Vukmirovich v. Nickolich 143 N.W. 255 Minn. 1913
Co. 44 Minn. 5 , , held, upon grounds which have since remained unassailed, and are not here questioned, that the probate court had jurisdiction to appoint an administrator for the sole purpose of enforcing such a claim, the intestate there having been a nonresident without property.
Austro-Hungarian Consul v. G. A. Westphal 139 N.W. 300 Minn. 1912
Austro-Hungarian Consul v. G. A. Westphal 139 N.W. 300 Minn. 1912
Co. 44 Minn. 5 , ; Foot v. Great Northern Ry.
Hanson v. Nygaard 117 N.W. 235 Minn. 1908
Hanson v. Nygaard 117 N.W. 235 Minn. 1908
Aho v. Republic Iron & Steel Co. 116 N.W. 590 Minn. 1908
Aho v. Republic Iron & Steel Co. 116 N.W. 590 Minn. 1908
Co., 44 Minn. 5 , State v. Probate Court of Dakota County, 51 Minn. 241 , ; Foot v. Great Northern Ry.
Beaulieu v. Great Northern Railway Co. 114 N.W. 353 Minn. 1907
Beaulieu v. Great Northern Railway Co. 114 N.W. 353 Minn. 1907
Co., 44 Minn. 5 , ; Blake v. Midland Ry.
Bremer v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 105 N.W. 494 Minn. 1905
Bremer v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 105 N.W. 494 Minn. 1905
Co., 44 Minn. 5 , , “no compensation can be given for wounded feelings, or for the loss of the comfort or companionship of a relative nor for the pain and suffering of the deceased.
Gunderson v. Northwestern Elevator Co. 49 N.W. 694 Minn. 1891