DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Redding v. Godwin, 46 N.W. 563.

36 citing documents.

  • Sievers v. Sievers 250 N.W. 574 Minn. 1933
  • Sievers v. Sievers 250 N.W. 574 Minn. 1933
    Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352 , ; Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , .
  • Waggoner v. Gummerum 231 N.W. 10 Minn. 1930
  • Waggoner v. Gummerum 231 N.W. 10 Minn. 1930
    Morrow v. Porter, 161 Minn. 396 , ; Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352 , ; Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , .
  • Heinrich Chemical Co. v. Estate of Bennes 205 N.W. 948 Minn. 1925
  • Heinrich Chemical Co. v. Estate of Bennes 205 N.W. 948 Minn. 1925
    Grant that this was error under the decisions of Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , ; Madson v. Madson, 69 Minn. 37 , ; and other cases cited in Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352, 354 , , it should not reverse, because it relates only to the consideration, an immaterial issue, the verdict, demonstrably being predicated wholly upon misrepres
  • Morrow v. Porter 202 N.W. 53 Minn. 1925
  • Morrow v. Porter 202 N.W. 53 Minn. 1925
    The ease on this point is nearly ruled by Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , .
  • Geisler v. Geisler 200 N.W. 742 Minn. 1924
  • Geisler v. Geisler 200 N.W. 742 Minn. 1924
    Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , .
  • Caldwell Milling & Elevator Co. v. L. L. May Co. 169 N.W. 797 Minn. 1918
  • Caldwell Milling & Elevator Co. v. L. L. May Co. 169 N.W. 797 Minn. 1918
    Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355, 360 , ; McBride v. McBride, 82 Ga.
  • Shane v. Jacobson 162 N.W. 472 Minn. 1917
  • Shane v. Jacobson 162 N.W. 472 Minn. 1917
    Properly the general rule was applied in the cases from this court already cited, and also in Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , ; Alden v. Wright, 47 Minn. 225 , ; Fixen v. Blake, 47 Minn. 540 , ; Mountain v. Day, 91 Minn. 249 , ; Ritko v. Grove, 102 Minn. 312, 316 , ; Knight v. Leighton, 110 Minn. 254 , ; Jones v. Magoon, 119 Minn. 434 , ; for the
  • Magnuson v. Burgess 145 N.W. 32 Minn. 1914
  • Magnuson v. Burgess 145 N.W. 32 Minn. 1914
    Stickney v. Jordan, 47 Minn. 262 , ; Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , .
  • Walsh v. Paine 143 N.W. 718 Minn. 1913
  • Walsh v. Paine 143 N.W. 718 Minn. 1913
    Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , .
  • Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman 141 N.W. 481 Minn. 1913
  • Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman 141 N.W. 481 Minn. 1913
    Co. 40 Minn. 152 , ; Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , ; Madson v. Madson, 69 Minn. 37 , ; Babcock v. Murray, 69 Minn. 199 , ; Robbins v. Legg, 80 Minn. 419 , ; Reeves v. Sawyer, 88 Minn. 218 , ; Veum v. Sheeran, 88 Minn. 257 , .
  • Nelson v. Gjestrum 136 N.W. 858 Minn. 1912
  • Nelson v. Gjestrum 136 N.W. 858 Minn. 1912
    It was first announced in Reynolds v. Franklin, supra, and since followed in Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , ; Stickney v. Jordan, supra; Fixen v. Blake, 47 Minn. 540 , ; Wallace v. Hallowell, 56 Minn. 501 , ; Mountain v. Day, 91 Minn. 249 , ; Ritko v. Grove, 102 Minn. 312 , ; Hanson v. Hellie, 107 Minn. 375 , ; Knight v. Leighton, 110 Minn. 25
  • Reeves v. Sawyer 92 N.W. 962 Minn. 1903
  • Reeves v. Sawyer 92 N.W. 962 Minn. 1903
    Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , ; Madson v. Madson, 69 Minn. 37 , .
  • Robbins v. Legg 83 N.W. 379 Minn. 1900
  • Robbins v. Legg 83 N.W. 379 Minn. 1900
    Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , ; Madson v. Madson, 69 Minn. 37 , .
  • Madson v. Madson 71 N.W. 824 Minn. 1897
  • Madson v. Madson 71 N.W. 824 Minn. 1897
    Thus, in the case of Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , , a competent witness testified that the defendant, in a conversation *40 with the plaintiff’s intestate, made certain fraudulent representations, for which a recovery was sought in that action, and it was held that the defendant could not testify that in the conversation with the deceased he made no su
  • Wallace v. Hallowell 58 N.W. 292 Minn. 1894
  • Wallace v. Hallowell 58 N.W. 292 Minn. 1894
    Ct. 39;) Peek v. Derry, 37 Ch. Div. 541; Crater v. Binninger, 33 N. J. Law, 513; Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , ( ;) Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , ( ;) Alden v. Wright, 47 Minn. 225 , ( ;) Stickney v. Jordan, 47 Minn. 262 , ( ;) Fixen v. Blake, 47 Minn. 540 , ( .)
  • Redding v. Wright 51 N.W. 1056 Minn. 1892
  • Redding v. Wright 51 N.W. 1056 Minn. 1892
    The decision on the former appeal — 44 Minn. 355 , ( 46 N. W. Rep.
  • Stickney v. Jordan 49 N.W. 980 Minn. 1891
  • Stickney v. Jordan 49 N.W. 980 Minn. 1891
    139 ;) Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , ( 46 N. W. Rep.
  • Alden v. Wright 49 N.W. 767 Minn. 1891
  • Alden v. Wright 49 N.W. 767 Minn. 1891
    Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , ( 46 N. W. Rep.