Minnesota Appellate Opinions
Published opinions of the Minnesota Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, collated from public records.
10 opinions matched.
| Docket |
Court |
Filed |
Disposition |
Case |
| A24-0344 |
Minn. |
2025-07-02 |
Denied
|
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ryan Charles Rooney, Appellant
|
|
… ere to discuss what happened at the Residence Inn. They informed Rooney of his Miranda rights. When asked if he understood and would talk to the officers, Rooney verbally responded “yes” and wrote “y” on the paper. The interview lasted a …
|
| A17-0609 |
Minn. |
2019-06-12 |
Denied
|
State v. Lopez-Ramos
|
|
… interview by the law enforcement officer. But the officer read Lopez-Ramos his Miranda rights before starting the voluntary interview. Based on the circumstances, we assume without deciding that the interview was a custodial interrogation. …
|
| A18-0545 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2019-05-13 |
Denied
|
State v. Thompson
|
|
… le impaired. Officer Bendel placed handcuffs on Thompson's wrists, read him the Miranda warning, and placed him in the back seat of his patrol car. Officer Bendel asked the Red Lake dispatcher to contact the Beltrami County Sheriff's office …
|
| A18-0704 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2019-03-25 |
Denied
|
Otto v. Comm'r Safety
|
|
… 28, 2018); State v. Kline , 351 N.W.2d 388 , 390 (Minn. App. 1984) ("[G]iving a Miranda warning in an implied consent situation can be confusing to the driver."); Butler v. Comm'r of Pub. Safety , 348 N.W.2d 827 , 828 (Minn. App. 1984) (sta …
|
| A17-1410 |
Minn. |
2018-07-18 |
Denied
|
State v. Johnson
|
|
… was in the interrogation room at the start of questioning. Johnson was read her Miranda rights, and was twice told that she had the right to an attorney. Johnson stated that she understood her rights. During questioning, Johnson confirmed t …
|
| A17-0683 |
Minn. |
2018-06-06 |
Denied
|
State v. Vasquez
|
|
… n of his Fifth Amendment rights based on his medical distress and the lack of a Miranda warning. Vasquez also moved to suppress his medical records on the theory that those records were illegally seized. Vasquez did not invoke his medical p …
|
| A16-0229 |
Minn. |
2018-03-28 |
Denied
|
State v. Heinonen
|
|
… th Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Accordingly, a warning under Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), was not required and suppression of evidence is not justified. We therefore affirm. F …
|
| A16-1534 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2017-01-03 |
Denied
|
State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Plevell
|
|
… stify before the grand jury. The grand jury also considered petitioner’s post- Miranda statement to investigators. DECISION Petitioner seeks discretionary review of an order denying his motion …
|
| A15-1821 |
Minn. |
2016-10-19 |
Denied
|
State of Minnesota v. Jonas David Nelson
|
|
… erson. They told Nelson that the conversation would be recorded and gave him a Miranda warning. After the Miranda warning, Nelson asked whether he would have the right to refuse to answer a question, and the officers responded that he wou …
|
| A15-85 |
Minn. |
2016-08-24 |
Denied
|
State of Minnesota v. Anthony James Cox
|
|
… concluding at 4:45 a.m. Agent Wold began the interview by informing Cox of his Miranda rights. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). When asked whether he understood those rights, Cox answered, “Uh h …
|