Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co., 51 N.W. 1103.

43 citing documents.

Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp. 311 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1981
Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp. 311 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1981
Co. v. Proksch, 309 Minn. 106, 113 , McCormack v. Hankscraft Co., 278 Minn. 322, 339 , -01 (1967); Beck v. Spindler, 256 Minn. 543, 562 , Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co., 49 Minn. 331, 340 , 51 N.W.
Milbank Mutual Insurance v. Proksch 244 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 1976
Milbank Mutual Insurance v. Proksch 244 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 1976
Thus, in Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co. 49 Minn. 331 , , 15 L. R. A. 818, we substantially abolished privity in negligence actions by a con *115 sumer against the manufacturer.
McCormack v. Hankscraft Company 154 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1967
McCormack v. Hankscraft Company 154 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1967
Thus, in Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co. 49 Minn. 331 , , 15 L. R. A. 818, we substantially abolished privity in negligence actions by a consumer against the manufacturer.
Beck v. Spindler 99 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1959
Beck v. Spindler 99 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1959
Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co. *560 49 Minn. 331 , , 15 L. R. A. 818.
Campbell v. Siever 91 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1958
Campbell v. Siever 91 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1958
Such a rule was previously indicated in an earlier decision of this court in Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co. 49 Minn. 331 , , 15 L. R. A. 818, 32 A. S. R. 559, where the plaintiff was injured as a result of a concealed defect in a stepladder ordered by his employer from a dealer.
Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co. 79 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1956
Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co. 79 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1956
2 Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co. 49 Minn. 331 , , 15 L. R. A. 818; Heise v. J. R. Clark Co. 245 Minn. 179 , 71 N. W. (2d) 818 ; Hartmon v. National Heater Co. 240 Minn. 264 , 60 N. W. (2d) 804 ; see, also, Restatement, Torts, §§ 388 to 390, 394, 395; MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. 217 N. Y. 382 , 111 N. E. 1050 , L. R. A. 1916F, 696; DiVello v. Gardn
Heise v. the JR Clark Co. 71 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 1955
Heise v. the JR Clark Co. 71 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 1955
In that respect we believe that this case comes within the rule laid down in Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co. 49 Minn. 331 , , 15 L. R. A. 818.
Person v. Okes 29 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1947
Person v. Okes 29 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1947
2 See, Anderson v. Fred Johnson Co. 116 Minn. 56 , ; Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co. 49 Minn. 331 , , 15 L. R. A. 818, 32 A. S. R. 559.
Wright v. Holland Furnace Co. Inc. 243 N.W. 387 Minn. 1932
Wright v. Holland Furnace Co. Inc. 243 N.W. 387 Minn. 1932
Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co. 49 Minn. 331 , , 15 L. R. A. 818, 32 A. S. R. 559; Holmvik v. Parsons B. C. & *268 S. F. Co. 98 Minn. 424 , ; Wolden v. Deering, 105 Minn. 259 , ; O’Brien v. American Bridge Co. 110 Minn. 364 , , 32 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Rehg v. Vermilion Boat & Outing Co. 231 N.W. 611 Minn. 1930
Rehg v. Vermilion Boat & Outing Co. 231 N.W. 611 Minn. 1930
Sale of instrumentalities by manufacturers in which defects are concealed by paint, Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co. 49 Minn. 331 , , 15 L. R. A. 818, 32 A. S. R. 559; Holmvik v. Parsons B. C. & S. F. Co. 98 Minn. 424 , ; Krahn.
In Re Estate of Mikkelson 228 N.W. 174 Minn. 1929
Moll v. Bester 225 N.W. 393 Minn. 1929
Moll v. Bester 225 N.W. 393 Minn. 1929
In the familiar ladder case, Schubert *423 v. J. R. Clark Co. 49 Minn. 331, 335 , , 15 L. R. A. 818, 32 A. S. R. 559, the court said in relation to the plaintiff “He did not stand in any relation of privity with the contracting parties, — the retail merchant, who purchased, and the defendant, who sold, the ladder.
Goar v. Village of Stephen 196 N.W. 171 Minn. 1923
Goar v. Village of Stephen 196 N.W. 171 Minn. 1923
The ladder case is Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co. 49 Minn. 331 , , 15 L. R. A. 818, 32 Am.
Santala v. Hill 173 N.W. 651 Minn. 1919
Co. 49 Minn. 353 , ; Graham v. Conrad, 66 Minn. 471 , ; Spitzhak v. Regenik, 122 Minn. 352 , .
Krahn v. J. L. Owens Co. 145 N.W. 626 Minn. 1914
Krahn v. J. L. Owens Co. 145 N.W. 626 Minn. 1914
Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co. 49 Minn. 331 , , 15 L.R.A.
Spitzhak v. Regenik 142 N.W. 709 Minn. 1913
Co. 49 Minn. 353 , , Treat v. United Order of Foresters, 109 Minn. 110 , .
O'Brien v. American Bridge Co. 125 N.W. 1012 Minn. 1910
O'Brien v. American Bridge Co. 125 N.W. 1012 Minn. 1910
The leading case on the subject in this state is Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co., 49 Minn. 331 , , 15 L.R.A.
Holmes v. Igo 124 N.W. 974 Minn. 1910
Treat v. Court Minnesota, No. 17 123 N.W. 62 Minn. 1909
Evans v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 122 N.W. 876 Minn. 1909
Evans v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 122 N.W. 876 Minn. 1909
Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co., 49 Minn. 331 , , 15 L. R. A. 818, 32 Am.
Wolden v. Deering 117 N.W. 493 Minn. 1908
Wolden v. Deering 117 N.W. 493 Minn. 1908
Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co., 49 Minn. 331 , , 15 L. R. A. 818, 32 Am.
Crandall v. Boutell 103 N.W. 890 Minn. 1905
Crandall v. Boutell 103 N.W. 890 Minn. 1905
Smith v. Munch, 65 Minn. 256 , ; Mulvehill v. Bates, 31 Minn. 364 , ; Walters v. Pioneer Fuel Co., 52 Minn. 474 , ; Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co., 49 Minn. 331 , ; Philadelphia & R. R. Co. v. Derby, 14 How.
Smith v. Kistler 86 N.W. 876 Minn. 1901
Co., 49 Minn. 353 , ; Looney v. Drometer, 69 Minn. 505 , .
Grimes v. Fall 83 N.W. 835 Minn. 1900
Graham v. Conrad 69 N.W. 334 Minn. 1896
P. R. Co., 49 Minn. 353 , .
Stolt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. 51 N.W. 1103 Minn. 1892