Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Baker, 200 N.W. 815.

29 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
to be dete rmined on appeal by a consideration of all the evidence presented in the case.”); State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1, 2, 200 N.W.
State v. Smith 119 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1962
State v. Smith 119 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1962
State v. Korsch, 168 Minn. 354 , ; State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , ; State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92 , , Í4 Ann. Cas.
State v. Armstrong 101 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1960
State v. Armstrong 101 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1960
State v. Korsch, 168 Minn. 354 , ; State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , ; State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92 , , 14 Ann. Cas.
State v. Sandefur 82 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1957
State v. Sandefur 82 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1957
State v. Rasmussen, 241 Minn. 310 , 63 N. W. (2d) 1 ; State v. Scott, 203 Minn. 56 , ; State v. Jackson, 198 Minn. 111 , ; State v. Korsch, 168 Minn. 354 , ; State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , ; State v. Smith, 144 Minn. 348 , .
State v. Star 81 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1957
State v. Star 81 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1957
State v. Scott, 203 Minn. 56 , ; State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , .
State v. Golden 12 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1943
State v. Golden 12 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1943
tion to dismiss defendant elects to proceed further and present evidence on the issue or issues and further evidence is received, whether by defendant’s witnesses or by the state, the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict or decision is then to be determined on appeal by a consideration of all the evidence presented in the case.” To the same effect are State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , ; State v. Omodt, 198 Minn. 165 , ; State v. Tsiolis, 202 Minn. 117 , .
State v. Hokenson 300 N.W. 193 Minn. 1941
State v. Hokenson 300 N.W. 193 Minn. 1941
*74 The second and third assignments may easily be disposed of since we have held in several cases that in criminal cases “a new trial will not be granted for refusal to dismiss when the state rested, if the evidence as finally in warrants the conviction.” State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , ; State v. Omodt, 198 Minn. 165, 170 , ; State v. Traver, 198 Minn. 237 , ; State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573, 575, 576 , , 123 A. L. R. 1015.
State v. Lemke 290 N.W. 307 Minn. 1940
State v. Lemke 290 N.W. 307 Minn. 1940
State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , .
State v. Pehrson 287 N.W. 313 Minn. 1939
State v. Pehrson 287 N.W. 313 Minn. 1939
State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , ; State v. Omodt, 198 Minn. 165 , ; State v. Traver, 198 Minn. 237 , .
State v. Scott 279 N.W. 832 Minn. 1938
State v. Scott 279 N.W. 832 Minn. 1938
State v. Korsch, 168 Minn. 354 , ; State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , ; State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92 , , 14 Ann. Cas.
State v. Tsiolis 277 N.W. 409 Minn. 1938
State v. Tsiolis 277 N.W. 409 Minn. 1938
Furthermore, in a criminal as well as in a civil case, ‘a new trial will not be granted for refusal to dismiss when the state rested, if the evidence as finally in warrants the conviction.’ State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , .” And in State v. Traver, 198 Minn. 237, 238 , , Ave said: “If after denial of his motion to dismiss defendant elects to proceed further and present evidence on the issue or issues and further evidence is received, whether by defendant’s witnesses or by the state, the question o
State v. Traver 269 N.W. 393 Minn. 1936
State v. Traver 269 N.W. 393 Minn. 1936
State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , ; Enterprise Co. v. Pfeifer, 169 Minn. 457 , ; Carr v. W. T. Grant Co. 188 Minn. 216 , .
State v. Omodt 269 N.W. 360 Minn. 1936
State v. Omodt 269 N.W. 360 Minn. 1936
Furthermore, in a criminal as well as in a civil case, “a new trial will not be granted for refusal to dismiss when the state rested, if the evidence as finally in warrants the conviction.” State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , .
Enterprise Co. v. Pfeifer 211 N.W. 673 Minn. 1927
Enterprise Co. v. Pfeifer 211 N.W. 673 Minn. 1927
State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , .
State v. Doty 208 N.W. 760 Minn. 1926
State v. Doty 208 N.W. 760 Minn. 1926
See State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , .