Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Finlayson v. Crooks, 49 N.W. 398.

28 citing documents.

Shaw Acquisition Co. v. Bank of Elk River 639 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 2002
Shaw Acquisition Co. v. Bank of Elk River 639 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 2002
See, e.g., Finlay son v. Crooks, 47 Minn. 74, 79 , 49 N.W.
Home Lumber Co. v. Kopfmann Homes, Inc. 535 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1995
Home Lumber Co. v. Kopfmann Homes, Inc. 535 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1995
In addition to the statutory provisions, the common law provides that a mechanics lien has priority over certain mortgage payments if the subsequent payments are “optional.” Finlayson v. Crooks, 47 Minn. 74, 79 , 49 N.W.
Zetah v. Isaacs 428 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Zetah v. Isaacs 428 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Finlayson v. Crooks, 47 Minn. 74, 76 , 49 N.W.
Reuben E. Johnson Co. v. Phelps 156 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1968
Reuben E. Johnson Co. v. Phelps 156 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1968
See, Finlayson v. Crooks, 47 Minn. 74 , .
Model Home Building, Inc. v. Turnquist 102 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1960
Model Home Building, Inc. v. Turnquist 102 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1960
2 Finlayson v. Crooks, 47 Minn. 74 , ; Erickson v. Ireland, 134 Minn. 156 , ; 57 C. J. S., Mechanics’ Liens, § 205b; 59 C. J. S., Mortgages, §§ 230a(2), 276b.
Axel Newman Heating & Plumbing Co. v. Sauers 47 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1951
Axel Newman Heating & Plumbing Co. v. Sauers 47 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1951
Finlayson v. Crooks, 47 Minn. 74 , .
Carity Motors, Inc. v. Eichten 249 N.W. 190 Minn. 1933
Carity Motors, Inc. v. Eichten 249 N.W. 190 Minn. 1933
Berry v. O’Connor, 33 Minn. 29 , ; Finlayson v. Crooks, 47 Minn. 74 , ; Anderson v. Liston, 69 Minn. 82 , ; Erickson v. Ireland, 134 Minn. 156 , .
Northland Pine Co. v. Melin Bros. 161 N.W. 407 Minn. 1917
Northland Pine Co. v. Melin Bros. 161 N.W. 407 Minn. 1917
Finlayson v. Crooks, 47 Minn. 74 , .
Erickson v. Ireland 158 N.W. 918 Minn. 1916
Erickson v. Ireland 158 N.W. 918 Minn. 1916
Finlayson v. Crooks, 47 Minn. 74, 78 , .
Jewett v. Iowa Land Co. 67 N.W. 639 Minn. 1896
Jewett v. Iowa Land Co. 67 N.W. 639 Minn. 1896
If the question was merely whether a mortgagee of the premises upon which the mechanic’s lien is claimed can be made a party, for *535 the purpose of having the existence, date, and amount of his mortgage lien determined in the lien action, it would be concluded by the decision of this court in Finlayson v. Crooks, 47 Minn. 74 , .
Gardner v. Leck 54 N.W. 746 Minn. 1893
Gardner v. Leck 54 N.W. 746 Minn. 1893
It was referred to in the main opinion in Finlayson v. Crooks, 47 Minn. 74 , ( 49 N. W. Rep.
Bassett v. Menage 53 N.W. 1064 Minn. 1892
Bassett v. Menage 53 N.W. 1064 Minn. 1892
(8) are disposed of by referring to Finlayson v. Crooks, 47 Minn. 74 , ( 49 N. W. Rep.
Glass v. Freeburg 52 N.W. 900 Minn. 1892
Glass v. Freeburg 52 N.W. 900 Minn. 1892
In Finlayson v. Crooks, 47 Minn. 74 , ( 49 N. W. Rep.
Miller v. Stoddard 52 N.W. 895 Minn. 1892
Miller v. Stoddard 52 N.W. 895 Minn. 1892
§ 1186,) it would obviate a very embarrassing question, which might have been raised in this ease, and which was somewhat discussed in Finlayson v. Crooks, 47 Minn. 74 , ( 49 N. W. Rep.