| A15-1811 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-10-31 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Joel Thomas Samuelson
|
|
… ppeal, he argues that his conviction should be reversed on the ground that the harassment restraining order violated his constitutional right to travel. We conclude that Samuelson is precluded from challenging the constitutionality of the …
|
| A15-1471 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-10-11 |
Affirmed
|
In the Marriage of: Robert Peter Crowley v. Bridget Marie Meyer
|
|
… ther court action. In April 2013, Crowley moved for, and received, an ex parte harassment restraining order against Meyer on behalf of himself and the two children. In July 2013, the district court ordered that Crowley retain te …
|
| A15-1701 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-10-11 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Juanel Anthony Mikulak
|
|
… 840 N.W.2d at 24, and in Gunderson, the defendant was charged with violating a harassment restraining order, and he testified that he did not believe that the order prohibited the actions for which he was charged. 812 N.W.2d at 159. Neit …
|
| A15-1879 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-09-19 |
Affirmed
|
Susan Esther Safstrom v. Justina Elise Morin, and Justina Elise Morin obo minor children …
|
|
… Justina Morin and Susan Safstrom are neighbors who each filed a petition for a harassment restraining order against the other to settle a lengthy feud mostly about smoke emanating from fires on Morin’s property. The district court granted …
|
| A16-146 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-08-29 |
Affirmed
|
Nathan Gregor v. Dawn Marie Buttera Gregor
|
|
… ing respondents Nathan Gregor and Stephanie Cunningham Gregor’s petition for a harassment restraining order (HRO) against her. Appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion by concluding she had engaged in harassment by m …
|
| A16-251 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-08-29 |
Affirmed
|
Sharper Management, LLC v. Melvin Pittel
|
| A15-1395 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-07-18 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. William James Nichols
|
|
… es that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction for violating a harassment restraining order (HRO). We affirm. FACTS P.F.-O. owns and operates an automotive-repair garage. P. …
|
| A15-1745 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-07-05 |
Affirmed
|
Brittany Ann Vacko v. Rebecca Lee Treptow
|
|
… reptow’s motion, concluding that Treptow “didn’t meet her burden to vacate the harassment restraining order under Minn. R. Civ. P. 60.02.” During this time period, Treptow was on probation for an unrelated matter. On November 5, 20 …
|
| A15-1373 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-06-20 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Douglas Ankney
|
|
… a person whom the peace officer has probable cause to believe has violated” a harassment restraining order. Minn. Stat. § 609.748, subd. 6(g) (2014) (emphasis added); see Minn. Stat. § 645.44, subd. 16 (“‘Shall’ is mandatory.”) (2014); …
|
| A15-2022 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-06-20 |
Affirmed in part and reversed in part
|
Lucas Heikkila, individually and o/b/o Minor Children v. Jeff Dietman
|
|
… court’s ex parte temporary harassment restraining order (THRO) and subsequent harassment restraining order (HRO), arguing: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the THRO; (2) the district court abused its discretion in excluding …
|