| a250623 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2025-11-03 |
Affirmed in part
|
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. L. and B. T., Parents., A25-0623, Court …
|
| a231762 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2024-06-03 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded; motion denied
|
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents
|
|
… e right to intervene in state-court proceeding for foster-care placement of or termination of parental rights to Indian child). The district court continued by stating that the Red Lake Nation had approved of the children’s placement with …
|
| a231284 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2024-05-06 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
Energy Transfer LP (formerly known as Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.) v. Greenpeace Interna…
|
|
… g disclosure “for investigations and proceedings in cases involving neglect or termination of parental rights” if the district court finds “good cause” for ordering disclosure. Id. at 658. The supreme court thus held that the privilege “d …
|
| A16-1096 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-12-27 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. M. T. and D. W. T., Parents.
|
|
… 3 This court will affirm a district court’s termination of parental rights if “at least one statutory ground for termination is supported by clear and convincing evidence and termination is in the best …
|
| A16-1087 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-12-12 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. L. M. and T. E. H., Parents.
|
|
… g in play, and ending visits early. In January 2015, OCCS filed a petition for termination of parental rights (TPR 1). After a 3 court trial in April 2015, the district court denied the pet …
|
| A16-309 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-06-27 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. A. K. and A. L. P., Sr., Parents.
|
|
… g various 7 statutes). Thus, “termination of parental rights is always discretionary with the juvenile court.” Id. at 136; compare Minn. Stat. § 645.44, subd. 15 (2014) (stating that “‘[m]a …
|
| A15-362 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-04-11 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
Donna Jean Sjolander f/k/a Donna Jean Carlson v. Steven Gary Carlson
|
|
… .W.2d 57, 64–65 (Minn. App. 1985) (stating that “[w]ith the exception of total termination of parental rights or permanent suspension of visitation, [temporary suspension of visitation] is the harshest sanction which can be imposed upon a …
|
| A14-1650 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2015-03-30 |
Affirmed in part
|
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. M. L. and E. R. L., Parents.
|
|
… ground supports the termination of the parental rights of each parent and (2) termination of parental rights is in the best interests of the children. Each parent promptly moved to vacate the default order terminating parental rights. …
|
| A13-2120 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2014-08-18 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
In the Matter of the CIVIL COMMITMENT OF Gary George SPICER
|
|
… 252 (Minn. App. 1986). The supreme court also has stated, in cases involving a termination of parental rights, that a district court’s findings of fact must “provide insight into which facts or opinions were most persuasive of the ultima …
|
| C8-87-688, C2-87-783 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
1987-12-08 |
Affirmed in part
|
In Re the Welfare of J.H.D.
|
|
… anuary 7, 1986. His target release date is May 2, 1988. An amended petition for termination of parental rights was dated May 22, 1986. At the hearings October 7, 8, 28 and 29, documentary evidence was introduced about the parents and their …
|