Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Co., 50 N.W. 471.

36 citing documents.

MacIoch v. Wagner 134 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1965
MacIoch v. Wagner 134 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1965
State v. H. J. Minar Co. 81 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 1957
State v. H. J. Minar Co. 81 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 1957
Co. 47 Minn. 422 , ; 2 Williston, Sales (Rev. ed.) § 448.
B. A. Griffin Co. v. Northwestern Fish & Seafood Co. 33 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1948
B. A. Griffin Co. v. Northwestern Fish & Seafood Co. 33 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1948
Fishback v. G. W. Van Dusen & Co. 33 Minn. 111 , ; Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Co. 47 Minn. 422 , ; Day v. Gravel, 72 Minn. 159 , .” In Sargent v. Bryan, 160 Minn. 200, 203 , , the rule is again stated: “Section 19, Uniform Sales Act, provides that unless a different intention appears, the property in the goods passes to the buyer *504 when an unconditional contract is made
In Re Estate of Peterson 281 N.W. 877 Minn. 1938
Downey v. Peterson 281 N.W. 877 Minn. 1938
In Re Estate of Peterson 281 N.W. 877 Minn. 1938
Co. 47 Minn. 422 , 50 N.W.
Downey v. Peterson 281 N.W. 877 Minn. 1938
Co. 47 Minn. 422 , ; Becher-Barrett-Lockerby Co. v. Hilbert, 197 Minn. 541 , ; 2 Mason Minn. St.
Louis F. Dow Co. v. Bittner 244 N.W. 556 Minn. 1932
Louis F. Dow Co. v. Bittner 244 N.W. 556 Minn. 1932
Watson v. Goldstein 222 N.W. 509 Minn. 1928
Watson v. Goldstein 222 N.W. 509 Minn. 1928
Co. 47 Minn. 422 , ; E. L. Welch Co. v. Lahart Elev.
Sargent v. Bryan 199 N.W. 737 Minn. 1924
Sargent v. Bryan 199 N.W. 737 Minn. 1924
Lampert Lumber Co. v. Thanning 197 N.W. 269 Minn. 1924
Lampert Lumber Co. v. Thanning 197 N.W. 269 Minn. 1924
Co. 47 Minn. 422 , ; 35 Cyc.
Jock v. O'Malley 165 N.W. 233 Minn. 1917
Jock v. O'Malley 165 N.W. 233 Minn. 1917
Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Co. 47 Minn. 422, Fredette v. Thomas, 57 Minn. 190 , ; E. L. Welch Co. v. Lahart Ele.
Wilkes v. Holmes 150 N.W. 1098 Minn. 1915
Wilkes v. Holmes 150 N.W. 1098 Minn. 1915
Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Co. 47 Minn. 422 , .
E. L. Welch Co. v. Lahart Elevator Co. 142 N.W. 828 Minn. 1913
E. L. Welch Co. v. Lahart Elevator Co. 142 N.W. 828 Minn. 1913
Fishback v. G. W. Van Dusen & Co. 33 Minn. 111 , ; Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Co. 47 Minn. 422 , ; Day v. Gravel, 72 Minn. 159 , .
Ammon v. Illinois Central Railroad 139 N.W. 819 Minn. 1913
Ammon v. Illinois Central Railroad 139 N.W. 819 Minn. 1913
Rail *441 v. Little Falls Lumber Co., 47 Minn. 422 , .
Somers v. Sturre 118 N.W. 682 Minn. 1908
Somers v. Sturre 118 N.W. 682 Minn. 1908
The contention of the plaintiff is to the effect that this was an immaterial issue, and no evidence should have been received tending to ’prove it, for the reason that the contract for-the sale and purchase of the stock was an executed one; hence the case is ruled by Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Co., 47 Minn. 422 , .
State v. Meehan 100 N.W. 6 Minn. 1904
State v. Meehan 100 N.W. 6 Minn. 1904
The test applicable to contracts where payment of the purchase price and delivery are -deferred is stated in Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Co., 47 Minn. 422 , , as follows: “The rule is that when the chattels are clearly designated and appropriated to the contract, are ready for immediate delivery, and the terms of sale, including the price, are explicitly given, there is an executed contract, and the title to the property, as between the parties, passes to t
McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Balfany 81 N.W. 10 Minn. 1899
McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Balfany 81 N.W. 10 Minn. 1899
See also Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Co., 47 Minn. 422 , .
Day v. Gravel 75 N.W. 1 Minn. 1898
Day v. Gravel 75 N.W. 1 Minn. 1898
We claim that it did, and claim that the case of Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Oo., 47 Minn. 422 , is in point, and that there is no difference in principle between the two cases.” Therefore this is the only question with reference to this counterclaim which we shall consider.
Restad v. Engemoen 67 N.W. 1146 Minn. 1896
Restad v. Engemoen 67 N.W. 1146 Minn. 1896
But, if anything remains to be done on the part of the seller, as between him and the buyer, such as weighing, measuring, or counting out of a common parcel, before the goods purchased are to be delivered, until that is ¿one the right of property has not attached in the buyer.” See, also, Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Co., 47 Minn. 422 , .