Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schaar v. Conforth, 151 N.W. 275.

79 citing documents.

  • Butler v. Engel 68 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1954
  • Butler v. Engel 68 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1954
    (3 ed.) § 6976; Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Wessman v. Scandrett, 217 Minn. 312 , 14 N. W. (2d) 445 ; Flaherty v. G. N. Ry.
  • Olson v. Evert 28 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1947
  • Olson v. Evert 28 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1947
    795 ; Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , 151 N.W.
  • Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 27 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1947
  • Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 27 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1947
    811, 812 , where the court said: “* * * Though the violation of a statutory duty may constitute negligence per se and actionable if injury result therefrom, nevertheless, statutes imposing such duties are not so construed as to abrogate the ordinary rules of contributory negligence, unless so worded as to leave no doubt that the legislature intended to exclude the defense.” In Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460, 462 , , this court said: “* * * the settled law is that if the violation of the statu
  • Kaiser v. Butchart 274 N.W. 680 Minn. 1937
  • Kaiser v. Butchart 274 N.W. 680 Minn. 1937
    R. 47; Osborne v. McMasters, 40 Minn. 103 , , 12 A. S. R. 698; Perry v. Tozer, 90 Minn. 431 , , 101 A. S. R. 416; Anderson v. Settergren, 100 Minn. 294 , ; Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Frederick V. McRae, 157 Minn. 366 , .
  • Jewell v. Blanchett Investment Co. 271 N.W. 461 Minn. 1937
  • Jewell v. Blanchett Investment Co. 271 N.W. 461 Minn. 1937
    Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Benson v. Larson, 133 Minn. 346 , ; Suess v. Arrowhead S. P. Co. 180 Minn. 21 , .
  • Martin v. Tracy 246 N.W. 6 Minn. 1932
  • Martin v. Tracy 246 N.W. 6 Minn. 1932
    It was applied to motor vehicle traffic, perhaps for the first time in this state, in Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , .
  • Mechler v. McMahon 239 N.W. 605 Minn. 1931
  • Mechler v. McMahon 239 N.W. 605 Minn. 1931
  • Mechler v. McMahon 239 N.W. 605 Minn. 1931
    Co. 121 Minn. 445 , ; Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Benson v. Larson, 133 Minn. 346 , ; Hillstrom v. Mannheimer Bros. 146 Minn. 202 , ; Thomas v. Stevenson, 146 Minn. 272 , ; Unmacht v. Whitney, 146 Minn. 327 , ; Farrell v. G. O. Miller Co. 147 Minn. 52 , ; Cohen v. Silverman, *479
  • Mechler v. McMahon 239 N.W. 605 Minn. 1931
    795 ; Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , 151 N.W.
  • Olesen v. Retzlaff 238 N.W. 12 Minn. 1931
  • Olesen v. Retzlaff 238 N.W. 12 Minn. 1931
    The court in this case cites Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , 151 N.W.
  • Salera v. Schroeder 237 N.W. 180 Minn. 1931
  • Salera v. Schroeder 237 N.W. 180 Minn. 1931
    If such violation Avas the proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury, liability follows as matter of law, under the rule of Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , , unless he could justify or excuse his conduct under the principle of Dohm *481 v. R. N. Cardozo & Brother, 165 Minn. 193 , .
  • Peterson v. Miller 235 N.W. 15 Minn. 1931
  • Peterson v. Miller 235 N.W. 15 Minn. 1931
    Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Unmacht v. Whitney, 146 Minn. 327 , ; Elvidge v. Stronge & Warner Co. 148 Minn. 185 , ; Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo & Brother, 165 Minn. 193 , ; Sandhofner v. Calmenson, 170 Minn. 69 , ; Edblad v. Brower, 178 Minn. 465 , ; 3 Dunne
  • Weber v. J. E. Barr Packing Corp. 234 N.W. 682 Minn. 1931
  • Weber v. J. E. Barr Packing Corp. 234 N.W. 682 Minn. 1931
    Co. 121 Minn. 445 , ; Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo & Brother, 165 Minn. 193 , .
  • Saunders v. Yellow Cab Corp. 233 N.W. 599 Minn. 1930
  • Saunders v. Yellow Cab Corp. 233 N.W. 599 Minn. 1930
    Co. 121 Minn. 445 , ; Schaar v. *65 Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Heiden v. Minneapolis St.
  • Harrsch v. Breilien. 232 N.W. 710 Minn. 1930
  • Harrsch v. Breilien. 232 N.W. 710 Minn. 1930
    Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo & Brother, 165 Minn. 193 , , and cases cited; 4 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
  • Suess v. Arrowhead Steel Products Co. 230 N.W. 125 Minn. 1930
  • Suess v. Arrowhead Steel Products Co. 230 N.W. 125 Minn. 1930
    Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Benson v. Larson, 133 Minn. 346 , ; Riser v. Smith, 136 Minn. 417 , ; Farrell v. G. O. Miller Co. 147 Minn. 52 , ; Elvidge v. Stronge & Warner Co. 148 Minn. 185 , ; Cohen v. Silverman, 153 Minn. 391 , ; Frederick v. McRae, 157
  • Christopherson v. Custom Laundry Co. 229 N.W. 136 Minn. 1930
  • Christopherson v. Custom Laundry Co. 229 N.W. 136 Minn. 1930
    See also Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Benson v. Larson, 133 Minn. 346 , ; Hillstrom v. Mannheimer Brothers, 146 Minn. 202 , ; Farrell v. G. O. Miller Co. 147 Minn. 52 , ; Elvidge v. Strong & Warner Co. 148 Minn. 185 , ; Cohen v. Silverman, 153 Minn. 391 , ; Frederi
  • Vukos v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 217 N.W. 125 Minn. 1927
  • Vukos v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 217 N.W. 125 Minn. 1927
    Van Doren v. Wright, 65 Minn. 80 , , ; Rihmann v. Grant Const. Co. 114 Minn. 484 , ; Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Anderson v. Wormser, 129 Minn. 8 , ; Zakrzewski v. G. N. Ry.
  • Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co. 213 N.W. 546 Minn. 1927
  • Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co. 213 N.W. 546 Minn. 1927
    At common law the fact that the injured person was doing an illegal act when he was injured did not in and of *81 itself constitute contributory negligence, Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , .
  • Sandhofner v. Calmenson 212 N.W. 11 Minn. 1927
  • Sandhofner v. Calmenson 212 N.W. 11 Minn. 1927
    Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Farrell v. G. O. Miller Co. 147 Minn. 52 , ; McMahon v. Flynn, 154 Minn. 326 , ; Frederick v. McRae, 157 Minn. 366 , ; Dohm v. Cardozo, 165 Minn. 193 , .
  • Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo Brother 206 N.W. 377 Minn. 1925
  • Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo Brother 206 N.W. 377 Minn. 1925
    Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Benson v. Larson, 133 Minn. 346 , ; Thomas v. Stevenson, 146 Minn. 272 , ; Farrell v. G. O. Miller Co. 147 Minn. 52 , ; Elvidge v. Strong & Warner Co. 148 Minn. 185 , ; Cohen v. Silverman, 153 Minn. 391 , ; Frederick v. McRae
  • O'Connor v. Sinykin 202 N.W. 891 Minn. 1925
  • O'Connor v. Sinykin 202 N.W. 891 Minn. 1925
    Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Gibbs v. Almstrom, 145 Minn. 35 , , 11 A. L. R. 227; Syck v. D. St.
  • Kennedy v. Hedberg 198 N.W. 302 Minn. 1924
  • Kennedy v. Hedberg 198 N.W. 302 Minn. 1924
    Neither is the appellant aided by Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , .
  • Frederick v. McRae 196 N.W. 270 Minn. 1923
  • Flaaten v. Lyons 196 N.W. 478 Minn. 1923
  • Flaaten v. Lyons 196 N.W. 478 Minn. 1923
    Co. 121 Minn. 445 , ; Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , .
  • Frederick v. McRae 196 N.W. 270 Minn. 1923
    698; Perry v. Tozer, 90 Minn. 438 , ; Anderson v. Settergren, 100 Minn. 294 , ; Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Farrell v. G. O. Miller Co. 147 Minn. 52 , .
  • Heiden v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 191 N.W. 254 Minn. 1922
  • Heiden v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 191 N.W. 254 Minn. 1922
    Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , , and cases cited therein.