Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marple v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad, 132 N.W. 333.

35 citing documents.

Sylvester L. Zurn, individually and as beneficiary of the Sylvester L. Zurn Trust, dated December 30, 2002, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co., (“The general rule undoubtedly is that where a party to a contract that is not void, but voidable, seeks to rescind by his own act, he must return or offer to return what he received under the contract.”); (Mi nn.
Doug Hoskin v. Josh Krsnak Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Doug Hoskin v. Josh Krsnak Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Louis Railway, the supreme court considered the same issue in the context of rescission of a settlement based on fraud and first stated, “The general rule undoubtedly is that where a party to a contract that is not void, but voidable, seeks to rescind by his own act, he must return or offer to return what he received under the contract.” -35 (Minn. 1911) (affirming the district 20 court’s denial of railroad’s posttrial motions after jury verdict for plaintiff who sought to rescind a settlement).
Doud v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 107 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1961
Doud v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 107 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1961
L. R. Co. 115 Minn. 262 , , Ann. Cas.
Clark v. Gronland 23 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1946
Clark v. Gronland 23 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1946
L. R. Co. 115 Minn. 262 , , Ann. Cas.
Elsen v. State Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. 17 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 1945
Elsen v. State Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. 17 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 1945
Co. 115 Minn. 262 , , Ann. Cas.
Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co. 278 N.W. 355 Minn. 1938
Mix v. Downing 222 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
Mix v. Downing 222 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
Mix v. Downing 222 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
L. R. Co. 115 Minn. 262 , , Ann. Cas.
Mix v. Downing 222 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
L. R. Co. 115 Minn. 262 , 132 N.W.
Hernlund v. Town & Country Motors, Inc. 198 N.W. 662 Minn. 1924
Hernlund v. Town & Country Motors, Inc. 198 N.W. 662 Minn. 1924
L. R. Co. 115 Minn. 262 , , Ann. Cas.
Keefe v. Jefferson 186 N.W. 789 Minn. 1922
Keefe v. Jefferson 186 N.W. 789 Minn. 1922
Louis R. Co. 115 Minn. 262 , , Ann. Cas.
Costello v. Sykes 172 N.W. 907 Minn. 1919
Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 171 N.W. 272 Minn. 1919
Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 171 N.W. 272 Minn. 1919
L. R. Co. 115 Minn. 262 , *78 , Ann. Cas.
Oestreich v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 167 N.W. 1032 Minn. 1918
Oestreich v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 167 N.W. 1032 Minn. 1918
L. R. Co. 115 Minn. 262 , , Ann. Cas.
Althoff v. Torrison 167 N.W. 119 Minn. 1918
Althoff v. Torrison 167 N.W. 119 Minn. 1918
L. R. Co. 115 Minn. 262 , , Ann. Cas.
Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 156 N.W. 251 Minn. 1916
Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 156 N.W. 251 Minn. 1916
L. R. Co. 115 Minn. 262 , , Ann. Cas.
Carlson v. Elwell 151 N.W. 188 Minn. 1915
Carlson v. Elwell 151 N.W. 188 Minn. 1915
L. R. Co. 115 Minn. 262 , ; Petterson v. Butler Bros. 123 Minn. 516 , .
Valley v. Crookston Lumber Co. 151 N.W. 137 Minn. 1915
Valley v. Crookston Lumber Co. 151 N.W. 137 Minn. 1915
Louis R. Co. 115 Minn. 262 , , Ann. Cas.
Clark v. Wells 149 N.W. 547 Minn. 1914
Clark v. Wells 149 N.W. 547 Minn. 1914
L. R. Co. 115 Minn. 262 , .
Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 137 N.W. 176 Minn. 1912
Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 137 N.W. 176 Minn. 1912
L. R. Co. 115 Minn. 262 , ; Thackrah v. Haas, 119 U. S. 499 , 7 Sup.