Statute
Ch. 609 · § 609.222
subd. 2
Minn. Stat. § 609.222, subd. 2
Minnesota statute — chapter 609, section 609.222, subdivision 2.
Opinions citing this statute
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A23-1062 | Minn. | 2025-12-10 | Reversed and remanded | State of Minnesota v. Lisa Dawn Oliver |
| a231062 | Minn. Ct. App. | 2024-08-19 | Reversed and remanded | State of Minnesota v. Lisa Dawn Oliver |
| a230732 | Minn. Ct. App. | 2024-05-06 | We affirm | State of Minnesota v. Dylan Thomas Peterson |
| A220960 | Minn. | 2024-03-20 | Affirmed | State of Minnesota v. John Ishmael Bradley, III |
| a230262 | Minn. Ct. App. | 2023-11-13 | Affirmed | Randy Terrell Mayberry v. State of Minnesota |
| A16-0957 | Minn. Ct. App. | 2017-02-21 | Affirmed | State of Minnesota v. Vernon Dale Howard, Sr. |
| A16-0243 | Minn. Ct. App. | 2016-12-27 | Reversed and remanded | State of Minnesota, vs.Daniel Irlas |
| A15-1891 | Minn. Ct. App. | 2016-10-24 | Affirmed | State of Minnesota v. Brock William Orwig |
| A15-829 | Minn. Ct. App. | 2016-05-23 | Affirmed | State of Minnesota v. Scott Jeffrey Hanson |
| A15-640 | Minn. Ct. App. | 2016-05-02 | Affirmed | State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Williams |
| A14-1647 | Minn. Ct. App. | 2015-08-17 | Affirmed | State of Minnesota v. Robert Castillo |
| A13-2322 | Minn. Ct. App. | 2014-12-22 | Affirmed | State of Minnesota v. Manuel Hernandes Ayala |
| No. A09-666 | Minn. | 2011-06-29 | Affirmed | Tucker v. State |
| A08-1424 | Minn. Ct. App. | 2009-08-25 | Denied | State v. Harlin |
| C6-01-2253 | Minn. Ct. App. | 2003-02-25 | Dismissed | State v. Copeland |
| C0-00-1198 | Minn. Ct. App. | 2001-06-05 | Denied | State v. Valentine |
| C1-99-1820 | Minn. Ct. App. | 2000-06-27 | Reversed | In Re the Welfare of U.S. |
| CX-98-1465 | Minn. | 2000-05-18 | Stayed | State v. Gustafson |
| C6-97-1727 | Minn. | 1999-04-01 | Affirmed | In Re the Welfare of A.A.E. |
| C5-96-493 | Minn. | 1997-12-18 | Affirmed | State v. Basting |
| CX-95-1628 | Minn. | 1997-04-24 | Denied | State v. Long |