Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Smith v. Van Reed, 145 N.W. 967.

45 citing documents.

Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of Regents 683 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 2004
Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of Regents 683 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 2004
In Knapp v. State, we stated that the University “is a state institution established, controlled and carried on by the state itself.” 125 Minn. 194,197 , 145 N.W.
Bailey v. University of Minnesota 187 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1971
Bailey v. University of Minnesota 187 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1971
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , ; Regents v. Hart, 7 Minn. 45 (61).
Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman 91 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1958
Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman 91 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1958
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , ; 17 Dunnell, Dig.
Naftalin v. King 90 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1958
Naftalin v. King 90 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1958
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , ; 17 Dunnell, Dig.
Visina v. Freeman 89 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1958
Visina v. Freeman 89 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1958
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , ; Note, 6 Ann. Cas.
Volden v. Selke 87 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1958
Volden v. Selke 87 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1958
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194, 196 , , and cases cited therein.
State ex rel. Peterson v. Anderson 69 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1955
State ex rel. Peterson v. Anderson 69 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1955
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , .
Dunn v. Schmid 60 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1953
Dunn v. Schmid 60 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1953
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , .
In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by Luhrs 19 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1945
In re Burnquist 220 Minn. 129 Minn. 1945
In re Burnquist 220 Minn. 129 Minn. 1945
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , .
In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by Luhrs 19 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1945
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , 145 N.W.
Erickson v. King 15 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1944
Erickson v. King 15 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1944
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194, 199 , ; Lipinski v. Gould, 173 Minn. 559 , .
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Bentley 12 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1943
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Bentley 12 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1943
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , 196 , 145 N.W.
Moses v. Olson 255 N.W. 617 Minn. 1934
Moses v. Olson 255 N.W. 617 Minn. 1934
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , Rippe v. Becker, 56 Minn. 100, 117 , , 22 L. R. A. 857.
State Ex Rel. Benson v. Stanley 247 N.W. 509 Minn. 1933
State Ex Rel. Benson v. Stanley 247 N.W. 509 Minn. 1933
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , ; State, by Hilton, v. Voll, 155 Minn. 72 , ; State, by Benson, v. Erickson, 185 Minn. 60 , ; 2 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
State Ex Rel. Benson v. Erickson 239 N.W. 908 Minn. 1931
Fanning v. University of Minnesota 236 N.W. 217 Minn. 1931
Fanning v. University of Minnesota 236 N.W. 217 Minn. 1931
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , , involving the exercise of the power of eminent domain in taking private property for a right of way to connect by street railway the university campus and the university farm, reference was had to § 20; and Judge Taylor, referring to the territorial statute of 1851 and to the constitution of 185
In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. Paul 225 N.W. 86 Minn. 1929
In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. Paul 225 N.W. 86 Minn. 1929
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , .
State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. Chase 220 N.W. 951 Minn. 1928
State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. Chase 220 N.W. 951 Minn. 1928
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194, 198 , , as recognizing the university to be a “public institution * * * merely an agency of the state to exercise certain limited and specified powers.” The dictum of Gleason v. University of Minnesota, 104 Minn. 359, 362 , , that the university could not be relegated to the position “of a
Lipinski v. Gould 218 N.W. 123 Minn. 1928
Lipinski v. Gould 218 N.W. 123 Minn. 1928
Smith v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , 145 N.W.
State ex rel. Hilton v. Voll 192 N.W. 188 Minn. 1923
State ex rel. Hilton v. Voll 192 N.W. 188 Minn. 1923
We think the action of the commissioner of highways in selecting land for the right of way for a trunk highway is of the same finality as that of the voters of a school district selecting a school site in School District No. 40 v. Bolstad, 121 Minn. 376 , , of the board of regents selecting a route for a street car line in State v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , , and of the municipal officers designating land for a library building in Hayford v. Bangor, 102 Me. 340 , 66 Atl.
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Pioneer Fuel Co. 181 N.W. 341 Minn. 1921
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Pioneer Fuel Co. 181 N.W. 341 Minn. 1921
“The power * * * inheres in the state as an attribute of its sovereignty, and is vested in the legislature.” State v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , .
State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. District Court of Fourth Judicial District 158 N.W. 240 Minn. 1916
State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. District Court of Fourth Judicial District 158 N.W. 240 Minn. 1916
640; State v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , .
Webb v. Lucas 147 N.W. 273 Minn. 1914
Webb v. Lucas 147 N.W. 273 Minn. 1914
1182; State v. Van Reed, 125 Minn. 194 , , 88 Am.