Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Village of Wayzata v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 52 N.W. 913.

31 citing documents.

Robert Sanden, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Heuer v. County of Aitkin 645 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Heuer v. County of Aitkin 645 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., 50 Minn. 438, 443-44 , 52 N.W.
McLafferty v. St. Aubin 500 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
McLafferty v. St. Aubin 500 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Co., 50 Minn. 438 , 52 N.W.
Farnes v. Freeman Lane 161 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1968
Farnes v. Freeman Lane 161 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1968
Co. 50 Minn. 438 , ; In re Petition of Schaller, 193 Minn. 604 , ; Troska v. Brecht, 140 Minn. 233 , ; Bryant v. Gustafson, 230 Minn. 1 , 40 N. W. (2d) 427 .
Flynn v. Beisel 102 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1960
Flynn v. Beisel 102 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1960
Co. 50 Minn. 438, 442 , , said: “* * * Where the grant or dedication to the public is for the purpose of passage, and goes to the water, the conclusion — there being no indication of a contrary intention — is inevitable that the grant or dedication was intended to enable the public to get to the water for the better
State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of Mound 48 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1951
State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of Mound 48 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1951
Bryant v. Gustafson 40 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1950
Bryant v. Gustafson 40 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1950
Co. 50 Minn. *9 438, 442, , with respect to a public street bordering on Lake Minnetonka:.
In Re Petition of Schaller 259 N.W. 529 Minn. 1935
In Re Petition of Schaller 259 N.W. 529 Minn. 1935
Co. 59 Minn. 438 , 442 , , 914 , had for consideration a similar situation in respect of a street bordering upon the shores of Lake Minnetonka.
Troska v. Brecht 167 N.W. 1042 Minn. 1918
Troska v. Brecht 167 N.W. 1042 Minn. 1918
Co. 50 Minn. 438 , , the court say: “Where the grant or dedication to the public is for the purpose of passage, and goes to the water, the conclusion— there being no indication of a contrary intention — is inevitable that the grant or dedication was intended to enable the public to "get to the water for the better enjoyme
State v. Korrer 148 N.W. 617 Minn. 1914
State v. Korrer 148 N.W. 617 Minn. 1914
Co. 50 Minn. 438 , ; In re Minnetonka Lake Improvement, 56 Minn. 513 , , 45 Am.
Haramon v. Krause 101 N.W. 791 Minn. 1904
Haramon v. Krause 101 N.W. 791 Minn. 1904
Co., 50 Minn. 438 , ; Village of Glencoe v. Wadsworth, 48 Minn. 402 , .
City of Hastings v. Gillitt 88 N.W. 987 Minn. 1902
City of Hastings v. Gillitt 88 N.W. 987 Minn. 1902
Co., 50 Minn. 438 , ; City of St.
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Abner Townsend 86 N.W. 1007 Minn. 1901
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Abner Townsend 86 N.W. 1007 Minn. 1901
Co., 50 *159 Minn. 438 , .
Village of Wayzata v. Great Northern Railway Co. 69 N.W. 1073 Minn. 1897
Village of Wayzata v. Great Northern Railway Co. 69 N.W. 1073 Minn. 1897
City of St. Paul v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 63 N.W. 267 Minn. 1895
City of St. Paul v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 63 N.W. 267 Minn. 1895
Village of Wayzata v. Great Northern R. Co., 50 Minn. 438 , .
Great Northern Railway Co. v. City of St. Paul 63 N.W. 96 Minn. 1895
Great Northern Railway Co. v. City of St. Paul 63 N.W. 96 Minn. 1895