Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Roussain v. Patten, 48 N.W. 1122.

26 citing documents.

  • Breimhorst v. Beckman 35 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1949
  • Breimhorst v. Beckman 35 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1949
    1044, and note; Johnson v. Peterson (1903) 90 Minn. 503 , ; Yanish v. Pioneer Fuel Co. (1896) 64 Minn. 175 , ; Roussain v. Patten (1891) 46 Minn. 308 , ; 11 Minn. L. Rev. 449 .
  • State Bank of Round Lake v. Riley 224 N.W. 237 Minn. 1929
  • State Bank of Round Lake v. Riley 224 N.W. 237 Minn. 1929
    Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , ; Stensgaard v. St.
  • Engenmoen v. Lutroe 190 N.W. 894 Minn. 1922
  • Engenmoen v. Lutroe 190 N.W. 894 Minn. 1922
    Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , ; Fritz v. Ramspott, 76 Minn. 489 , ; Fifield v. Norton, 79 Minn. 264 , ; Lloyd v. Simons, 90 Minn. 237 , ; Errett v. Wheeler, 109 Minn. 157 , , 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 816; Shraiberg v. Hanson, 138 Minn. 80 , .
  • Messerall v. Dreyer 189 N.W. 446 Minn. 1922
  • Messerall v. Dreyer 189 N.W. 446 Minn. 1922
    Jordon v. White, 20 Minn. 91 ; Sumner v. Jones, 27 Minn. 312, 314 , ; Cobb v. Cole, 44 Minn. 278 , ; Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , ; Schmidt v. Schmidt, 47 Minn. 451 , ; Hulett v. Carey, 66 Minn. 327 , , 34 L. R. A. 384, 61 Am.
  • Shraiberg v. Hanson 163 N.W. 1032 Minn. 1917
  • Shraiberg v. Hanson 163 N.W. 1032 Minn. 1917
    816; Fritz v. Ramspott, 76 Minn. 489 , ; Mead v. Randall, 68 Minn. 233 , ; Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , .
  • Peters v. City of Duluth 137 N.W. 390 Minn. 1912
  • Peters v. City of Duluth 137 N.W. 390 Minn. 1912
    Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , ; Johnson v. Peterson, 90 Minn. 503 , .
  • Henderson v. Murray 121 N.W. 214 Minn. 1909
  • Henderson v. Murray 121 N.W. 214 Minn. 1909
    Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , .
  • Johnson v. Peterson 97 N.W. 384 Minn. 1903
  • Johnson v. Peterson 97 N.W. 384 Minn. 1903
    Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , .
  • Fifield v. Norton 82 N.W. 581 Minn. 1900
  • Fifield v. Norton 82 N.W. 581 Minn. 1900
    Bank of Farmington v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 , ; Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , .
  • Palmer v. Yorks 79 N.W. 587 Minn. 1899
  • Palmer v. Yorks 79 N.W. 587 Minn. 1899
    On the other hand, respondents contend that the burden was on them to show that they were innocent purchasers for value, without notice; citing Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , (see also Mead v. Randall, 68 Minn. 233 , ); *22 that, therefore, on the face of the records in the office of the register of deeds, defendants were prima facie the owners of the land, and it-would take parol evidence to show they were not; but plaintiffs were the owners, and that, therefor
  • Fritz v. Ramspott 79 N.W. 520 Minn. 1899
  • Fritz v. Ramspott 79 N.W. 520 Minn. 1899
    Minor v. Willoughby, 3 Minn. 154 (225); Newton v. Newton, 46 Minn. 33 , ; Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , ; Plymouth Cordage Co. v. Seymour, 67 Minn. 311, 317 , ; Mead v. Randall, 68 Minn. 233 , .
  • Nickerson v. Wells-Stone Mercantile Co. 73 N.W. 959 Minn. 1898
  • Nickerson v. Wells-Stone Mercantile Co. 73 N.W. 959 Minn. 1898
    Bank v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 ; McNeil v. Finnegan, 33 Minn. 375 ; Wright v. Larson, 51 Minn. 321 ; Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 .
  • Mead v. Randall 71 N.W. 31 Minn. 1897
  • Mead v. Randall 71 N.W. 31 Minn. 1897
    Bank v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 , ; Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , ; Wright v. Larson, 51 Minn. 321 , .