Cited by

Gammon v. Ganfield, 42 Minn. 368 , ; Backdahl v. Grand Lodge, 46 Minn. 61 , ; Rees v. Storms, 101 Minn. 381 , .

Backdahl v. Grand Lodge, 46 Minn. 61, 63 , ; Hoyt v. Lightbody, 98 Minn. 189, 198 , , 116 A. S. R. 358, 8 Ann. Cas.

Backdahl v. Grand Lodge, 46 Minn. 61 , 63 , 48 N.W.

Backdahl v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. 46 Minn. 61 , ; Kosmerl v. Snively, 85 Minn. 228 , .

The presumption that *250 a properly mailed letter will reach the person to whom addressed (Backdahl v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. 46 Minn. 61 , ), has application only when the act of mailing is unquestioned or conclusively established.

In Backdahl v. Grand Lodge, A. O. U. W. 46 Minn. 61 , , an action by the deceased’s heirs at law upon a beneficiary certificate payable to his “legal heirs,” it was held that the decree of distribution of the probate court was not evidence of heirship against the defendant.

Gammon v. Ganfield, 42 Minn. 368 , ; D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Waller, 73 Minn. 52 , ; Backdahl v. Grand Dodge A. O. U. W., 46 Minn. 61 , .

See Backdahl v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W., 46 Minn. 61 , ; 1 Greenleaf, Ev.

The case of Backdahl v. Grand Dodge A. O. U. W., 46 Minn. 61 , , is not in conflict with this rule.

Co., 33 Minn. 176 , ; Backdahl v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W., 46 Minn. 61 , .

This testimony was much stronger and more conclusive than that relied upon and held sufficient in Backdahl v. Grand Lodge, 46 Minn. 61 , .

See, also, Backdahl v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W., 46 Minn. 61 , ( 48 N. W. Rep.