Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Orth v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co., 50 N.W. 363.
-
Minn. 2021
Co., see Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc., d at 328 (“Mere speculation, without some concrete evidence, is no t enough to avoid summary judgment.”).
- Manteuffel v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co. 56 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1952
-
Manteuffel v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co.
56 N.W.2d 310
Minn. 1952
Co. 47 Minn. 384 , , and Hanrahan v. Safwuy Steel Scaffold Co. 233 Minn. 171 , 46 N. W. (2d) 243 .
- Lewerenz v. E. W. Wylie Co. 51 N.W.2d 834 Minn. 1952
-
Lewerenz v. E. W. Wylie Co.
51 N.W.2d 834
Minn. 1952
Co. 47 Minn. 384, 389 , .
- Bauer v. Miller Motor Co. 267 N.W. 206 Minn. 1936
-
Bauer v. Miller Motor Co.
267 N.W. 206
Minn. 1936
Co. 47 Minn. 384 , ; Alling v. N. W. Bell Tel.
- Schendel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 206 N.W. 436 Minn. 1925
-
Schendel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
206 N.W. 436
Minn. 1925
Co. 47 Minn. 384 , , it is said that “it is not enough that the evidence leaves the matter in equilibrio as to whether the injury was produced by a cause for which the defendant was responsible, or by one for which it was not responsible, and a fortiori no recovery can be had if it is more probable that it was produced by
- Hedin v. Northwestern Knitting Co. 149 N.W. 541 Minn. 1914
-
Hedin v. Northwestern Knitting Co.
149 N.W. 541
Minn. 1914
Co. 47 Minn. 384 , ; “In an action * * * for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant, it is not necessary to establish with absolute certainty the connection of cause and effect between the negligent act and the injury.
- McColl v. Cameron 148 N.W. 108 Minn. 1914
-
McColl v. Cameron
148 N.W. 108
Minn. 1914
Co. 47 Minn. 384 , ; Koslowski v. Thayer, 66 Minn. 150 , ; Moores v. Northern Pacific Ry.
- Mitton v. Cargill Elevator Co. 144 N.W. 434 Minn. 1913
-
Mitton v. Cargill Elevator Co.
144 N.W. 434
Minn. 1913
Co. 47 Minn. 384 , ; Lillstorm v. Northern Pacific R. Co. 53 Minn. 464 , , 20 L.R.A.
- Kohout v. Newman 104 N.W. 764 Minn. 1905
-
Kohout v. Newman
104 N.W. 764
Minn. 1905
Co., 47 Minn. 384 , ; Olson v. Great Northern Ry.
- Simonson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 92 N.W. 459 Minn. 1902
-
Simonson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad
92 N.W. 459
Minn. 1902
Co., 47 Minn. 384 , ; Briggs v. Minneapolis St.
- Swenson v. Erlandson 90 N.W. 534 Minn. 1902
-
Swenson v. Erlandson
90 N.W. 534
Minn. 1902
Co., 47 Minn. 384 , ; Baxter v. Great Northern Ry.
- Minneapolis Sash & Door Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co. 86 N.W. 451 Minn. 1901
- Minneapolis Sash & Door Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co. 86 N.W. 451 Minn. 1901
- Olson v. Great Northern Railway Co. 71 N.W. 5 Minn. 1897
- Olson v. Great Northern Railway Co. 71 N.W. 5 Minn. 1897
- Lillstrom v. Northern Pacific Railroad 55 N.W. 624 Minn. 1893
-
Lillstrom v. Northern Pacific Railroad
55 N.W. 624
Minn. 1893
Co., 47 Minn. 384 , ( 50 N. W. Rep.
- Briggs v. Minneapolis Street Ry. Co. 53 N.W. 1019 Minn. 1892
-
Briggs v. Minneapolis Street Ry. Co.
53 N.W. 1019
Minn. 1892
Co., 47 Minn. 384, ( 50 N. W. Rep.