Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lamprey v. State, 53 N.W. 1139.

70 citing documents.

In Re Rollins 738 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re Rollins 738 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In doing so, it takes judicial notice “that the Mississippi River is a navigable stream within the requirements specified in Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , 53 N.W.
Reads Landing Campers Ass'n v. Township of Pepin 546 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 1996
Reads Landing Campers Ass'n v. Township of Pepin 546 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 1996
This court, along with the majority of American jurisdictions, 2 has held that the rights of the riparian owner include the “right to accretions * * * formed or produced in front of his land by the action * * * of the water.” Lamprey v. Metcalf, 52 Minn. 181, 198 , 53 N.W.
Pratt v. State, Department of Natural Resources 309 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1981
Pratt v. State, Department of Natural Resources 309 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1981
Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181, 198 , 53 N.W.
State v. Slotness 185 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1971
State v. Slotness 185 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1971
Nelson v. DeLong, 213 Minn. 425 , 7 N. W. (2d) 342 ; State v. *487 Korrer, 127 Minn. 60 , ; Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , ; Miller v. Mendenhall, 43 Minn. 95 , .
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
The government surveyors had no power to determine navigability.” *468 The commissioner in argument before the district court referred to the statutory and case law prior to the enactment of L. 1909, c. 49, directing attention to Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , , 18 A. L. R. 670, which to some extent was incorporated in L. 1897, c. 257.
Johnson v. Seifert 100 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1960
Johnson v. Seifert 100 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1960
As to the true purpose of meander lines, see State v. Adams, 251 Minn. 521, 560 , 89 N. W. (2d) 661, 687 , certiorari denied, 358 U. S. 826 , 79 S. Ct. 45 , 3 L. ed. (2d) 67; Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181, 192 , , 18 L. R. A. 670; Poch v. Urlaub, 357 Mich.
State v. Adams 89 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1957
State v. Bollenbach 63 N.W.2d 278 Minn. 1954
State v. Bollenbach 63 N.W.2d 278 Minn. 1954
ther by steamboats, sailing vessels or flatboats — nor on an absence of occasional difficulties in navigation, but on the fact, if it be a fact, that the stream in its natural and ordinary condition affords a channel for useful commerce.” *117 Besides the federal test of navigability, Minnesota has a state test of navigability which originated in dicta of Mr. Justice Mitchell in Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181, 199 , , 18 L. R. A. 670, where this court said: “* * * Most of the definitions of ‘nav
State v. Longyear Holding Co. 29 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1947
State v. Longyear Holding Co. 29 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1947
In Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181, 198 , , 18 L. R. A. 670, 38 A. S. R. 541, Mr. Justice Mitchell again stated: “* * * where the lake is navigable in fact, its waters and bed belong to the state, in its sovereign capacity, and * * * the riparian patentee takes the fee only to the water’s edge, but with all the rights incident to ri
In Re Application of Baldwin to Vacate Lake Street 15 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 1944
In Re Application of Baldwin to Vacate Lake Street 15 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 1944
Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , , 18 L. R. A. 670, 38 A. S. R. 541; Madsen v. Larson, 117 Minn. 369 , ; State v. Korrer, 127 Minn. 60 , , L. R. A. 1916C, 139; Erickschen v. County of Sibley, 142 Minn. 37 , ; In re Petition of Schaller, supra; In re Petition of Krebs, 213 Minn. 344 , 6
Petraborg v. Zontelli 15 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1944
Petraborg v. Zontelli 15 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1944
R. 73; Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , ,.
Nelson v. Delong 7 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1942
Nelson v. Delong 7 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1942
Sanborn v. People’s Ice Co. 82 Minn. 43 , , 51 L. R. A. 829, 83 A. S. R. 401; Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , , 18 L. R. A. 670, 38 A. S. R. 541; Doemel v. Jantz, 180 Wis.
Schmidt v. Marschel 2 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1942
Schmidt v. Marschel 2 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1942
& Supp. § 1070; Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , , 18 L. R. A. 670, 38 A. S. R. 541; Shell v. Matteson, 81 Minn. 38 , ; Hanson v. Rice, 88 Minn. 273 , ; Tucker v. Mortenson, 126 Minn. 211 , .
Bybee v. City of Minneapolis 292 N.W. 617 Minn. 1940
Bybee v. City of Minneapolis 292 N.W. 617 Minn. 1940
Judicial notice can be taken that the Mississippi River is a navigable stream within the requirements specified in Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , , 18 L. R. A. 670, 38 A. S. R. 541.
Meyers v. Lafayette Club, Inc. 266 N.W. 861 Minn. 1936
Meyers v. Lafayette Club, Inc. 266 N.W. 861 Minn. 1936
Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , , 18 L. R. A. 670, 38 A. S. R. 541; State v. Korrer, 127 Minn. 60 , , L. R. A. 1914C, 139.
In Re Petition of Schaller 259 N.W. 529 Minn. 1935
In Re Petition of Schaller 259 N.W. 529 Minn. 1935
In Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , 192 , 53 N.W.
Bloomquist v. Sanders 202 N.W. 496 Minn. 1925
Bloomquist v. Sanders 202 N.W. 496 Minn. 1925
Lamphrey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , , 18 L. R. A. 670, 38 Am.
State ex rel. County of Jackson v. District Court of Thirteenth Judicial District ex rel. County of Nobles 178 N.W. 595 Minn. 1920
State ex rel. County of Jackson v. District Court of Thirteenth Judicial District ex rel. County of Nobles 178 N.W. 595 Minn. 1920
Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , , 18 L.R.A.
Erickschen v. County of Sibley 170 N.W. 883 Minn. 1919
Erickschen v. County of Sibley 170 N.W. 883 Minn. 1919
Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , , 18 L.R.A.
Rooney v. County of Stearns 153 N.W. 858 Minn. 1915
Rooney v. County of Stearns 153 N.W. 858 Minn. 1915
Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , , 18 L.R.A.
State v. Korrer 148 N.W. 617 Minn. 1914
State v. Korrer 148 N.W. 617 Minn. 1914
To hand over all these lakes to private owner *64 ship, under any old or narrow test of navigability, would be a great wrong upon the public for all time, the extent of which cannot, perhaps, be now even anticipated.” Mitchell, J. in Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181, 199, 200 , , 18 L.R.A.
Tucker v. Mortenson 148 N.W. 60 Minn. 1914
Tucker v. Mortenson 148 N.W. 60 Minn. 1914
59 ; Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , , 18 L.R.A.
Burton v. Isaacson 142 N.W. 925 Minn. 1913
Burton v. Isaacson 142 N.W. 925 Minn. 1913
Hanson v. Rice, 88 Minn. 273 , ; Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , .
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of Minneapolis 133 N.W. 169 Minn. 1911
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of Minneapolis 133 N.W. 169 Minn. 1911
This court has said, speaking of inland lakes: “AVe are satisfied that, so long as these lakes are capable of use for boating, even for pleasure, they are navigable, within the reason and spirit of the common-law rule.” Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , , 18 L.R.A.
Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co. 107 N.W. 405 Minn. 1906
Sherwin v. Bitzer 106 N.W. 1046 Minn. 1906
Sherwin v. Bitzer 106 N.W. 1046 Minn. 1906
272 , 19 L. Ed. 74 ; Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , , 18 L. R. A. 670, 38 Am.