Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fairchild v. City of St. Paul, 49 N.W. 325.

42 citing documents.

The City of Minneapolis, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Paul , 46 Minn. 540, 544, 49 N.W.
City of Willmar v. Kvam 769 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
City of Willmar v. Kvam 769 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Paul, 46 Minn. 540 , 49 N.W.
Hebert v. City of Fifty Lakes 744 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2008
Hebert v. City of Fifty Lakes 744 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2008
Paul, 46 Minn. 540, 544 , 49 N.W.
Piche v. Independent School District No. 621 634 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Piche v. Independent School District No. 621 634 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Paul, 46 Minn. 540, 543 , 49 N.W.
City of Minneapolis v. Wurtele 291 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1980
City of Minneapolis v. Wurtele 291 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1980
Paul, 46 Minn. 540, 542 , 49 N.W.
Brooks Investment Co. v. City of Bloomington 232 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 1975
Brooks Investment Co. v. City of Bloomington 232 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 1975
Buck v. City of Winona 135 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1965
Buck v. City of Winona 135 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1965
Paul, 46 Minn. 540, 543 , : “* * * As the legislature is the sole judge of the public necessity which requires or renders expedient the exercise of the power of eminent domain, so it is the exclusive judge of the amount of land, and of the estate in land, which the public end to be subserved requires shall be taken.” Where
Kendrick v. City of St. Paul 6 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 1942
Kendrick v. City of St. Paul 6 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 1942
Paul, 46 Minn. 540 , ; Lawton v. Joesting, 96 Minn. 163 , .
Sanguinetti v. Quon 126 P.2d 804 Ariz. 1942
Barmel v. Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District 277 N.W. 208 Minn. 1938
Barmel v. Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District 277 N.W. 208 Minn. 1938
Paul, 46 Minn. 540, 542 , : “There is nothing better settled than that, the power of eminent domain being an incident of sovereignty, the time, manner, and occasion of its exercise are wholly in the control and discretion of the legislature, except as restrained by the constitution.
State Ex Rel. Benson v. Erickson 239 N.W. 908 Minn. 1931
Hamre v. City of Thief River Falls 184 N.W. 225 Minn. 1921
Hamre v. City of Thief River Falls 184 N.W. 225 Minn. 1921
State ex rel. Twin City Building & Investment Co. v. Houghton 174 N.W. 885 Minn. 1919
State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. District Court of Fourth Judicial District 158 N.W. 240 Minn. 1916
State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. District Court of Fourth Judicial District 158 N.W. 240 Minn. 1916
Paul, 46 Minn. 540 , ; Knoblauch v. City of Minneapolis, 56 Minn. 321 , ; Jane-way v. City of Duluth, 65 Minn. 292 , ; Fohl v. Common Council of Village of Sleepy Eye Lake, 80 Minn. 67 , ; Webb v. Lucas, 125 Minn. 403 , .
State ex rel. Smith v. Van Reed 145 N.W. 967 Minn. 1914
State ex rel. Smith v. Van Reed 145 N.W. 967 Minn. 1914
Paul, 46 Minn. 540 , ; Knoblauch v. City of Minneapolis, 56 Minn. 321 , ; Fohl v. Common Council of Village of Sleepy Eye Lake, 80 Minn. 67 , ; Minneapolis & St.
Smith v. City of Minneapolis 128 N.W. 819 Minn. 1910
Smith v. City of Minneapolis 128 N.W. 819 Minn. 1910
Paul, 46 Minn. 540 , , the court directly considered the matter of the title taken by a city in its streets under a charter provision giving it a fee simple.
Minnesota Debenture Co. v. Scott 119 N.W. 391 Minn. 1908
Minnesota Debenture Co. v. Scott 119 N.W. 391 Minn. 1908
Paul, 46 Minn. 540 , ; Bartlett v. Eau Claire, 112 Wis.
Chambers v. Great Northern Power Co. 110 N.W. 1128 Minn. 1907
Chambers v. Great Northern Power Co. 110 N.W. 1128 Minn. 1907
Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co. 107 N.W. 405 Minn. 1906
Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co. 107 N.W. 405 Minn. 1906
Lawton v. Joesting 104 N.W. 830 Minn. 1905
Lawton v. Joesting 104 N.W. 830 Minn. 1905
Paul, 46 Minn. 540 , ), which would lapse by nonuser; and the language of the deed here before us does not, within the rules we have adverted to, disclose an intention to grant to the city any greater right or title to the lots in question than to those in Robertson’s addition.
Sanborn v. Van Duyne 96 N.W. 41 Minn. 1903
Sanborn v. Van Duyne 96 N.W. 41 Minn. 1903
Stewart v. Great Northern Railway Co. 68 N.W. 208 Minn. 1896
Stewart v. Great Northern Railway Co. 68 N.W. 208 Minn. 1896
Bergen v. Anderson 64 N.W. 561 Minn. 1895
Bergen v. Anderson 64 N.W. 561 Minn. 1895