Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite MacLaren v. Cochran, 46 N.W. 408.

27 citing documents.

Moberg v. Commercial Credit Corp. 42 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1950
Moberg v. Commercial Credit Corp. 42 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1950
See, also, MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255 , ; Cochran v. Stewart, 57 Minn. 499 , ; Ammon v. Gamble-Robinson Comm.
Blumberg v. Taggart 5 N.W.2d 388 Minn. 1942
Blumberg v. Taggart 5 N.W.2d 388 Minn. 1942
1927, § 8089: “No implied or resulting trust shall be alleged or established to defeat or prejudice the title of a purchaser for a valuable consideration, and without notice of such trust.” The following cases, amongst others, uphold the rule: Cochran v. Stewart, 21 Minn. 435, 438 ; MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255, 257 , ; Newton v. Newton, 46 Minn. 33, 37 , ; 18 Minn. *44 L. Rev. 366; 25 Minn. L. Rev. 674 , 689; United States v. Dunn, 268 U. S. 121, 132 , 45 S. Ct. 451 , 69 L. ed. 876; 4 Boge
Gustafson v. Equitable Loan Assn. 243 N.W. 106 Minn. 1932
Gustafson v. Equitable Loan Assn. 243 N.W. 106 Minn. 1932
Co. 44 Minn. 153 , ; Warder, B. & G. Co. v. Rublee, 42 Minn. 23 , ; MacLaren v. Cochran, Jr. 44 Minn. 255 , ; Cochran v. Stewart, 57 Minn. 499 , ; Ammon v. Gamble-Robinson Comm.
Hirschman v. Healy 202 N.W. 734 Minn. 1925
Hirschman v. Healy 202 N.W. 734 Minn. 1925
Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255 , ; Knappen v. Freeman, 47 Minn. 491 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Fawkes v. Scott, 138 Minn. 384 , ; Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , .
Kirby v. Dean 199 N.W. 174 Minn. 1924
Kirby v. Dean 199 N.W. 174 Minn. 1924
In such a case, “the party in the wrong should not' be heard to say that no real injury can result from the fact misrepresented.” MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255 (258), .
National Cash Register Co. v. Merrigan 181 N.W. 585 Minn. 1921
National Cash Register Co. v. Merrigan 181 N.W. 585 Minn. 1921
MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255 , ; Ludowese v. Amidon, 124 Minn. 288, 292 , .
Fawkes v. Knapp 165 N.W. 236 Minn. 1917
Fawkes v. Knapp 165 N.W. 236 Minn. 1917
Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; MacLaren v. Cockran, 44 Minn. 255 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Ludowese v. Amidon, 124 Minn. 288 , .
Johnson v. Olsen 158 N.W. 805 Minn. 1916
Johnson v. Olsen 158 N.W. 805 Minn. 1916
MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255 , .
Shelling State Bank v. Clasen 157 N.W. 643 Minn. 1916
Shelling State Bank v. Clasen 157 N.W. 643 Minn. 1916
Bank v. Holán, 63 Minn. 525 , ; Bank of Montreal v. Richter, 55 Minn. 362 , ; MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255 , ; 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Edward Thompson Co. v. Schroeder 154 N.W. 792 Minn. 1915
Edward Thompson Co. v. Schroeder 154 N.W. 792 Minn. 1915
MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255 , .
Cole v. Johnson 149 N.W. 467 Minn. 1914
Cole v. Johnson 149 N.W. 467 Minn. 1914
Judging this issue as made by the pleadings and as submitted to the jury, it would seem that the charge should have been in line with the practice indicated in MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255 , ; Bank of Montreal v. Richter, 55 Minn. 362 , ; Park v. Winsor, 115 Minn. 256 , ; Cochran v. Stein, 118 Minn. 323 , , 41 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Ludowese v. Amidon 144 N.W. 965 Minn. 1914
Ludowese v. Amidon 144 N.W. 965 Minn. 1914
Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255 , ; Knappen v. Freeman, 47 Minn. 491 , ; Nelson v. Carlson, 54 Minn. 90 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , .
Pennington v. Roberge 142 N.W. 710 Minn. 1913
Pennington v. Roberge 142 N.W. 710 Minn. 1913
In MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255 , , this court said: “If.a party is induced to enter into a contract by fraudulent representations as to a fact which he deems material, and upon which he has a right to rely, he may rescind the contract upon the discovery of the fraud, and the party in the wrong should not be heard to say that no real in
Brown v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States 78 N.W. 103 Minn. 1899