Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Arthur v. Willius, 46 N.W. 851.
- Matter of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties 263 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1978
-
Matter of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties
263 N.W.2d 610
Minn. 1978
468 (1894) (corporation); Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , 46 N.W.
- Sibley County Bank v. Crescent Milling Co. 215 N.W. 521 Minn. 1927
-
Sibley County Bank v. Crescent Milling Co.
215 N.W. 521
Minn. 1927
Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409, 415 , ; Carnegie Dock & Fuel Co. v. Kensington Mills, Inc. 152 Minn. 258 , ; Nortmann-Duffke Co. v. Federal Crushed Stone Co. 167 Minn. 333 , .
- Goldman v. Christy 192 N.W. 360 Minn. 1923
-
Goldman v. Christy
192 N.W. 360
Minn. 1923
Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , ; McKusick v. Seymour, Sabin & Co. 48 Minn. 158 , ; Minneapolis Paper Co. v. Swinburne Printing Co. 66 Minn. 378 , .
- State v. Mortgage Security Co. of Minnesota, Inc. 192 N.W. 348 Minn. 1923
-
State v. Mortgage Security Co. of Minnesota, Inc.
192 N.W. 348
Minn. 1923
Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , ; First Nat.
- Dispatch Printing Co. v. Security Bond & Investment Co. 191 N.W. 601 Minn. 1923
- Kremer v. Tellin 191 N.W. 735 Minn. 1923
-
Dispatch Printing Co. v. Security Bond & Investment Co.
191 N.W. 601
Minn. 1923
It has been said of the proceedings under said chapter 76, before the enactment of the supplementary remedy of chapter 272, p. 315, Laws 1899, that they were “susceptible of being molded into almost any form necessary to accomplish their purpose of securing a full and final adjustment of the rights and liabilities of all parties growing out of the .corporate business.” Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , .
-
Kremer v. Tellin
191 N.W. 735
Minn. 1923
Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409, 415 , 46 N. *269 W. 851 ; First Nat.
- Merchants' National Bank of St. Paul v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co. 95 N.W. 767 Minn. 1903
-
Merchants' National Bank of St. Paul v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.
95 N.W. 767
Minn. 1903
Co., 40 Minn. 343 , ; Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , ; Densmore v. Shepard, 46 Minn. 54 , ; First Nat.
- Hanson v. Davison 76 N.W. 254 Minn. 1898
-
Hanson v. Davison
76 N.W. 254
Minn. 1898
See Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , ; Willis v. Mabon, 48 Minn. 140 , ; State v. Bank of New England, 55 Minn. 139 , ; Harper v. Carroll, 66 Minn. 487 , subdivision 19 of opinion (page 508).
- Northwestern Railroader v. Prior 70 N.W. 869 Minn. 1897
-
Northwestern Railroader v. Prior
70 N.W. 869
Minn. 1897
If the debts of the company remain unsatisfied, the court shall proceed to ascertain the respective liabilities of the directors or other officers, and of the stockholders, and to adjudge the amount payable by each, and enforce the judgment as in other cases.” In speaking of proceedings under chapter 76, it is said in Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409, 412 , .
- Minneapolis Baseball Co. v. City Bank 69 N.W. 331 Minn. 1896
-
Minneapolis Baseball Co. v. City Bank
69 N.W. 331
Minn. 1896
In Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , , it was held that the individual liability of stockholders for the corporate debts might be enforced upon the application of any creditor who is a party to the proceedings, though the plaintiff creditor did not demand in his complaint any such relief.
- Pioneer Fuel Co. v. St. Peter Street Improvement Co. 67 N.W. 217 Minn. 1896
-
Pioneer Fuel Co. v. St. Peter Street Improvement Co.
67 N.W. 217
Minn. 1896
The mere ■questions of practice here considered were evidently not in the minds of the court when giving the opinion in Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , .
- St. Paul Barrel Co. v. Minneapolis Distilling Co. 64 N.W. 1143 Minn. 1895
-
St. Paul Barrel Co. v. Minneapolis Distilling Co.
64 N.W. 1143
Minn. 1895
The rule by which the present case must be determined was fully formulated in Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , , as follows: Only those corporations come within this exception which are organized for the purpose, as stated in their articles of association, of carrying on an exclusively manufacturing business; and if the purposes as thus stated are to carry on both a manufacturing business and other kinds of busi
- National German-American Bank v. St. Anthony Park North Real-Estate Improvement Co. 63 N.W. 1068 Minn. 1895
-
National German-American Bank v. St. Anthony Park North Real-Estate Improvement Co.
63 N.W. 1068
Minn. 1895
Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , .
- Oswald v. St. Paul Globe Publishing Co. 61 N.W. 902 Minn. 1895
-
Oswald v. St. Paul Globe Publishing Co.
61 N.W. 902
Minn. 1895
Mohr v. Minnesota Elevator Co., 40 Minn. 343 , ; Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , ; Densmore v. Shepard, 46 Minn. 54 , ; First Nat.
- First National Bank v. Winona Plow Co. 59 N.W. 997 Minn. 1894
-
First National Bank v. Winona Plow Co.
59 N.W. 997
Minn. 1894
See, also, Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , ( ;) Mohr v. Minnesota Elevator Co., 40 Minn. 343 , ( .)
- Willis v. Mabon 50 N.W. 1110 Minn. 1892
- McKusick v. Seymour, Sabin & Co. 50 N.W. 1114 Minn. 1892
-
Willis v. Mabon
50 N.W. 1110
Minn. 1892
1074 ;) Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , ( 46 N. W. Rep.
-
McKusick v. Seymour, Sabin & Co.
50 N.W. 1114
Minn. 1892
Unless to be overruled, Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , ( 46 N. W. Rep.
- Arthur v. Clarke 49 N.W. 252 Minn. 1891
-
Arthur v. Clarke
49 N.W. 252
Minn. 1891
Collins, J. This appeal was taken by two of the defendants, not appellants heretofore, from the judgment entered against the defend *493 ants after the determination of an appeal taken by some of them from an order refusing a new trial, the opinion being reported in Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , ( 46 N. W. Rep.
- Densmore v. Shepard 48 N.W. 528 Minn. 1891
-
Densmore v. Shepard
48 N.W. 528
Minn. 1891
Arthur v. Willius, 44 Minn. 409 , ( 46 N. W. Rep.