DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 55 N.W. 818.

44 citing documents.

  • Olson v. City of St. James 380 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Olson v. City of St. James 380 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Cloud, 54 Minn. 94, 98-99 , -21 (1893).
  • Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc. 255 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1977
  • Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc. 255 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1977
    800 (1918); City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , 55 N.W.
  • Pagett v. Northern Electric Supply Co. 167 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1969
  • Pagett v. Northern Electric Supply Co. 167 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1969
    It was the trial court’s opinion, in view of City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , , and later cases, that this responsibility was placed on the owner of the abutting premises and that use of the coalhole is immaterial as defendant cannot relieve himself *234 from responsibility by abandoning the hole, citing Bonniwell v. St.
  • Daly v. Bergstedt 126 N.W.2d 242 Minn. 1964
  • Daly v. Bergstedt 126 N.W.2d 242 Minn. 1964
    where although both parties are at fault and both liable to the person injured, yet they are not in pari delicto as to each other, as where the injury results from a violation by one of a duty which he owes to the other, so that, as between themselves, the act or omis *253 sion of the one from whom indemnity is sought is the primary cause of the injury.” See, also, City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , ; Olson v. Schultz, 67 Minn. 494 , , 36 L. R. A. 790; Dehn v. S. Brand Coal & Oil C
  • Larson v. City of Minneapolis 114 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1962
  • Larson v. City of Minneapolis 114 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1962
    arises where although both parties are at fault and both liable to the person injured, yet they are not in pari delicto as to each other, as where the injury results from a violation by one of a duty which he owes to the other, so that, as between themselves, the act or omission of the one from whom indemnity is sought is the primary cause of the injury.” See, also, City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , ; Olson v. Schultz, 67 Minn. 494 , , 36 L. R. A. 790; Dehn v. S. Brand Coal & Oil
  • Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 258 Minn. 368 Minn. 1960
  • Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 258 Minn. 368 Minn. 1960
    [19] City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , 55 N.W.
  • Sternitzke v. Donahue's Jewelers 83 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1957
  • Sternitzke v. Donahue's Jewelers 83 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1957
    City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , .
  • Sand v. City of Little Falls 55 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1952
  • Sand v. City of Little Falls 55 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1952
    Landru v. Lund, 38 Minn. 538 , ; Ray v. Jones & Adams Co. 92 Minn. 101 , ; Latell v.- Cunningham, 122 Minn, 144, ; Williams v. John A. Stees Co. Inc. 172 Minn. 35 , ; City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , ; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , .
  • Callahan v. City of Virginia 40 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1950
  • Callahan v. City of Virginia 40 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1950
    She cites in support of her theory Landru v. Lund, 38 Minn. 538 , ; City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , ; Ray v. Jones & Adams Co. 92 Minn. 101 , ; Latell v. Cunningham, 122 Minn. 144 , ; Palm v. City of Minneapolis, 143 Minn. 477 , ; Williams v. John A. Stees Co. Inc: 172 Minn. 35 , ; Shepstedt v. Hayes, 221 Minn. 74 , 21 N. W. (2d) 199 .
  • Shepstedt v. Hayes 21 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1945
  • Shepstedt v. Hayes 21 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1945
    2 Landru v. Lund, 38 Minn. 538 , ; Ray v. Jones & Adams Co. 92 Minn. 101 , ; Latell v. Cunningham, 122 Minn. 144 , ; Williams v. John A. Stees Co. Inc. 172 Minn. 35 , ; City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , ; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , .
  • Otten v. Big Lake Ice Co. 270 N.W. 133 Minn. 1936
  • Otten v. Big Lake Ice Co. 270 N.W. 133 Minn. 1936
    Typical of these cases are the following: Ray v. Jones & Adams Co. 92 Minn. 101 , ; Landru v. Lund, 88 Minn. 538 , ; City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , .
  • Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. v. McCarthy 236 N.W. 766 Minn. 1931
  • Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. v. McCarthy 236 N.W. 766 Minn. 1931
    Minneapolis Mill Co. v. Wheeler, 31 Minn. 121 , ; City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , .
  • Mix v. Downing 222 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
  • Mix v. Downing 222 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
  • Mix v. Downing 222 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
    City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , .
  • Mix v. Downing 222 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
    The question is answered by a mere statement of the fact that the evidence does not show that the lease included the place of the accident City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , 55 N.W.
  • Williams v. John A. Stees Co. Inc. 214 N.W. 671 Minn. 1927
  • Williams v. John A. Stees Co. Inc. 214 N.W. 671 Minn. 1927
    City of Wabasha v. Southworth, *40 54 Minn. 79 , .
  • Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co. 167 N.W. 800 Minn. 1918
  • Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co. 167 N.W. 800 Minn. 1918
    493; Geneva v. Brush Electric Co. 50 Hun, 581 , 3 N. Y. Supp. 595 : Blakeley v. Le Duc, 19 Minn. 152 (187); Minneapolis Mill Co. v. Wheeler, 31 Minn. 121 , ; City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , ; Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co. 114 Mass. 149 , 19 Am.
  • Weide v. City of St. Paul 148 N.W. 304 Minn. 1914
  • Weide v. City of St. Paul 148 N.W. 304 Minn. 1914
    Paul, 38 Minn. 134 , ; City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79, 87 , .
  • Butler Bros. v. American Fidelity Co. 139 N.W. 355 Minn. 1913
  • Butler Bros. v. American Fidelity Co. 139 N.W. 355 Minn. 1913
    This is the effect of Minneapolis Mill Co. v. Wheeler, supra, and City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79, 87 , , and the cases before cited.
  • Isham v. Broderick 95 N.W. 224 Minn. 1903
  • Isham v. Broderick 95 N.W. 224 Minn. 1903
    * * * If the premises are so constructed or in such a condition that the continuance of their use by the tenant must result in a nuisance to a third person, and a nuisance does so result, the landlord is'liable".” See also Kirby v. Boylston, 14 Gray, 249 , and also, as bearing upon the questions now before us, City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79, 88 , .
  • Olson v. Schultz 70 N.W. 779 Minn. 1897
  • Olson v. Schultz 70 N.W. 779 Minn. 1897
    City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , ; Erickson v. Brandt, 53 Minn. 10 , .
  • Harpel v. Fall 65 N.W. 913 Minn. 1896
  • Harpel v. Fall 65 N.W. 913 Minn. 1896
    In support of this legal proposition, counsel rely upon the following cases in this court: Nash v. Minneapolis Mill Co., 24 Minn. 501 ; City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , .
  • Korte v. St. Paul Trust Co. 56 N.W. 246 Minn. 1893
  • Korte v. St. Paul Trust Co. 56 N.W. 246 Minn. 1893
    o not understand that the plaintiff’s counsel find fault with the original construction of the walk, or of the coal hole, or of the manner in which it was covered, nor do they claim that either became out of repair; so that their client’s injuries were the result of negligence on the part of the owner of the property of the character considered in the recent case of City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , ( 55 N. W. Rep.