Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Atwater v. Russell, 51 N.W. 629.

28 citing documents.

  • Consolidated School District No. 102 v. Walter 66 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1954
  • Consolidated School District No. 102 v. Walter 66 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1954
    E.g., Watkins v. Bigelow, 93 Minn. 210 , ; Lane v. Eaton, 69 Minn. 141 , , 38 L. R. A. 669; Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 57 , , .
  • Atwood v. Holmes 28 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1947
  • Atwood v. Holmes 28 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1947
    That they are to sell as soon as in their judgment the same can be sold for a reasonable price does not limit the power to alienate and pass the title, and puts no restriction on their exercise of it beyond what the law would impose, though the clause were omitted.” In the companion case, Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 57 , , a deed contained certain provisions which it was claimed suspended the power of alienation.
  • Peterson v. Peterson 23 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1946
  • Peterson v. Peterson 23 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1946
  • Stacey v. Taylor 264 N.W. 809 Minn. 1936
  • Stacey v. Taylor 264 N.W. 809 Minn. 1936
    Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 57, 79 , , ; Congdon v. Congdon, 160 Minn. 343 , ; Matt- *210 son v. United States E. H. Co. 171 Minn. 237 , .
  • Lundquist v. First Evangelical Lutheran Church 259 N.W. 9 Minn. 1935
  • In Re Estate of Lundquist 259 N.W. 9 Minn. 1935
  • In Re Estate of Lundquist 259 N.W. 9 Minn. 1935
    Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 57 , 51 N.W.
  • Lundquist v. First Evangelical Lutheran Church 259 N.W. 9 Minn. 1935
    Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 57 , , ; Lane v. Eaton, 69 Minn. 141 , , 38 L. R. A. 669, 65 A. S. R. 559; Watkins v. Bigelow, 93 Minn. 210 , ; Young-Men’s Christian Assn. v. Horn, 120 Minn. 404 , ; Little v. Universalist Convention, 143 Minn. 298 , : Although there is no
  • Mattson v. United States Ensilage Harvester Co. 213 N.W. 893 Minn. 1927
  • Mattson v. United States Ensilage Harvester Co. 213 N.W. 893 Minn. 1927
    Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 57 , , .
  • Congdon v. Congdon 200 N.W. 76 Minn. 1924
  • Congdon v. Congdon 200 N.W. 76 Minn. 1924
    26 R. C. L. 1372, § 233; Watkins v. Bigelow, 93 Minn. 210 , ; Mayall v. Mayall, 63 Minn. 511 , ; Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 22 and 57, , , ; 2 Perry, Trusts & Trustees (6th ed.) § 476A, note (a).
  • Robertson v. Robertson 164 N.W. 980 Minn. 1917
  • Robertson v. Robertson 164 N.W. 980 Minn. 1917
    See G. S. 1913, § 7973, et seq.; Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 57 , , .
  • Shraiberg v. Hanson 163 N.W. 1032 Minn. 1917
  • Shraiberg v. Hanson 163 N.W. 1032 Minn. 1917
    Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 57 , , .
  • Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Horn 139 N.W. 805 Minn. 1913
  • Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Horn 139 N.W. 805 Minn. 1913
    Thus, in Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 57, 82 , , , lands were conveyed with direction that the proceeds be used by a certain incorporated hospital Tor the support of charity patients in the same.’ This kind of charity work was a part of the purposes for which the hospital was incorporated, and the gift was held to be absolute, and no
  • Watkins v. Bigelow 100 N.W. 1104 Minn. 1904
  • Watkins v. Bigelow 100 N.W. 1104 Minn. 1904
    German Land Assn. v. Scholler, 10 Minn. 260 (331); Little v. Willford, 31 Minn. 173 , ; Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 57 , , ; Lane v. Eaton, 69 Minn. 141 , ; Shanahan v. Kelly, 88 Minn. 202 , .
  • Shanahan v. Kelly 92 N.W. 948 Minn. 1903
  • Shanahan v. Kelly 92 N.W. 948 Minn. 1903
    German Land Assn. v. Scholler, 10 Minn. 260 (331); Little v. Willford, 31 Minn. 173 , ; Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 57 , , ; Lane v. Eaton, 69 Minn. 141 , .
  • Lane v. Eaton 71 N.W. 1031 Minn. 1897
  • Lane v. Eaton 71 N.W. 1031 Minn. 1897
    Thus, in Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn, 57, 82, , and , lands were conveyed with directions that the proceeds be used by a certain incorporated hospital “for the support of charity patients in the same.” This kind of charity work was a part of the purposes for which the hospital was incorporated, and the gift was held to be absolute, and not in trust.