Cited by

See, Mattson v. United States Ensilage Harvester Co. 171 Minn. 237 , ; Mowry v. Thompson, 189 Minn. 479 , ; In re Tower’s Estate, 49 Minn. 371 , .

52 ; In re Tower's Estate, 49 Minn. 371 , 52 N.W.

satisfied.” See, also, In re Tower’s Estate, 49 Minn. 371 , ; Y. M. C. A. v. Horn, 120 Minn. 404 , ; Congdon v. Congdon, 160 Minn. 343, 361 , ; Erickson v. Erickson, 197 Minn. 71, 80 , , , 427.

This court in Baker v. Terrell, 8 Minn. 165 (195) (1862) said: “There can be but little doubt that the chapter of our statutes concerning uses and trusts relates to real property only.” Again in Re Tower’s Estate, 49 Minn. 371 , this court affirmed the proposition that as to personal property the common law rule as to trusts still prevailed in Minnesota; and in that connection said [page 376]: “And in this state the statutory provisions in respect to trusts in real estate must, in proper cases,

In re Tower’s Estate, 49 Minn. 371 -376, .

1912D, 882; Simpson v. Cook, 24 Minn. 180 ; In re Tower’s Estate, 49 Minn. 371 , .

In the case of In re Tower’s Estate, 49 Minn. 371 , , which also involved the will of a nonresident, the right of the widow as heir under section 3648 seems to have-been assumed.

summed up as a gift of land to a trustee, to be by him sold and converted into personalty “at the earliest practical moment, when such conversion can be made without a sacrifice of the value of said real estate,” and the proceeds thereof are to be “held and deemed at all times to be the principal of said second trust fund.” “It is well settled,” said the court in the case of In re Tower’s Estate, 49 Minn. 371 , at page 379, , 29, “that, where a sale is directed in the instrument creating the tru

Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co., 49 Minn. 370 , .

Co., 49 Minn. 370 , ; Halverson v. Chicago, M. & St.

Co., 49 Minn. 370 , ; Mechem, Ag.

Anthony Co., 19 Minn. 370 , .