Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite People's Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 52 N.W. 219.

48 citing documents.

In Re State & Regents Building Asbestos Cases 435 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1989
In Re State & Regents Building Asbestos Cases 435 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1989
(quoting with approval from People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1, 2 , 52 N.W.
Terry, Inc. v. Sales Service Machine Tool Co. 414 N.W.2d 568 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Terry, Inc. v. Sales Service Machine Tool Co. 414 N.W.2d 568 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , 52 N.W.
Marriage of Moberg v. Moberg 347 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1984
Marriage of Moberg v. Moberg 347 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1984
In the early case of People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , 52 N.W.
Grorud v. Thomasson 177 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1970
Grorud v. Thomasson 177 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1970
605.09(d); Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, Rule 103.03(d); People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , ; Ayer v. Chicago, M. St.
Ginsberg v. Williams 135 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1965
Ginsberg v. Williams 135 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1965
In the leading and early case of People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1, 2 , , Mr. Justice Mitchell declared: “That an order vacating a judgment is appealable as ‘an order involving the merits of the action’ is no longer an open question in this court.
Blomberg v. Tschida 130 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1964
Blomberg v. Tschida 130 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1964
1 Morehart v. Furley, 152 Minn. 388 , ; People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , .
Bredemann v. Bredemann 91 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 1958
Bredemann v. Bredemann 91 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 1958
Paul & Duluth R. Co. 27 Minn. 109 , ; People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , ; Philadelphia Storage Battery Co. v. Hawley, 154 Minn. 538 , ; Peterson v. W. Davis & Sons, 216 Minn. 60 , 11 N. W. (2d) 800 .
Peterson v. W. Davis & Sons 11 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1943
Peterson v. W. Davis & Sons 11 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1943
People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , ; Grady v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co. 145 Minn. 74 , .
State Ex Rel. Beede v. Funck 299 N.W. 684 Minn. 1941
State Ex Rel. Beede v. Funck 299 N.W. 684 Minn. 1941
1927, § 9498(3); Rogers v. Greenwood, 14 Minn. 256 (333); People's Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , ; Rishmiller v. Denver & R. G. R. Co. 134 Minn. 261 , ; Picciano v. D. M. & N. Ry.
High v. Supreme Lodge 290 N.W. 425 Minn. 1940
High v. Supreme Lodge 290 N.W. 425 Minn. 1940
Grady v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co. 145 Minn. 74 , ; People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , ; McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , .
Weinstein v. Schwartz 283 N.W. 127 Minn. 1938
See Anderson v. Liljengren, 50 Minn. 3 , , approved in Gorman v. Hand Brg.
O'Leary v. Wangensteen 221 N.W. 430 Minn. 1928
Co. 21 Minn. 215 ; Klason v. Rieger, 22 Minn. 59 ; Hawkins v. Sauby, 48 Minn. 69 , ; Anderson v. Liljengren, 50 Minn. 3 , ; Lang v. Ferrant, 55 Minn. 415 , ; Second Nat.
Laplante v. Knutson 219 N.W. 184 Minn. 1928
Laplante v. Knutson 219 N.W. 184 Minn. 1928
See People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , .
Kelly v. Anderson 194 N.W. 102 Minn. 1923
Kelly v. Anderson 194 N.W. 102 Minn. 1923
Section 8001, G. S. 1913; Piper v. Johnston, 12 Minn. 27 (60); People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , ; Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co. 89 Minn. 470 , ; Commissioners of Aitkin County v. Morrison, 25 Minn. 295 ; Truesdale v. Farmers L. & T. Co. 67 Minn. 454 , , 64 Am.
Nelson v. Bullard 194 N.W. 308 Minn. 1923
Hawkins v. Sauby, 48 Minn. 69 , ; Anderson v. Liljengren, 50 Minn. 3 , .
Grady v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co. 176 N.W. 153 Minn. 1920
Grady v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co. 176 N.W. 153 Minn. 1920
In application of these principles it has been held that an affidavit of merits may be dispensed with, where there is an answer, verified upon knowledge, People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , Forin v. City of Duluth, 66 Minn. 54 , , or where defensive facts are set forth in an affidavit of one having knowledge, McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , , or where the conduct of the other party shows weakness in his case, as where he set up a counterclaim in excess of the
Olsson v. Midland Insurance 165 N.W. 474 Minn. 1917
Hawkins v. Sauby, 48 Minn. 69 , ; Anderson v. Liljengren, 50 Minn. 3 , .
Baxter v. Brandenburg 163 N.W. 516 Minn. 1917
Hawkins v. Sauby, 48 Minn. 69 , ; Anderson v. Liljengren, 50 Minn. 3 , .
Selover v. Streckfus Steamboat Line 162 N.W. 518 Minn. 1917
Selover v. Streckfus Steamboat Line 162 N.W. 518 Minn. 1917
People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , .
Northwest Thresher Co. v. Herding 148 N.W. 57 Minn. 1914
Northwest Thresher Co. v. Herding 148 N.W. 57 Minn. 1914
“Courts are naturally and very properly inclined to relieve a party from a default, if he furnishes any reasonble excuse for his neglect, and makes any fair showing of merits.” People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , ; Milwaukee Harvester Co. v. Schroeder, 72 Minn. 393 , ; Hull v. Chapel, 77 Minn. 159 , , 77 Am.
Dr. Shoop Family Medicine Co. v. Oppliger 144 N.W. 743 Minn. 1914
Dr. Shoop Family Medicine Co. v. Oppliger 144 N.W. 743 Minn. 1914
The absence of an affidavit of merits resulted in a reversal of an order opening the default in People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , .
McClure v. Clarke 101 N.W. 951 Minn. 1904
McClure v. Clarke 101 N.W. 951 Minn. 1904
The following cases illustrate in many phases the rule adopted: Altmann v. Gabriel, 28 Minn. 132 , ; People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , ; Osman v. Wisted, 78 Minn. 295 , ; McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , ; Crane & Ordway Co. v. Sauntry, 90 Minn. 301 , ; White v. Gurney, 92 Minn. 271 , .
Crane & Ordway Co. v. Sauntry 96 N.W. 794 Minn. 1903
Crane & Ordway Co. v. Sauntry 96 N.W. 794 Minn. 1903
People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , .
Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co. 95 N.W. 320 Minn. 1903
Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co. 95 N.W. 320 Minn. 1903
Piper v. Johnston, 12 Minn. 27 (60); People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , .
Grover v. Bach 84 N.W. 909 Minn. 1901
Hawkins v. Sauby, 48 Minn. 69 , ; Anderson v. Liljengren, 50 Minn. 3 , .
Robbins v. Legg 83 N.W. 379 Minn. 1900
Hawkins v. Sauby, 48 Minn. 69 , ; Anderson v. Liljengren, 50 Minn. 3 , ; Lang v. Ferrant, 55 Minn. 415 , ; Basting v. Northern Trust Co., 65 Minn. 495 , .
Forin v. City of Duluth 68 N.W. 515 Minn. 1896
People’s Ice Co. v. Sehlenker, 50 Minn, i, .
Olivier v. Cunningham 53 N.W. 462 Minn. 1892
Olivier v. Cunningham 53 N.W. 462 Minn. 1892
508 ;) People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , ( 52 N. W. Rep.