Stromme v. Rieck
Cited by
- Metropolitan Sheet Metal Journeyman & Apprentice Training Trust Fund v. County of Ramsey 832 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 2013
- Burkholder v. Burkholder 43 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1950
- Hoyt v. Kittson County State Bank 230 N.W. 269 Minn. 1930
- Greber v. Harris 209 N.W. 30 Minn. 1926
- Swanson v. Alworth 196 N.W. 260 Minn. 1923
- Philadelphia Storage Battery Co. v. Hawley 191 N.W. 815 Minn. 1923
- Chicago Great Western Railroad v. Zahner 182 N.W. 904 Minn. 1921
- Blied v. Barnard 153 N.W. 305 Minn. 1915
- Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinley 152 N.W. 653 Minn. 1915
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- North v. Webster 36 Minn. 99
- Voak v. National Investment Co. 51 Minn. 450
- City of Winona v. Minnesota Railway Construction Co. 25 Minn. 328
- Manwaring v. O'Brien 75 Minn. 542
- Hanley v. Board of County Commissioners 87 Minn. 209
Opinion text
Per Curiam. This is an appeal from an order, made before judgment, granting-leave to file and serve a proposed supplemental complaint. Is such an order appealable? No. An order, made after judgment, allowing an amended or supplemental pleading, is appealable, because it. directly affects the judgment, and is a final order involving the merits, of the action, or some part thereof. North v. Webster, 36 Minn. 99 , 30 N. W. 429 ; Voak v. National Investment Co., 51 Minn. 450 , 53 N. W. 708 . If such an order is made before judgment, it may be reviewed on appeal from the judgment, when entered, or on an appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial, if the order allowing the amended or supplemental pleading was made on the trial as a part thereof, but no appeal lies from such order made before judgment. City of Winona v. Minn. R. C. Co., 25 Minn. 328 ; Manwaring v. O’Brien, 75 Minn. 542 , 78 N. W. 1 ; Hanley v. Board of Commrs.. of Cass County, 87 Minn. 209 , 91 N. W. 756 . Appeal dismissed.