Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lowry v. Akers, 52 N.W. 922.

23 citing documents.

Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. Jag Investments, Inc. 634 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 2001
3; see Smith v. Hurd, 50 Minn. 503, 507 , (holding, in the context of a mechanics’ lien action, that as to each defendant a lien action “is commenced and is pending only from the time of service of the summons on him” 6 (emphasis added)).
State v. Bies 103 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1960
*149 As to the application of the rule where mechanics lien statutes are involved, see Hokanson v. Gunderson, 54 Minn. 499 , ; Smith v. Hurd, 50 Minn. 503 , ; Burbank v. Wright, 44 Minn. 544 , ; McIntosh v. Schroeder, 154 Ill.
Olson & Serley Sash & Door Co. v. Juckem 204 N.W. 51 Minn. 1925
Smith v. Hurd, 50 Minn. 503 , , 36 Am.
Thompson Yards, Inc. v. Standard Home Building Co. 201 N.W. 300 Minn. 1924
We refer to Smith v. Hurd, 50 Minn. 503 , , 36 Am.
Crown Iron Works Co. v. Melin 198 N.W. 462 Minn. 1924
Crown Iron Works Co. v. Melin 198 N.W. 462 Minn. 1924
Northland Pine Co. v. Northern Insulating Co. 145 Minn. 395 , ; Lowry v. Akers, 50 Minn. 508 , ; Sprague v. Martin, 29 Minn. 226 , 13 N. *200 W. 34 ; Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Northland Pine Co. v. Northern Insulating Co. 177 N.W. 635 Minn. 1920
Northland Pine Co. v. Northern Insulating Co. 177 N.W. 635 Minn. 1920
In Lowry v. Akers, 50 Minn. 508 , , it was held that a lien on which redemption is made is not thereby merged and extinguished, but survives so far as may be necessary to the protection of the party redeeming.
Bauman v. Metzger 176 N.W. 497 Minn. 1920
ment of such labor or skilled ser *138 vices, or the furnishing of such materials and machinery, until the expiration .of two years after the completion of such skilled services or labor, or the furnishing of such materials or machinery, operate as a lien upon the several descriptions of structures and buildings, and upon the lots of ground on which they stand.” , In Smith v. Hurd, 50 Minn. 503 , , 36 Am.
McCormick v. Robinson 167 N.W. 271 Minn. 1918
In Smith v. Hurd, 50 Minn. 503 , , an action to .foreclose a mechanic’s lien, no service was made upon nonresident mortgagees until more than a year after the time for bringing the action had expired.
Morrison County Lumber Co. v. Duclos 163 N.W. 734 Minn. 1917
Paul Trust Co. 50 Minn. 445 , ; Smith v. Hurd, 50 Minn. 503 , , 36 Am.
Roberts v. Roberts 161 N.W. 148 Minn. 1917
547; Smith v. Hurd, 50 Minn. 503 , , 36 Am.
Seeger v. Young 149 N.W. 735 Minn. 1914
Smith v. Hurd, 50 Minn. 503 , , 36 Am.
Bagley v. McCarthy Bros. 104 N.W. 7 Minn. 1905
Bagley v. McCarthy Bros. 104 N.W. 7 Minn. 1905
It has been stated somewhat broadly that in cases of redemption under the statute “the intention of the party does not enter into account.” Gilfillan, C. J., in Lowry v. Akers, 50 Minn. 508, 514 , .
H. L. Spencer Co. v. Koell 97 N.W. 974 Minn. 1904
Smith v. Hurd, 50 Minn. 503, 507 , .
White v. Rathbone 75 N.W. 1046 Minn. 1898
White v. Rathbone 75 N.W. 1046 Minn. 1898
Bartleson v. Thompson, 30 Minn. 161 , ; Lowry v. Akers, 50 Minn. 508 , .
Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. King 75 N.W. 376 Minn. 1898
Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. King 75 N.W. 376 Minn. 1898
Lowry v. Akers, 50 Minn. 508 , .
Falconer v. Cochran 71 N.W. 386 Minn. 1897
Smith v. Hurd, 50 Minn. 503 , .
Sprandel v. Houde 56 N.W. 34 Minn. 1893
Sprandel v. Houde 56 N.W. 34 Minn. 1893
Lowry v. Akers, 50 Minn. 508 , ( 52 N. W. Rep.