Cited by

Co. 50 Minn. 341 , ; Gasser v. Sun Fire Office, 42 Minn. 315 , ; Williams v. Branning Mfg.

Co. 50 Minn. 341 , ; Hamberg v. St.

Co. 50 Minn. 341 , ; Goldman v. Weisman, 123 Minn. 370 , ; Abramovitz v. National Council K. & L. of S. 134 Minn. 302 , .

Co. 50 Minn. 341 , ; Janney, Semple & Co. v. Goehringer, 52 Minn. 428 , , approving the rule stated in R. O. Wood & Co. v. Helme, 14 R. I. 325; Schoenich v. American Ins.

Co. 50 Minn. 341 , ; Brush v. Fisher, 70 Mich.

Co. 50 Minn. 341 , ; Janney, Semple & Co. v. Goehringer, 52 Minn. 428 , ; Levine v. Lancashire Ins.

Co. 50 Minn. 341, 347 , .

Co., 50 Minn. 341 , , it was, in substance, said that the provision of the policy referred to was a condition precedent to the right of action thereon.

Co., 50 Minn. 341 , ; Janney, Semple & Co. v. Goehringer, 52 Minn. 428 , ; Levine v. Lancashire Ins.

Gasser v. Sun, 42 Minn. 315 , ; *339 Powers v. Imperial, 48 Minn. 388 , ; Mosness v. German, 50 Minn. 341 , .

Co., 50 Minn. 341 , , undoubtedly the provision in this policy for the determination of the amount of the *149 loss by arbitration was a condition precedent to a right of action on the policy, and not a mere collateral stipulation to enter into a submission.

Co., 50 Minn. 341 , ( ;) Voak v. National Investment Co., 51 Minn. 450 , ( ); and it is quite difficult on principle to see why the rules of pleading in actions on insurance contracts should be different from those applied in actions on other contracts.

Co., 50 Minn. 341 , ( 52 N. W. Rep.

Co., 50 Minn. 341 , ( 52 N. W. Rep.