Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gould v. Winona Gas Co., 111 N.W. 254.
- State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc. 697 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc.
697 N.W.2d 636
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
See Gould v. Winona Gas Co., 100 Minn. 258, 266 , 111 N.W.
- Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co. 344 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 1984
-
Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co.
344 N.W.2d 856
Minn. 1984
They invite us to explicitly overrule Gould v. Winona Gas Co., 100 Minn. 258 , 111 N.W.
- Quigley v. Village of Hibbing 129 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1964
-
Quigley v. Village of Hibbing
129 N.W.2d 765
Minn. 1964
See, Gould v. Winona Gas Co. 100 Minn. 258 , , 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 889; Manning v. St.
- Wilson v. Home Gas Co. Inc. 125 N.W.2d 725 Minn. 1964
-
Distinguished
Wilson v. Home Gas Co. Inc.
125 N.W.2d 725
Minn. 1964
Paul Gaslight Co. 129 Minn. 55 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 1022, and Gould v. Winona Gas Co. 100 Minn. 258 , , 10 L.R.A.
- DeVries v. City of Austin 110 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1961
-
DeVries v. City of Austin
110 N.W.2d 529
Minn. 1961
Gould v. Winona Gas Co. 100 Minn. 258 , , 10 L.R.A.
- Willie v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 250 N.W. 809 Minn. 1933
-
Willie v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.
250 N.W. 809
Minn. 1933
Gould v. Winona Gas Co. 100 Minn. 258 , , 10 L.R.A.
- Power v. Village of Hibbing 233 N.W. 597 Minn. 1930
-
Power v. Village of Hibbing
233 N.W. 597
Minn. 1930
*70 Plaintiff invokes the rule of res ipsa loquitur, and cites Gould v. Winona Gas Co. 100 Minn. 258 , , 10 L.R.A.(N.S.)
- Ryan v. St. Paul Union Depot Co. 210 N.W. 32 Minn. 1926
-
Ryan v. St. Paul Union Depot Co.
210 N.W. 32
Minn. 1926
715 (fall of awning); Gould v. Winona Gas *290 Co. 100 Minn. 258 , , 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 889 (leak of gas from underground mains); Dahlen v. New York Life Ins.
- Bridgeman-Russell Co. v. City of Duluth 197 N.W. 971 Minn. 1924
-
Bridgeman-Russell Co. v. City of Duluth
197 N.W. 971
Minn. 1924
Co. 100 Minn. 258 , , 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 889, for see Wiltse v. City of Red Wing, 100 Minn. 548 , ; nor by City Water Power Co. v. City of Fergus Falls, 113 Minn. 33 , , 32 L. R. A. (N. S.) 59, Ann. Cas.
- Goar v. Village of Stephen 196 N.W. 171 Minn. 1923
-
Goar v. Village of Stephen
196 N.W. 171
Minn. 1923
1916E, 276; *234 Gould v. Winona Gas Co. 100 Minn. 258 , , 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 889.
- Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 186 N.W. 123 Minn. 1921
-
Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co.
186 N.W. 123
Minn. 1921
Co. 125 Minn. 348 , ; where a leak of gas from underground mains did damage, Gould v. Winona Gas Co. 100 Minn. 258 , , 10 L.R.A.(N.S.)
- Grimes v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co. 158 N.W. 623 Minn. 1916
-
Grimes v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co.
158 N.W. 623
Minn. 1916
1915E, 1022 ; Gould v. Winona *395 Gas Co. 100 Minn. 258 , , 10 L.R.A.
- Manning v. St. Paul Gaslight Co. 151 N.W. 423 Minn. 1915
-
Manning v. St. Paul Gaslight Co.
151 N.W. 423
Minn. 1915
This we deem decided in Gould v. Winona Gas Co. 100 Minn. 258 , , 10 L.R.A.(N.S.)
- Brantman v. City of Canby 138 N.W. 671 Minn. 1912
-
Brantman v. City of Canby
138 N.W. 671
Minn. 1912
Gould v. Winona Gas Co. 100 Minn. 258 , .
- Keever v. City of Mankato 129 N.W. 158 Minn. 1910
-
Keever v. City of Mankato
129 N.W. 158
Minn. 1910
As was said in Gould v. Winona Gas Co., 100 Minn. 258 , at page 264, , at page 256, 10 L.R.A.(N.S.)
- City Water Power Co. v. City of Fergus Falls 128 N.W. 817 Minn. 1910
-
City Water Power Co. v. City of Fergus Falls
128 N.W. 817
Minn. 1910
661], and Gould v. Winona Gas Co., 100 Minn. 258 [ ], and the numerous cases cited in those decisions.” 1.
- Sherman v. Winona Gas Co. 114 N.W. 654 Minn. 1908
-
Sherman v. Winona Gas Co.
114 N.W. 654
Minn. 1908
This cause was before us on a former appeal ( 100 Minn. 258 , , 10 L. R. A. [N. S.] 889), where the legal rights of the parties were establish *519 ed. The cause was remanded and tried a second time, resulting in a verdietfor plaintiffs for $200.
- Wiltse v. City of Red Wing 111 N.W. 1134 Minn. 1907
-
Wiltse v. City of Red Wing
111 N.W. 1134
Minn. 1907
It is true that in Gould v. Winona Gas Company, supra, page 258, , this court held that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied to damage caused by .the escape of gas from mains laid in the public street.