Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mackellar v. Pillsbury, 51 N.W. 222.

28 citing documents.

Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Respondent banks correctly note that the supreme court has long held that a “mere preference by a debtor of one creditor to another is not fraudulent or void at common law, though the preference may have the incidental effect of hindering the latter from the collection of his debt.” 8 Mackellar v. Pillsbury, 48 Minn. 396, 398 , 51 N.W.
Matchan v. Phoenix Land Investment Co. 198 N.W. 417 Minn. 1924
Matchan v. Phoenix Land Investment Co. 198 N.W. 417 Minn. 1924
In support of that argument appellant invokes the rule of such cases as Bannon v. Bowler, 34 Minn. 416 , ; MacKellar v. Pillsbury, 48 Minn. 396 , ; and Dyson v. St.
Engenmoen v. Lutroe 190 N.W. 894 Minn. 1922
Engenmoen v. Lutroe 190 N.W. 894 Minn. 1922
Mackellar v. Pillsbury, 48 Minn. 396 , ; Dyson v. St.
National Fire Insurance v. Itasca Lumber Co. 181 N.W. 337 Minn. 1921
National Fire Insurance v. Itasca Lumber Co. 181 N.W. 337 Minn. 1921
Nash v. Brewster, 39 Minn. 530 , , 2 L. R. A. 409; Mackellar v. Pillsbury, 48 Minn. 396 , .
Boyum v. Jordan 178 N.W. 158 Minn. 1920
Boyum v. Jordan 178 N.W. 158 Minn. 1920
Mackellar v. Pillsbury, 48 Minn. 396 , In re Bird, 39 Minn. 520 , ; In re Fuller, 42 Minn. 22 , ; National Surety Co. v. Hurley, 130 Minn. 392 , , L.R.A.
Petersdorf v. Malz 162 N.W. 474 Minn. 1917
Petersdorf v. Malz 162 N.W. 474 Minn. 1917
Barry v. O’Connor, 33 Minn. 29 , ; Bannon v. Bowler, 34 Minn. 416 , ; Mackellar v. Pillsbury, 48 Minn. 396 , .
Sheehy v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 147 N.W. 964 Minn. 1914
Sheehy v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 147 N.W. 964 Minn. 1914
Co. 56 Minn. 28 , ; Hooper v. Great Northern Ry.
Mitchell v. Green 145 N.W. 404 Minn. 1914
Mitchell v. Green 145 N.W. 404 Minn. 1914
Burrill, Assignments, 24; Lesher v. Getman, 28 Minn. 93 , ; Makellar v. Pillsbury, 48 Minn. 396 , ; Lucy v. Freeman, 93 Minn. 274 , .
Crookston State Bank v. Lee 144 N.W. 433 Minn. 1913
Crookston State Bank v. Lee 144 N.W. 433 Minn. 1913
Smith v. Deidrick, 30 Minn. 60 , ; Berry v. O’Connor, 33 Minn. 29 , ; Mackellar v. Pillsbury, 48 Minn. 396 , ; Dyson v. St.
Davis v. Cobb 83 N.W. 505 Minn. 1900
Davis v. Cobb 83 N.W. 505 Minn. 1900
Mackellar v. Pillsbury, 48 Minn. 396 , .
Dyson v. St. Paul National Bank 77 N.W. 236 Minn. 1898
Dyson v. St. Paul National Bank 77 N.W. 236 Minn. 1898
Berry v. O’Connor, 33 Minn. 29 , ; Bannon v. Bowler, 34 Minn. 416 , ; Mackellar v. Pillsbury, 48 Minn. 396 , .
Jennison v. Thompson 71 N.W. 380 Minn. 1897
Jennison v. Thompson 71 N.W. 380 Minn. 1897
Respondent relies on Nash v. Brewster, 39 Minn. 530 , , and Mackellar v. Pillsbury, 48 Minn. 396 , .
Walsh v. St. Paul School Furniture Co. 62 N.W. 383 Minn. 1895
Walsh v. St. Paul School Furniture Co. 62 N.W. 383 Minn. 1895
Mackellar v. Pillsbury, 48 Minn. 396 , .
Cottrell v. Citizens' Savings Bank 54 N.W. 1111 Minn. 1893
Cottrell v. Citizens' Savings Bank 54 N.W. 1111 Minn. 1893
The deed of assignment involved is that considered in Mackellar v. Pillsbury, 48 Minn. 396 , ( 51 N. W. Rep.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by