DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 200 N.W. 481.

34 citing documents.

  • Crown Coco, Inc. v. Red Fox Restaurant of Royalton, Inc. 409 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Crown Coco, Inc. v. Red Fox Restaurant of Royalton, Inc. 409 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    446 (1925) (parol evidence permitted to show extent of leasehold identified only by name of apartment building and street number); see also Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414, 423 , 200 N.W.
  • Burns v. Stewart 188 N.W.2d 760 Minn. 1971
  • Burns v. Stewart 188 N.W.2d 760 Minn. 1971
    In the Waller case, this court held ( 160 Minn. 432 , ): “A court of equity, independent of an action for divorce or separation, and though grounds for such action do not exist, has jurisdiction to decree the wife support or maintenance.
  • Gittleman v. Fesenmaier 128 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1964
  • Gittleman v. Fesenmaier 128 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1964
    1 Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312, 314 , , 3 L. R. A. 739; Smith v. Kurtzenacker, 147 Minn. 398, 401 , ; Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414, 420 , ; 6 Williston, Contracts (3 ed.) § 878; 3 American Law of Property, § 11.49, p. 141; 8A Thompson, Real Property, § 4487, p. 530; Restatement, Contracts, § 283; Annotation, 57 A. L. R. 1253, 1515.
  • COMMON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2386 v. County of Wabasha 121 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1963
  • COMMON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2386 v. County of Wabasha 121 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1963
    Pipestone County, 246 Minn. 110 , 74 N. W. (2d) 419 ; Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414 , .
  • Daly v. Duwane Construction Co. 106 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1960
  • Daly v. Duwane Construction Co. 106 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1960
    Curtiss & Yale Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 344 , ; Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414 , ; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell 94 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1959
  • Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell 94 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1959
    See, McKay v. Ryan, 204 Minn. 480 , ; Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414 , ; John v. Timm, 153 Minn. 401 , ; Johnson v. Herbst, 140 Minn. 147 , .
  • Miracle Construction Co. v. Miller 87 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1958
  • Miracle Construction Co. v. Miller 87 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1958
    Bank, 173 Minn. 225 , ; Swallow v. Strong, 83 Minn. 87 , ; Nippolt v. Kammon, 39 Minn. 372 , ; Ham v. Johnson, 51 Minn. 105 , ; Tice v. Freeman, 30 Minn. 389 , ; Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414, 422 , .
  • Gondreau v. Beliveau 297 N.W. 352 Minn. 1941
  • Gondreau v. Beliveau 297 N.W. 352 Minn. 1941
    § 5234; Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414 , ; St.
  • McKay v. Ryan 284 N.W. 57 Minn. 1939
  • McKay v. Ryan 284 N.W. 57 Minn. 1939
    Under our holding in Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414 , , a contract from the Lindgrens, who were owners of the fee title, justified the defendants in entering into a contract for deed Avith the plaintiff.
  • Zuelke v. Papke 241 N.W. 577 Minn. 1932
  • Zuelke v. Papke 241 N.W. 577 Minn. 1932
    See Noyes v. Brown, 142 Minn. 211 , ; Benjamin v. Savage, 154 Minn. 159 , , 35 A. L. R. 97; Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414 , ; Bowers v. Norton, 169 Minn. 198 , ; 6 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
  • W. T. Bailey Lumber Co. v. Hendrickson 240 N.W. 666 Minn. 1932
  • W. T. Bailey Lumber Co. v. Hendrickson 240 N.W. 666 Minn. 1932
    The principle that the vendor may discharge his obligation from the money which he receives as stated in Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414 , , seems applicable.
  • Elder v. Elwell 220 N.W. 415 Minn. 1928
  • Elder v. Elwell 220 N.W. 415 Minn. 1928
    In substance the same statement was made in Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414 , .
  • Bowers v. Norton 210 N.W. 871 Minn. 1926
  • Bowers v. Norton 210 N.W. 871 Minn. 1926
    See also Paynesville L. Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414 , .
  • Hissam v. Rusch 209 N.W. 741 Minn. 1926
  • Hissam v. Rusch 209 N.W. 741 Minn. 1926
    Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414 , .
  • Joslyn v. Irwin-Dick Co. 209 N.W. 889 Minn. 1926
  • Joslyn v. Irwin-Dick Co. 209 N.W. 889 Minn. 1926
    Lynch v. Higgins, 154 Minn. 151 , ; McChesney v. Oppek, 156 Minn. 260, 265 , ; Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414 , .
  • Summers v. Midland Co. 209 N.W. 323 Minn. 1926
  • Summers v. Midland Co. 209 N.W. 323 Minn. 1926
    Co. 126 Minn. 72 , ; Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414 , ; Trainer v. Lammers, 161 Minn. 336 , .
  • Trainer v. Lammers 201 N.W. 540 Minn. 1925
  • Trainer v. Lammers 201 N.W. 540 Minn. 1925
    n v. Herbst, 140 Minn. 147 , ; Brown v. California and W. L. Co. 145 Minn. 432 , ; Lynch v. Higgins, 154 Minn. 151 , ; Lutz v. Fults, 155 Minn. 207 , ; McChesney v. Oppek, 156 Minn. 260 , ; Seerup v. Goraczkowski, 159 Minn. 364 , ; Trainer v. Lammers, 152 Minn. 415 , ; Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414 , .