Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Holland v. Sheehan, 122 N.W. 1.

29 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
6 (“Public policy requires of courts of equity protection from unjust and unconscionable bargains .
Pamela Maslowski, Minn. 2020
See, –3 (Minn. 1909) (involving an agreement between a layperson and an attorney to find potential plaintiffs for personal injury suits in exchange for a percentage of the settlements); Gammons v. Johnson , 78 N.W.
Minter Bros. v. Hochman 42 N.W.2d 562 Minn. 1950
Minter Bros. v. Hochman 42 N.W.2d 562 Minn. 1950
Holland v. Sheehan, 108 Minn. 362 , ; 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) *163 510, 17 Ann. Cas.
In Re Estate of Peterson 42 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 1950
In Re Estate of Peterson 42 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 1950
Holland v. Sheehan, 108 Minn. 362 , 122 N.W.
Jacobson v. Barnes 222 N.W. 341 Minn. 1928
Jacobson v. Barnes 222 N.W. 341 Minn. 1928
Holland v. Sheehan, 108 Minn. 362 , , 23 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Bosshard v. County of Steele 217 N.W. 354 Minn. 1927
Parker v. Fryberger 214 N.W. 276 Minn. 1927
Parker v. Fryberger 214 N.W. 276 Minn. 1927
Even if the attorney Sheehan had made contracts with the clients secured by Holland to take their case for a fixed fee, win or lose, still the contract between Holland and Sheehan no doubt would have met the same fate as it did in Holland v. Sheehan, 108 Minn. 362 , , 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 510, 17 Ann. Cas.
Schlecht v. Schlecht 209 N.W. 883 Minn. 1926
Schlecht v. Schlecht 209 N.W. 883 Minn. 1926
It is urged that the contract between Schlecht and Rich is contrary to public policy for reasons stated in Gammons v. Johnson, 76 Minn. 76 , , and in Holland v. Sheehan, 108 Minn. 362 , , 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 510, 17 Ann. Cas.
Parker v. Fryberger 206 N.W. 716 Minn. 1925
Parker v. Fryberger 206 N.W. 716 Minn. 1925
Plaintiffs’ evidence and the findings of the jury, as embraced in the general and special verdict, put this case beyond the doctrine of Holland v. Sheehan, 108 Minn. 362 , , 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 510, 17 Ann. Cas.
Quinn v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 204 N.W. 156 Minn. 1925
Quinn v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 204 N.W. 156 Minn. 1925
If they were so coerced *325 they lacked also the power to conspire with defendant to do an unlawful act, and do not come within the denunciation of Holland v. Sheehan, 108 Minn. 362 , , 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 510, 17 Ann. Cas.
Lindblood v. Warren Mining Co. 194 N.W. 778 Minn. 1923
Lindblood v. Warren Mining Co. 194 N.W. 778 Minn. 1923
Butler v. Bohn, 31 Minn. 325 , ; Leveroos v. Reis, 52 Minn. 259 , ; Holland v. Sheehan, 108 Minn. 362 , , 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 510, 17 Ann. Cas.
Seitz v. Michel 181 N.W. 102 Minn. 1921
Seitz v. Michel 181 N.W. 102 Minn. 1921
96 ; Holland v. Sheehan, 108 Minn. 362 , , 23 L.R.A.(N.S.), 510, 17 Ann. Cas.
Holloway v. Dickinson 163 N.W. 791 Minn. 1917
Holloway v. Dickinson 163 N.W. 791 Minn. 1917
And we do not think the evidence conclusively shows that it was solicited so as to bring it within the condemnation of such cases as Gammons v. Johnson, 76 Minn. 76 , ; Gammons v. Gulbranson, 78 Minn. 21 , ; Holland v. Sheehan, 108 Minn. 362 , , 23 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Johnson v. Great Northern Railway Co. 151 N.W. 125 Minn. 1915
Johnson v. Great Northern Railway Co. 151 N.W. 125 Minn. 1915
Huber v. Johnson, 68 Minn. 74 , ; Gammons v. Johnson, 69 Minn. 488 , , 76 Minn. 76 , ; Gammons v. Gulbranson, 78 Minn. 21 , ; Holland v. Sheehan, 108 Minn. 362 , , 23 L.R.A.(N.S.)
De La Motte v. Northwestern Clearance Co. 148 N.W. 47 Minn. 1914
De La Motte v. Northwestern Clearance Co. 148 N.W. 47 Minn. 1914
§ 1885; Holland v. Sheehan, 108 Minn. 362 , , 23 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Buck v. Walker 132 N.W. 205 Minn. 1911
Buck v. Walker 132 N.W. 205 Minn. 1911
437 ; Holland v. Sheehan, 108 Minn. 362 , , 23 L.R.A.(N.S.)