Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Reynolds v. Franklin, 46 N.W. 139.

30 citing documents.

  • Tysk v. Griggs 91 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 1958
  • Tysk v. Griggs 91 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 1958
    * * * % ‡ % ijs “We see no reason to doubt the correctness of the rule adopted in Reynolds v. Franklin [ 44 Minn. 30 , ], and cases following it.
  • Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc. 74 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1955
  • Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc. 74 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1955
    kins v. Meyerton, 190 Minn. 542, 545 , , 560; Townsend v. Jahr, 147 Minn. 30 , ; Brody v. Foster, 134 Minn. 91 , , L. R. A. 1916F, 780; Nelson v. Gjestrum, 118 Minn. 284 , ; Vilett v. Moler, 82 Minn. 12 , ; Wallace v. Hallowell, 56 Minn. 501 , ; Stickney v. Jordan, 47 Minn. 262 , ; Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , , 20 A. S. R. 540; Rockefeller v. Merritt (8 Cir.) 76 F. 909 , 35 L. R. A. 633; Tischer v. Bardin, 155 Minn. 361 , .
  • Marion v. Miller 55 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 1952
  • Marion v. Miller 55 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 1952
    Cf. Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , .
  • Rosenquist v. Baker 35 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1948
  • Rosenquist v. Baker 35 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1948
    Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , , 20 A. S. R. 540; Townsend v. Jahr, 147 Minn. 30 , .
  • Townsend v. Jahr 179 N.W. 486 Minn. 1920
  • Townsend v. Jahr 179 N.W. 486 Minn. 1920
    Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , , 20 Am.
  • Shane v. Jacobson 162 N.W. 472 Minn. 1917
  • Shane v. Jacobson 162 N.W. 472 Minn. 1917
    Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , , 20 Am.
  • Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 148 N.W. 67 Minn. 1914
  • Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 148 N.W. 67 Minn. 1914
    Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , , 20 Am.
  • Walsh v. Paine 143 N.W. 718 Minn. 1913
  • Walsh v. Paine 143 N.W. 718 Minn. 1913
    137, and cases; Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , , 29 Am.
  • Nelson v. Gjestrum 136 N.W. 858 Minn. 1912
  • Nelson v. Gjestrum 136 N.W. 858 Minn. 1912
    And further it is said that this court, by the decisions in Fleckten v. Spicer, 63 Minn. 454 , ; Brown v. Doyle, 69 Minn. 543 , ; Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224 , ; Howe v. Coates, 90 Minn. 508 , , and Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , , has receded from the rule first established by the decision of Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , , 20 Am.
  • Selover, Bates & Co. v. Freeman 127 N.W. 9 Minn. 1910
  • Selover, Bates & Co. v. Freeman 127 N.W. 9 Minn. 1910
    On the motion for a new trial the court properly adopted the rule of damages announced in Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , , 20 Am.
  • Knight v. Leighton 124 N.W. 1090 Minn. 1910
  • Knight v. Leighton 124 N.W. 1090 Minn. 1910
    Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , , 20 Am.
  • Ritko v. Grove 113 N.W. 629 Minn. 1907
  • Ritko v. Grove 113 N.W. 629 Minn. 1907
    Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , , 20 Am.
  • Vilett v. Moler 84 N.W. 452 Minn. 1900
  • Vilett v. Moler 84 N.W. 452 Minn. 1900
    Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 80 , .
  • Wallace v. Hallowell 58 N.W. 292 Minn. 1894
  • Wallace v. Hallowell 58 N.W. 292 Minn. 1894
    Ct. 39;) Peek v. Derry, 37 Ch. Div. 541; Crater v. Binninger, 33 N. J. Law, 513; Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , ( ;) Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , ( ;) Alden v. Wright, 47 Minn. 225 , ( ;) Stickney v. Jordan, 47 Minn. 262 , ( ;) Fixen v. Blake, 47 Minn. 540 , ( .)
  • Stickney v. Jordan 49 N.W. 980 Minn. 1891
  • Stickney v. Jordan 49 N.W. 980 Minn. 1891
    Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , ( 46 N. W. Rep.