cl-8012219 Precedential Affirmed Processed

Flanigan v. Duncan

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed October 21, 1891 · 49 N.W. 981

Cited by

Gorco Construction Co. v. Stein 99 N.W.2d 69 Minn. 1959
Hempel v. Hempel 30 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1948
Hildebrandt v. Newell 272 N.W. 257 Minn. 1937
Jennrich v. Moeller 234 N.W. 638 Minn. 1931
Bokelmann v. Bokelmann 230 N.W. 478 Minn. 1930
Rotering v. Hibbard 210 N.W. 395 Minn. 1926
Glauber v. Wallace 116 N.W. 107 Minn. 1908
S. E. Olson Co. v. Youngquist 78 N.W. 870 Minn. 1899
S. E. Olson Co. v. Youngquist 75 N.W. 727 Minn. 1898

Opinion text

Gileillan, C. J. As to the fact of service of the summons, the affidavits were in direct conflict, presenting a fair and rather close question on the fact. Following the invariable practice of this court in such cases, we sustain the finding of the court below. There is nothing in the other points made requiring notice. Order affirmed.