Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Roussain v. Patten, 48 N.W. 1122.
- Breimhorst v. Beckman 35 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1949
-
Breimhorst v. Beckman
35 N.W.2d 719
Minn. 1949
1044, and note; Johnson v. Peterson (1903) 90 Minn. 503 , ; Yanish v. Pioneer Fuel Co. (1896) 64 Minn. 175 , ; Roussain v. Patten (1891) 46 Minn. 308 , ; 11 Minn. L. Rev. 449 .
- State Bank of Round Lake v. Riley 224 N.W. 237 Minn. 1929
-
State Bank of Round Lake v. Riley
224 N.W. 237
Minn. 1929
Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , ; Stensgaard v. St.
- Engenmoen v. Lutroe 190 N.W. 894 Minn. 1922
-
Engenmoen v. Lutroe
190 N.W. 894
Minn. 1922
Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , ; Fritz v. Ramspott, 76 Minn. 489 , ; Fifield v. Norton, 79 Minn. 264 , ; Lloyd v. Simons, 90 Minn. 237 , ; Errett v. Wheeler, 109 Minn. 157 , , 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 816; Shraiberg v. Hanson, 138 Minn. 80 , .
- Messerall v. Dreyer 189 N.W. 446 Minn. 1922
-
Messerall v. Dreyer
189 N.W. 446
Minn. 1922
Jordon v. White, 20 Minn. 91 ; Sumner v. Jones, 27 Minn. 312, 314 , ; Cobb v. Cole, 44 Minn. 278 , ; Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , ; Schmidt v. Schmidt, 47 Minn. 451 , ; Hulett v. Carey, 66 Minn. 327 , , 34 L. R. A. 384, 61 Am.
- Shraiberg v. Hanson 163 N.W. 1032 Minn. 1917
-
Shraiberg v. Hanson
163 N.W. 1032
Minn. 1917
816; Fritz v. Ramspott, 76 Minn. 489 , ; Mead v. Randall, 68 Minn. 233 , ; Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , .
- Peters v. City of Duluth 137 N.W. 390 Minn. 1912
-
Peters v. City of Duluth
137 N.W. 390
Minn. 1912
Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , ; Johnson v. Peterson, 90 Minn. 503 , .
- Henderson v. Murray 121 N.W. 214 Minn. 1909
-
Henderson v. Murray
121 N.W. 214
Minn. 1909
Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , .
- Johnson v. Peterson 97 N.W. 384 Minn. 1903
-
Johnson v. Peterson
97 N.W. 384
Minn. 1903
Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , .
- Fifield v. Norton 82 N.W. 581 Minn. 1900
-
Fifield v. Norton
82 N.W. 581
Minn. 1900
Bank of Farmington v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 , ; Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , .
- Palmer v. Yorks 79 N.W. 587 Minn. 1899
-
Palmer v. Yorks
79 N.W. 587
Minn. 1899
On the other hand, respondents contend that the burden was on them to show that they were innocent purchasers for value, without notice; citing Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , (see also Mead v. Randall, 68 Minn. 233 , ); *22 that, therefore, on the face of the records in the office of the register of deeds, defendants were prima facie the owners of the land, and it-would take parol evidence to show they were not; but plaintiffs were the owners, and that, therefor
- Fritz v. Ramspott 79 N.W. 520 Minn. 1899
-
Fritz v. Ramspott
79 N.W. 520
Minn. 1899
Minor v. Willoughby, 3 Minn. 154 (225); Newton v. Newton, 46 Minn. 33 , ; Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , ; Plymouth Cordage Co. v. Seymour, 67 Minn. 311, 317 , ; Mead v. Randall, 68 Minn. 233 , .
- Nickerson v. Wells-Stone Mercantile Co. 73 N.W. 959 Minn. 1898
-
Nickerson v. Wells-Stone Mercantile Co.
73 N.W. 959
Minn. 1898
Bank v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 ; McNeil v. Finnegan, 33 Minn. 375 ; Wright v. Larson, 51 Minn. 321 ; Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 .
- Mead v. Randall 71 N.W. 31 Minn. 1897
-
Mead v. Randall
71 N.W. 31
Minn. 1897
Bank v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 , ; Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , ; Wright v. Larson, 51 Minn. 321 , .