Cited by

522, 522 (Minn. 1917) ; (“The official returns are evidence of the votes cast” and are presumed to “correctly state the result of an accurate count of the ballots”); Taylor v. Taylor , 10 Minn. 107, 112 (Minn. 1865) (stating that the certified results of an election are “prima facie evidence of the facts therein stated”)

We addressed a similar situation in Moon v. Harris, 122 Minn. 138 , 142 N.W.

We addressed a similar situation in Moon v. Harris, 122 Minn. 138 , 142 N.W.

on, 25 Minn, at 108-09, 1878 WL 3561 , at **2 (“With reference to the analogies of our general statutory law respecting the canvassing of votes cast at elections, the word ‘returns’ is entitled to be taken as meaning an official statement of votes cast at an election, transmitted to some authorized custodian, for the purpose of being canvassed by some proper authority.”); see also Moon v. Harris, 122 Minn. 138, 141-43 , 142 N.W.

See, Christenson v. Allen, supra, Moon v. Harris, 122 Minn. 138 , 142 N.W.

Contestant correctly asserts, under Moon v. Harris, 122 Minn. 138 , , that all that need be done is to apprise the adversary of the grounds of the contest so that he may be given a fair opportunity to meet asserted claims.

The appeal in Prenevost v. Delorme, 129 Minn. 359 , , was from a judgment, and in Moon v. Harris, 122 Minn. 138 , , from an order denying a motion for new trial.

Newton v. Newell, 26 Minn. 529 , ; O’Gorman v. Richter, 31 Minn. 25 , ; Moon v. Harris, 122 Minn. 138 , ; Schultz v. Shelp, 131 Minn. 303 , ; McVeigh v. Spang, 178 Minn. 578 , .

Moon v. Harris, 122 Minn. 138 , ; Schultz v. Shelp, 131 Minn. 303 , .

Moon v. Harris, 122 Minn. 138 , 142 N.W.

Taylor v. Taylor, 10 Minn. 81 (107); Blake v. Hogan, 57 Minn. 45 , 58 N W. 867; Moon v. Harris, 122 Minn. 138 , 142 N W. 12.

Moon v. Harris, 122 Minn. 138 , .