| C1-82-1629 |
Minn. |
1984-01-06 |
Stayed
|
State v. Haase
|
|
… er Minn. Stat. § 609.04 to adjudicate him guilty of both offenses, and that the sentencing departure was improper. 1 We affirm. It would serve no useful purpose to summarize the evidence on which defendant’s convictions were based. It is su …
|
| C4-81-562 |
Minn. |
1983-08-26 |
Affirmed
|
State v. Kindem
|
|
… representation of defendant by his trial counsel, and (9) the propriety of the sentencing departure. We affirm. The victim, Mr. Hoffman, owned three service stations. The closings of the stations were staggered so as to allow Hoffman to pi …
|
| C0-83-143 |
Minn. |
1983-08-26 |
Affirmed
|
State v. King
|
|
… AMDAHL, Chief Justice. This is an appeal by the state from a dispositional sentencing departure in the form of a stay of execution of a presumptively executed prison term of 1 year and 1 day for the offense of attempted aggravated robbery. …
|
| No. C7-82-1053 |
Minn. |
1983-04-22 |
Affirmed
|
State v. Boynton
|
|
… This is an appeal by the state, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 244.11 (1982), from a sentencing departure by the district court in the form of a stay of imposition of sentence in a ease in which the Sentencing Guidelines recommend imposition and …
|
| C2-82-196 |
Minn. |
1983-04-15 |
Granted
|
State v. Givens
|
|
… nexclusive list of aggravating factors to be considered in a decision to make a sentencing departure. Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines and Commentary, II.D.2(b) (1983). Three points must be made before analyzing the constitutional merit of d …
|
| C6-82-1030 |
Minn. |
1983-03-04 |
Stayed
|
State v. Running
|
|
… *120 AMDAHL, Chief Justice. This is an appeal from a sentencing departure with respect to consecutive service. The state did not file a respondent’s brief. We hold that the record on appeal fails to establish the presence of aggravating cir …
|
| C8-82-882 |
Minn. |
1983-02-18 |
Stayed
|
State v. Nelson
|
|
… y the state, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 244.11 (1982), from a downward durational sentencing departure by the sentencing judge, who imposed an executed prison term of 1 year and 1 day in a case where the presumptive sentence established by th …
|
| 82-595 |
Minn. |
1983-01-28 |
Dismissed
|
State v. Schmit
|
|
… a criminal defendant, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 244.11 (1982), from a durational sentencing departure. Defendant was charged by indictment with first-degree murder in the shooting death of his wife, but a district court jury found him guilty …
|
| C3-82-921 |
Minn. |
1983-01-28 |
Stayed
|
Jackson v. State
|
|
… onal departures. The state argued then, as it does now, that the propriety of a sentencing departure can only be attacked on direct appeal. The trial court refused to dismiss the petition on this ground. In denying relief, the trial court r …
|
| 82-1051 |
Minn. |
1983-01-21 |
Stayed
|
State v. Clemmer
|
|
… This is an appeal by the state, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 244.11 (1982), from a sentencing departure by the district court in the form of a stay of execution of sentence in a case in which the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines recommend impos …
|
| 82-779 |
Minn. |
1983-01-14 |
Stayed
|
State v. Hennessy
|
|
… This is an appeal by the state, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 244.11 (1980), from a sentencing departure by the district court in the form of a stay of imposition of sentence in a case in which the Sentencing Guidelines recommend execution of s …
|
| 81-767, 81-874 |
Minn. |
1982-06-11 |
Denied
|
State v. Carson
|
|
… the product of the violation of her right to counsel, and (4) propriety of the sentencing departure. We affirm. The robbery, which occurred on January 13,1981, was committed by two black women in their early thirties, one around 5 feet 10 …
|
| 81-585 |
Minn. |
1981-12-11 |
Reversed
|
State v. Erickson
|
|
… e v. Brouillette, 286 N.W.2d 702 (Minn.1979). 3. The third issue is whether the sentencing departure was justified. The parties agree on appeal that the presumptive sentence for the sex offense was 54 months. The presumptive sentence for th …
|