Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lawler v. Dunn, 176 N.W. 989.

37 citing documents.

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against David L. Ludescher, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 194347. ... Minn. 2023
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against David L. Ludescher, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 194347. ... Minn. 2023
In Lawler v. Dunn, however, this court explained that “[t]he right of a client to discharge his attorney at his election, with or without cause, is universally recognized by the authorities.”
Faricy Law Firm, P.A. v. API, Inc. Asbestos Settlement Trust 912 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2018
Faricy Law Firm, P.A. v. API, Inc. Asbestos Settlement Trust 912 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2018
761 (Minn. 2015) ; Lawler v. Dunn , 145 Minn. 281 , 176 N.W.
Meshbesher & Associates PA, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Lawler v. Dunn, 145 Minn. 281, 283, 176 N.W.
In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
Stowman argues that we should extend our holding in Lawler v. Dunn, 145 Minn. 281, 176 N.W.
Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 784 N.W.2d 220 Minn. 2010
Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Sybaritic’s argument is based on the traditional rule that a client may discontinue an attorney-client relationship at any time, with or without cause, and without penalty, see Lawler v. Dunn, 145 Minn. 281, 283 , 176 N.W.
Nordling v. Northern States Power Co. 478 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1991
Nordling v. Northern States Power Co. 478 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1991
Lawler v. Dunn, 145 Minn. 281, 284 , 176 N.W.
Michaelson v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 474 N.W.2d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Michaelson v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 474 N.W.2d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Lawler v. Dunn, 145 Minn. 281, 284 , 176 N.W.
Nordling v. Northern States Power Co. 465 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Nordling v. Northern States Power Co. 465 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See, e.g., Lawler v. Dunn, 145 Minn. 281, 284 , 176 N.W.
Trenti, Saxhaug, Berger, Roche, Stephenson, Richards & Aluni, Ltd. v. Nartnik 439 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Trenti, Saxhaug, Berger, Roche, Stephenson, Richards & Aluni, Ltd. v. Nartnik 439 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Lawler v. Dunn, 145 Minn. 281, 284 , 176 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Seifert v. Smith 110 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1961
State Ex Rel. Seifert v. Smith 110 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1961
Lawler v. Dunn, 145 Minn. 281 , ; Meagher v. Kavli, 251 Minn. 477 , 88 N. W. (2d) 871 .
Meagher v. Kavli 88 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1958
Meagher v. Kavli 88 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1958
961 ; Lawler v. Dunn, 145 Minn. 281 , 176 N.W.
Anderson v. High 300 N.W. 597 Minn. 1941
Anderson v. High 300 N.W. 597 Minn. 1941
Krippner v. Matz, 205 Minn. 497, 504 , ; Lawler v. Dunn, 145 Minn. 281, 284 , .
Krippner v. Matz 287 N.W. 19 Minn. 1939
Krippner v. Matz 287 N.W. 19 Minn. 1939
If the client has this right as an implied condition of the contract under the law, it follows as a natural consequence that he cannot be compelled to pay damages for exercising that right which his contract gives him.” Lawler v. Dunn, 145 Minn. 281, 284 , .
Pye v. Diebold 283 N.W. 487 Minn. 1939
Pye v. Diebold 283 N.W. 487 Minn. 1939
onsequence that he cannot be compelled to pay damages for exercising that right which his contract gives him.” That rule “secures to the attorney the right to recover the reasonable value of the services which he has rendered, and is well calculated to promote public confidence in the members of an honorable profession whose relation to their clients is personal and confidential.” Lawler v. Dunn, 145 Minn. 281, 284 , .
State Ex Rel. Larson v. Probate Court 283 N.W. 545 Minn. 1938
State Ex Rel. Larson v. Probate Court 283 N.W. 545 Minn. 1938
Lawler v. Dunn, 145 Minn. 281, 284 , .
Charles v. Quinn 281 N.W. 815 Minn. 1938
Charles v. Quinn 281 N.W. 815 Minn. 1938
serts “that a contract made Avith an attorney for professional services, unless in the nature of a retainer over a period of time, can be terminated at Avill by the client, in Avhich event, there is no longer any contract and counsel is only entitled to the reasonable value of his services rendered during the existence of the relationship * * In support of this contention he cites Lawler v. Dunn, 145 Minn. 281 , ; Seibert v. Seibert, 186 Minn. 274 , ; Martin v. Camp, 219 N. Y. 170 , 114 N. E. 46
Seibert v. Seibert 243 N.W. 59 Minn. 1932
Seibert v. Seibert 243 N.W. 59 Minn. 1932
Lawler v. Dunn, 115 Minn. 28 .1, .
Meacham v. Ballard Co. Inc. 240 N.W. 540 Minn. 1931
Miner v. Payne 184 N.W. 673 Minn. 1921
Miner v. Payne 184 N.W. 673 Minn. 1921
Citing Lawler v. Dunn, 145 Minn. 281 , , appellant insists that there could be no recovery without proof of the reasonable value of intervener’s services, and that he could not rely on his contraci with plaintiff to establish the amount of his recovery.