Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Abbott v. Moldestad, 77 N.W. 227.
- Thompson v. Kromhout 413 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Thompson v. Kromhout
413 N.W.2d 884
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , 77 N.W.
- Hilton v. Nelsen 283 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1979
-
Hilton v. Nelsen
283 N.W.2d 877
Minn. 1979
315 (1923); Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , 77 N.W.
- Kennedy v. Hasse 114 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1962
-
Kennedy v. Hasse
114 N.W.2d 82
Minn. 1962
Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , , 73 A. S. R. 348; O. W. Kerr Co. v. Nygren, 114 Minn. 268 , .
- Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell 94 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1959
-
Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell
94 N.W.2d 273
Minn. 1959
2 Bredesen v. Nickolay, 147 Minn. 304 , ; Enkema v. McIntyre, 136 Minn. 293 , , 2 A. L. R. 411; Coates v. Cooper, 121 Minn. 11 , ; Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co. 91 Minn. 451 , ; Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , , 73 A. S. R. 348; Buckley v. Patterson, 39 Minn. 250 , ; Austin v. Wacks, 30 Minn. 335 , .
- Twin City Building & Loan Ass'n v. Johnson 259 N.W. 551 Minn. 1935
-
Twin City Building & Loan Ass'n v. Johnson
259 N.W. 551
Minn. 1935
“If the contract has been entered into by a competent party, and is unobjectionable in its nature and circumstances, specific performance is as much a matter of course, and therefore of right, as are damages.” Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293, 299 , , 73 A. S. R. 348.
- Minnesota Building & Loan Ass'n v. Closs 234 N.W. 872 Minn. 1931
-
Minnesota Building & Loan Ass'n v. Closs
234 N.W. 872
Minn. 1931
Co. 159 Minn. 315 , , 38 A. L. R. 310; Schraiberg v. Hanson, 138 Minn. 80 , ; Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , ; Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , , 73 A. S. R. 348; Smith v. Lytle, 27 Minn. 184 , .
- Bowers v. Norton 210 N.W. 871 Minn. 1926
-
Bowers v. Norton
210 N.W. 871
Minn. 1926
The case has proceeded and judgment has been ordered for plaintiffs under the rule of Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , , 73 Am.
- Turner v. Even 199 N.W. 751 Minn. 1924
-
Turner v. Even
199 N.W. 751
Minn. 1924
These have also been considered by this court in Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , , 73 Am.
- Louwagie v. Haney 190 N.W. 892 Minn. 1922
-
Louwagie v. Haney
190 N.W. 892
Minn. 1922
Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , , 73 Am.
- Bredesen v. Nickolay 180 N.W. 547 Minn. 1920
-
Bredesen v. Nickolay
180 N.W. 547
Minn. 1920
Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , , 73 Am.
- School District 56 Consolidated v. Schmidt 178 N.W. 892 Minn. 1920
-
School District 56 Consolidated v. Schmidt
178 N.W. 892
Minn. 1920
This section is cited, and part of it quoted, in Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293, 298 , , 73 Am.
- Baker v. Polydisky 174 N.W. 526 Minn. 1919
-
Baker v. Polydisky
174 N.W. 526
Minn. 1919
Ct. 109, 32 L. ed. 500; McDermid v. McGregor, 21 Minn. 111, 116 ; Buckley v. Patterson, 39 Minn. 250 , ; Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , , 73 Am.
- Schultz v. Consolidated School District No. 1 168 N.W. 552 Minn. 1918
-
Schultz v. Consolidated School District No. 1
168 N.W. 552
Minn. 1918
See also Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293, 298 , , 73 Am.
- Shraiberg v. Hanson 163 N.W. 1032 Minn. 1917
-
Shraiberg v. Hanson
163 N.W. 1032
Minn. 1917
736; Wilson v. Fairchild, 45 Minn. 203 , ; Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , , 73 Am.
- Enkema v. McIntyre 161 N.W. 587 Minn. 1917
-
Enkema v. McIntyre
161 N.W. 587
Minn. 1917
Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , 77 N W. 227, 73 Am.
- Wellington v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 144 N.W. 222 Minn. 1913
-
Wellington v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.
144 N.W. 222
Minn. 1913
736; Reynolds v. Fleming, 43 Minn. 513 , ; Wilson v. Fairchild, 45 Minn. 203 , ; Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , , 73 Am.
- O. W. Kerr Co. v. Nygren 130 N.W. 1112 Minn. 1911
-
O. W. Kerr Co. v. Nygren
130 N.W. 1112
Minn. 1911
(2d Ed.) 106; Williams v. Langevin, 40 Minn. 180 , ; Fairchild v. Marshall, 42 Minn. 14 , ; Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , , 73 Am.
- Freeman v. Paulson 119 N.W. 651 Minn. 1909
-
Freeman v. Paulson
119 N.W. 651
Minn. 1909
And the vendor may proceed to enforce specific performance by such suit, whereby the vendee’s equitable *67 estate under the contract is sold in pursuance of a judicial decree which will operate as an assignment of the vendee’s rights under the contract, and whereby it would not operate as a cancellation of the contract itself.” Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , , 73 Am.