10,813-(173) Precedential Dismissed. Processed

Oelschlegel v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed January 4, 1898 · 73 N.W. 631

Cited by

Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington 115 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1962
State Ex Rel. Associated Master Barbers & Beauticians v. Eischen 86 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 1957
Caswell v. Minar Motor Co. 60 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1953
In Re Dissolution of School District No. 33 60 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1953
State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of Mound 48 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1951
State Ex Rel. Lommen v. Gravlin 295 N.W. 654 Minn. 1941
State Ex Rel. v. City Council of Benson 209 N.W. 3 Minn. 1926
Town of Balkan v. Village of Buhl 197 N.W. 266 Minn. 1924
School District No. 135 v. McConnell 184 N.W. 369 Minn. 1921
State ex rel. Nordblum v. Burnquist 179 N.W. 371 Minn. 1920
State ex rel. Hilton v. Village of Kinney 178 N.W. 815 Minn. 1920
Hammer v. Narverud 171 N.W. 770 Minn. 1919

all 25 citing documents »

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Eckman v. Lauer 67 Minn. 221
St. Anthony Falls Bank v. Graham 67 Minn. 318

Opinion text

COLLINS, J. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries plaintiff had a verdict. Upon a settled case defendant corporation moved to set aside the verdict, and that judgment be entered in its favor notwithstanding the same. This appeal is from an order denying the motion. No motion was made in the court below for a new trial. The order is not appealable. It was so suggested in Eckman v. Lauer, 67 Minn. 221 , 69 N. W. 893 , and it was so held in St. Anthony v. Graham, 67 Minn. 318 , 69 N. W. 1077 . The only difference in the facts between the case last cited and the present is that there the motion was in the alternative, — for judgment, or for a new trial in case judgment was not ordered; the court denying the first, but granting the alternative, request, and the appeal being taken from that part of the order which denied the motion for judgment,— while here the motion was not in the alternative, but simply for an order for judgment, which was denied, whereupon defendant appealed. Of course there is no substantial difference in the facts. Appeal dismissed.