Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite White v. Western Assurance Co., 54 N.W. 195.

28 citing documents.

JOHN W. THOMAS COMPANY v. Carlson-LaVine, Inc. 189 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1971
JOHN W. THOMAS COMPANY v. Carlson-LaVine, Inc. 189 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1971
Co. 52 Minn. 352 , ; Bauman v. Metzger, 145 Minn. 133 , ; Skolnick v. *34 Gruesner, 196 Minn. 318 , ; Holen v. M. A. C. 250 Minn. 130 , 84 N. W. (2d) 282 ; Ketterer v. Independent School Dist.
Winter v. Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union of America 107 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1961
Winter v. Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union of America 107 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1961
Co. 52 Minn. 352 , ; Bauman v. Metzger, 145 Minn. 133 , ; Skolnick v. Gruesner, 196 Minn. 318 , ; Holen v. M. A. C. 250 Minn. 130 , 84 N. W. (2d) 282 .
Holen v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission 84 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1957
Holen v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission 84 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1957
Co. 52 Minn. 352, 354, 355 , ; Skolnick v. Gruesner, 196 Minn. 318 , ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Borchardt v. Kulick 48 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1951
Borchardt v. Kulick 48 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1951
Co. 52 Minn. 352 , ; C. M. & St.
Behrendt v. Rassmussen 47 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1951
Behrendt v. Rassmussen 47 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1951
Co. 52 Minn. 352 , ; C. M. & St.
Nelson v. Nicollet Clinic 276 N.W. 801 Minn. 1937
Nelson v. Nicollet Clinic 276 N.W. 801 Minn. 1937
White v. Western Assurance Co. 52 Minn. 352 , ; Moquist v. Chapel, 62 Minn. 258 , ; Woodbridge v. *512 Sellwood, 65 Minn. 135 , ; Wessel v. Gigrich, 106 Minn. 467 , ; Lindquist v. Gibbs, 122 Minn. 205 , .
Bullock v. New York Life Insurance Co. 233 N.W. 858 Minn. 1930
Bullock v. New York Life Insurance Co. 233 N.W. 858 Minn. 1930
White v. Western Assurance Co. 52 Minn. 352 , ; George A. Hormel & Co. v. American Bonding Co. 112 Minn. 288 , , 33 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Bauman v. Metzger 176 N.W. 497 Minn. 1920
Bauman v. Metzger 176 N.W. 497 Minn. 1920
White v. Western Assurance Co. 52 Minn. 352 , ; Chicago, M. & St.
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Sprague 167 N.W. 124 Minn. 1918
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Sprague 167 N.W. 124 Minn. 1918
In Whitg v. Western *4 Assurance Co. 52 Minn. 352 , , after stating that the rule was generally as we have stated it above,- and applying that rule to the facts in the case, Chief Justice Gilfillan said: “The rule probably would not apply where the record shows conclusively that the party recovering is not entitled to recover,” * * * as “where it appears
Victor Produce Co. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 160 N.W. 201 Minn. 1916
Victor Produce Co. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 160 N.W. 201 Minn. 1916
White v. Western Assurance Co. 52 Minn. 352 , ; Laverne Citrus Assn. v. Chicago Great Western Ry.
Burkee v. Matson 130 N.W. 1025 Minn. 1911
Burkee v. Matson 130 N.W. 1025 Minn. 1911
White v. Western Assurance Co., 52 Minn. 352 , ; Davis v. Jacoby, 54 Minn. 144 , ; Burgraf v. Byrnes, 104 Minn. 343 , .
Foster v. Coughran 129 N.W. 853 Minn. 1911
Foster v. Coughran 129 N.W. 853 Minn. 1911
Babcock v. Sanborn, 3 Minn. 86 (141) ; White v. Western Assurance Co., 52 Minn. 352 , .
Roach v. Ætna Insurance 121 N.W. 613 Minn. 1909
Roach v. Ætna Insurance 121 N.W. 613 Minn. 1909
White v. Western Assurance Co., 52 Minn. 352 , .
Woodbridge v. Sellwood 67 N.W. 799 Minn. 1896
Woodbridge v. Sellwood 67 N.W. 799 Minn. 1896
Co., 52 Minn. 352 , , this-court held that 2 “it is a rule that generally this court will not decide-a cause upon an issue of fact or law not presented to and passed on by the trial court; and that, where it is unquestionable that the party tried his cause upon one theory, either of the facts or the law, in the court below