Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Crooks v. Nippolt, 46 N.W. 349.

25 citing documents.

Proulx v. Hirsch Bros. Inc. 155 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1968
Proulx v. Hirsch Bros. Inc. 155 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1968
Luke’s Hospital Assn. 122 Minn. 444 , ; Bakke v. Keller, supra; Crooks v. Nippolt, 44 Minn. 239 , ; Wagner v. Magee, 130 Minn. 162 , .
Beck v. Northwestern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 288 N.W. 217 Minn. 1939
Beck v. Northwestern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 288 N.W. 217 Minn. 1939
R. 182, states the law: “Any act of ratification of the contract, after knowledge of the facts authorizing a rescission, amounts to an affirmance and ter *132 ruinates the right to rescind; but, if done before such knowledge, it will have no such effect.” To the same effect are Crooks v. Nippolt, 44 Minn. 239 , ; Marshall v. Gilman, 47 Minn. 131 , ; Parsons v. McKinley, 56 Minn. 464, 468 , ; O’Neil v. Davidson, 147 Minn. 240 , .
Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Anderson 253 N.W. 885 Minn. 1934
Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Anderson 253 N.W. 885 Minn. 1934
Thompson v. Libby, 36 Minn. 287 , ; Crooks v. Nippolt, 44 Minn. 239 , ; O’Neil v. Davidson, 147 Minn. 240 , ; Moe v. Shaffer, 150 Minn. 114 , , 18 A. L. R. 1194; Farmers State Bank v. Miller, 168 Minn. 199 , .
United States Installment Realty Co. v. DeLancy Co. 188 N.W. 212 Minn. 1922
United States Installment Realty Co. v. DeLancy Co. 188 N.W. 212 Minn. 1922
Thompson v. Libby, 36 Minn. 287 , ; Crooks v. Nippolt, 44 Minn. 239 , ; MInazek v. Libera, 83 Minn. 288 , ; Neibuhr v. Gage, 99 Minn. 149 , , ; Arcade Inv.
O'Neil v. Davidson 180 N.W. 102 Minn. 1920
O'Neil v. Davidson 180 N.W. 102 Minn. 1920
Bell v. Baker, 43 Minn. 86 , ; Crooks v. Nippolt, 44 Minn. 239 , ; Marshall v. Gilman, 47 Minn. 131 , ; Parsons v. McKinley, 56 Minn. 464 , ; Arcade Inv.
Bauer v. O'Brien Land Co. 174 N.W. 736 Minn. 1919
Bauer v. O'Brien Land Co. 174 N.W. 736 Minn. 1919
Crooks v. Nippolt, 44 Minn. 239 , ; Wagner v. Magee, 130 Minn. 162 , .
Encyclopedia Press, Inc. v. Harris 167 N.W. 363 Minn. 1918
Encyclopedia Press, Inc. v. Harris 167 N.W. 363 Minn. 1918
Crooks v. Nippolt, 44 Minn. 239 , .
Arcade Investment Co. v. Hawley 165 N.W. 477 Minn. 1917
Arcade Investment Co. v. Hawley 165 N.W. 477 Minn. 1917
Crooks v. Nippolt, 44 Minn. 239 , ; Parsons v. McKinley, 56 Minn. 464 , .
State ex rel. Klemer v. District Court 155 N.W. 1057 Minn. 1916
State v. District Court of Ramsey *102 County, 44 Minn. 244 , ; State v. Probate Court of Dakota County, 51 Minn. 241 , ; State v. District Court of St.
State ex rel. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. City of Ely 151 N.W. 545 Minn. 1915
Paul, 20 Minn. 459 (511); State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 44 Minn. 244 , ; 27 Am.
Mayer v. Knudsen 147 N.W. 819 Minn. 1914
Mayer v. Knudsen 147 N.W. 819 Minn. 1914
We do not depart from the rule announced in Crooks v. Nippolt, 44 Minn. 239 , , and Marshall v. Gilman, 47 Minn. 131 , , that the right of rescission must be exercised promptly and that it is lost by waiver or affirmance.
Kline v. Kline 128 P. 805 Ariz. 1912
Keough v. City of St. Paul 68 N.W. 843 Minn. 1896
The cases on which the city relies as sustaining its contention are State v. District Court, 44 Minn. 244 , ; State v. District Court Judges, 51 Minn. 539 , , and ; and Sang v. Duluth City, 58 Minn. 81 , .
State ex rel. City of Duluth v. District Court 60 N.W. 546 Minn. 1894
v. District Court of Ramsey Co., 44 Minn. 244 , ( .)
Parsons v. McKinley 57 N.W. 1134 Minn. 1894
Parsons v. McKinley 57 N.W. 1134 Minn. 1894
See, also, Crooks v. Nippolt, 44 Minn. 239 , ( .)