Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hospes v. Northwestern Manuf'g & Car Co., 50 N.W. 1117.

51 citing documents.

St. James Capital Corp. v. Pallet Recycling Associates of North America, Inc. 589 N.W.2d 511 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
St. James Capital Corp. v. Pallet Recycling Associates of North America, Inc. 589 N.W.2d 511 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
& Car Co., 48 Minn. 174, 192 , 50 N.W.
Tracy v. PERKINS-TRACY PRINTING COMPANY 153 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1967
Tracy v. PERKINS-TRACY PRINTING COMPANY 153 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1967
& Car Co. 48 Minn. 174 , , 15 L. R. A. 470) is at least doubtful.
Farmers Co-Operative Assn. of Bertha v. Kotz 23 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1946
Farmers Co-Operative Assn. of Bertha v. Kotz 23 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1946
& Car Co. 48 Minn. 174, 192 , , 15 L. R. A. 470, 31 A. S. R. 637, the court in the words of Mr. Justice Mitchell said: “* * * Corporate property is not held in trust, in any proper sense of the term.
City of Canby v. Bank of Canby 257 N.W. 520 Minn. 1934
Julian v. Northwestern Trust Co. 255 N.W. 622 Minn. 1934
Julian v. Northwestern Trust Co. 255 N.W. 622 Minn. 1934
& Car Co. 48 Minn. 174, 192 , , 15 L. R. A. 470, 31 A. S. R. 637; Rose v. Hatch, 125 N. Y. 427 , 26 N. E. 467 ; Woodward v. James, 115 N. Y. 346 , 22 N. E. 150 .
Bacich v. Northland Transportation Co. 242 N.W. 379 Minn. 1932
Bacich v. Northland Transportation Co. 242 N.W. 379 Minn. 1932
& Car Co. 48 Minn. 174 , , 15 L. R. A. 470, 31 A. S. R. 637; Shaw v. Staight, 107 Minn. 152 , , 20 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Ewing v. Gmeinder 212 N.W. 446 Minn. 1927
Ewing v. Gmeinder 212 N.W. 446 Minn. 1927
& Car Co. 48 Minn. 174, 175 , , 15 L. R. A. 470, 31 Am.
Woodward v. Sonnesyn 203 N.W. 221 Minn. 1925
Woodward v. Sonnesyn 203 N.W. 221 Minn. 1925
C. Co. 48 Minn. 174 , 50 N.W.
Dispatch Printing Co. v. Security Bond & Investment Co. 191 N.W. 601 Minn. 1923
Dispatch Printing Co. v. Security Bond & Investment Co. 191 N.W. 601 Minn. 1923
The facts presented by the petition herein are quite similar to those in Hospes v. Northwestern M. & C. Co. 48 Minn. 174 , , 15 L. R. A. 470, 31 Am.
Lebens v. Nelson 181 N.W. 350 Minn. 1921
Lebens v. Nelson 181 N.W. 350 Minn. 1921
510; Minnesota T. M. Co. v. Langdon, 44 Minn. 37 , ; Hospes v. N. W. M. & C. Co. 48 Minn. 174 , , 15 L.R.A.
State Bank of Commerce v. Kenney Band Instrument Co. 173 N.W. 560 Minn. 1919
State Bank of Commerce v. Kenney Band Instrument Co. 173 N.W. 560 Minn. 1919
& Car Co. 48 Minn. 174 , , 15 L.R.A.
Bartlett v. Stephens 163 N.W. 288 Minn. 1917
Bartlett v. Stephens 163 N.W. 288 Minn. 1917
& Car Co. 48 Minn. 174, 198 , , 15 L. B. A. 470, 31 *216 Am.
Mackall v. Pocock 161 N.W. 228 Minn. 1917
Mackall v. Pocock 161 N.W. 228 Minn. 1917
& Car Co. 48 Minn. 174 , , 15 L.R.A.
Preiss v. Zins 142 N.W. 822 Minn. 1913
Preiss v. Zins 142 N.W. 822 Minn. 1913
& Car Co. 48 Minn. 174 , , 15 L.R.A.
Randall Printing Co. v. Sanitas Mineral Water Co. 139 N.W. 606 Minn. 1913
Randall Printing Co. v. Sanitas Mineral Water Co. 139 N.W. 606 Minn. 1913
& Car Co. 48 Minn. 174 , , 15 L.R.A.
Downer v. Union Land Co. 129 N.W. 777 Minn. 1911
Downer v. Union Land Co. 129 N.W. 777 Minn. 1911
510; Hospes v. Northwestern M. & C. Co., 48 Minn. 174 , , 15 L.R.A.
Dwinnell v. Minneapolis Fire & Marine Mutual Insurance 106 N.W. 312 Minn. 1906
Dwinnell v. Minneapolis Fire & Marine Mutual Insurance 106 N.W. 312 Minn. 1906
& Car Co., 48 Minn. 174 , , 15 L. R. A. 470, 31 Am.
Watkins v. Bigelow 100 N.W. 1104 Minn. 1904
Watkins v. Bigelow 100 N.W. 1104 Minn. 1904
& Car Co., 48 Minn. 174, 192 , : “A trust implies two estates or interests, one equitable and one legal; one person as trustee holding the legal title, while another as the cestui qui trust has the beneficial interest.” It follows that a gift which vests both the legal title and the beneficial ownership of the subject of the gi
Sims v. Morrison 100 N.W. 88 Minn. 1904
Sims v. Morrison 100 N.W. 88 Minn. 1904
& Car Co., 48 Minn. 192 , , implies two estates or interests — one equitable and one legal; one person, as trustee, holding the legal title, while another, as cestui que trust, has the beneficial or equitable interest.- This is an accurate statement of the general rule running through all the adjudged cases, and none are cited holding that rea
Richardson v. Merritt 77 N.W. 234 Minn. 1898
Richardson v. Merritt 77 N.W. 234 Minn. 1898
& C. Co., 48 Minn. 174 ; Sawyer v. Hoag, 17.
Mendenhall v. Duluth Dry Goods Co. 75 N.W. 232 Minn. 1898
Mendenhall v. Duluth Dry Goods Co. 75 N.W. 232 Minn. 1898
& C. Co., 48 Minn. 174 , , is directly in their favor upon the point that an allegation of the actual money consideration for the transfer of the notes was absolutely required.
Palmer v. Bank of Zumbrota 75 N.W. 380 Minn. 1898
Palmer v. Bank of Zumbrota 75 N.W. 380 Minn. 1898
& C. Co., 48 Minn. 174, *281 199 , , and was also the holding in Mississippi & M. R. Co. v. Cromwell, 91 U. S. 643 .
Wallace v. Carpenter Electric Heating Manufacturing Co. 73 N.W. 189 Minn. 1897
Wallace v. Carpenter Electric Heating Manufacturing Co. 73 N.W. 189 Minn. 1897
Hospes v. Northwestern, 48 Minn. 174 , ; Hastings v Iron Range, 65 Minn. 28 , .
Northwestern Railroader v. Prior 70 N.W. 869 Minn. 1897
Northwestern Railroader v. Prior 70 N.W. 869 Minn. 1897
Hospes v. Northwestern, 48 Minn. 174 , ; Hastings v. Iron Range, 65 Minn. 28 , and, for the purposes of this action, it may be conceded that, without the aid of the provisions of said chapter 76, the two causes of action could not properly be united in one action.
Hastings Malting Co. v. Iron Range Brewing Co. 67 N.W. 652 Minn. 1896
Hastings Malting Co. v. Iron Range Brewing Co. 67 N.W. 652 Minn. 1896
& Car Co., 48 Minn. 174 , , wherein it was held that the right of creditors to compel holders-of stock not paid for to pay for it, contrary to their agreement with the corporation, rested neither on implied contract nor upon the “trust fund” doctrine, but upon the ground of fraud.
Smith v. Prior 59 N.W. 1016 Minn. 1894