Minnesota Appellate Opinions

Published opinions of the Minnesota Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, collated from public records. 6 opinions matched.

Filtering by: Modified “sentencing departure” Full archive · 1930–present Limit to last 10 years Clear ×

Docket	Court	Filed	Disposition	Case
C2-02-25	Minn. Ct. App.	2002-07-09	Modified	State v. Simmons
… trict court’s verbal soliloquy demonstrated bias. Respondent maintains that the sentencing departure is supported by the record, because (a) the crime was a major economic crime; (b) there were multiple victims; (c) the crime was one of maj …
C5-99-654	Minn. Ct. App.	1999-09-07	Modified	State v. Donnay
… CHER, Judge. The State of Minnesota appeals from a dispositional and durational sentencing departure by the district court in the criminal vehicular operation conviction of respondent Chad Paul Donnay. We affirm as modified. FACTS Donnay wa …
C9-97-488	Minn. Ct. App.	1998-02-03	Modified	State v. Beard
… ion in declining to give the “rational hypothesis of innocence” instruction. 4. Sentencing Departure Beard argues that the trial court abused its discretion in departing upward from the presumptive sentence of 165 months to 360 months, a gr …
C9-95-2463	Minn. Ct. App.	1996-10-15	Modified	State v. Butterfield
… weapon in the trailer but guilty of the other eight charges. The state sought a sentencing departure with regard to duration and consecutive service. At the sentencing hearing, L.L. testified that her family had been traumatized by her orde …
C2-95-1333	Minn. Ct. App.	1996-04-02	Modified	State v. Davis
… rly similar to his theory of consent; (2) improperly based an upward durational sentencing departure on findings of fact that have no support in the record; and (3) erroneously entered judgments of conviction on both the charge of first-deg …
C4-92-1903	Minn. Ct. App.	1993-08-31	Modified	State v. Rodriguez
… eges the trial court abused its discretion in imposing a 50% upward dura-tional sentencing departure based upon the particular vulnerability of Flaherty. A trial court may depart from the sentencing guidelines when aggravating circumstances …